Posted on 12/18/2002 11:00:51 AM PST by zingzang
The Catholic Bishops made two big mistakes in their handling of the sex scandal hitting the church. One, they didnt get rid of priests who sexually abused children. A new policy of no tolerance may fix that. But the other, more basic, problem, is that too many homosexuals became priests in the liberal climate of the 1960s and 70s. The Vatican may fix that problem, and this is what has some in the media worried. On the CBS Evening News, reporter Byron Pitts said, "While the church tries to close the door on one sex scandal, another is brewing. The Vatican is now drafting a document that could ban homosexuals from the priest hood."
Thats another sex scandal? Since the homosexual lifestyle is frowned upon by church teaching, why would that be controversial? Its only controversial if youre a homosexual or if you try to maintain the fiction that there is no link between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children. This is what Byron Pitts tried to say in his one-sided treatment of this very serious matter.
He presented a retired priest and psychotherapist named Richard Sipe, who estimated that 30 percent of Catholic priests are gay. Thats a high number. But Sipe didnt want them kicked out. In fact, he told Pitts that a ban on homosexuals in the priesthood would be "like a gay bar refusing to serve homosexual patrons. It doesnt make any sense." This has got to be one of the strangest analogies ever offered in defense of homosexuals as priests. His rationale is that since gay bars serve gays, the church should keep its homosexual priests. But the church is not supposed to be an arm of the homosexual movement.
Pitts presented the Reverend Jim Morris of a homosexual Catholic group called "Dignity," who assured the audience that homosexual priests are not prone to abuse kids. As Pitts reported, "Homosexuality and pedophilia, he says, are not related." A homosexual activist was supposed to be an objective source of information.
The expert who was missing from the CBS News report was Dr. Timothy Daily of the Family Research Council, who has written about a definite link between homosexuality and child abuse. He says, "Despite efforts by homosexual activists to distance the gay lifestyle from pedophilia, there remains a disturbing connection between the two. This is because, by definition, male homosexuals are sexually attracted to other males. While many homosexuals may not seek young sexual partners, the evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners."
Daily notes that the homosexual movement accepts pedophilia. The North American Man-Boy Love Association, NAMBLA, has been a proud member of the so-called "gay rights" movement, and pedophile themes abound in gay literature. Dailey notes that the late "beat" poet Allen Ginsberg was a pedophile, whose poetry contained explicit references to man-boy sex. Ginsberg was a member of NAMBLA. When Ginsberg died in 1997, journalists praised him as a cultural icon. Some mentioned he was a homosexual, but they concealed his perverted sexual preference for boys.
Reed Irvine can be reached at ri@aim.org
upcoming Gay Freedom Day parade ... March 26, 1992?
Would you be willing to agree that gay activists use Fred Phelps and his merry band of bigots as a red herring, inferring believe in what the Bible plainly states condemning homosexuality leads to intolerance and violence?
Given the comparable rates, how much MORE vulnerable are our sons, than our daughters? I'll bet the number is huge.
Bright boy! Sharp lad! Explain this: How can homosexuals claim that the ancient Greeks accepted homosexuality if there was no word for homosexual? Bright boy! Sharp lad!
Homosexual researchers who find evidence that homosexuality isnt a benign little behavior are now activists? Is science now completely politics?
With a little blather and a gratuitous mention of now dead NAMBLA,
Only with deliberate ignorance of mainstream science and misinterpretation of data can any such alleged link be shown.
First of all, after I stop laughing, there is nothing mainstream about a politically driven agendized organization that totally ignores objective data to save face for their error in removing your pathology from the DSM. Second, Science is not political; therefore NONE of the APAs decision is remotely credible.
NAMBLA, NORTH AMERICAN MAN/BOY LOVE ASSOCIATION, MAN/BOY LOVE, BOYS, BOYS SPEAK OUT ON MAN/BOY LOVE, WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING ABOUT NAMBLA AND MAN/BOY LOVE, POEMS OF LOVE AND LIBERATION, NAMBLA BULLETIN, NAMBLA TOPICS, NAMBLA NEWS, AGEISM, YOUTH, PEDOPHILIA, PEDOPHILE, GAY YOUTH, INTERNATIONAL LESBIAN AND GAY ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL GAY AND LESBIAN YOUTH ORGANIZATION, PRISON, PRISONER, PRISONERS
Now youd think Dr. Groth might try using some cites to back up his OPINION. Its what real researchers do.
Oh, what did you say? Theres not any research that debunks Dr. Daileys study?
Thought so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.