Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott vows to fight, but support slipping: Many on Capitol Hill see Bush push to replace SML
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, December 18, 2002 | By Joseph Farah

Posted on 12/17/2002 11:47:41 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Edited on 12/18/2002 10:27:09 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON – Trent Lott fans were as scarce as hen's teeth in this town yesterday.

============================================================

Apologies, apologies

Hoping to salvage his candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination amid growing controversy, Rev. Jesse Jackson apologized Tuesday night on White Entertainment Television for remarks seen as critical of seven-term Democratic Sen. Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, revered as an icon and elder statesman in his party.

"My comments were hurtful, needlessly opened old wounds and, for this, I sincerely apologize," said Rev. Jackson in the W.E.T. interview, seen as make-or-break for his candidacy.

Jackson's public relations offensive comes as Senate Democrats push to oust incoming GOP Majority Leader Trent Lott over 'racially tinged' remarks at a recent Centennial birthday tribute for retiring GOP Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina. Sen. Lott said fellow Mississippians were proud of casting their vote for Thurmond in 1948 when he ran for president as a Dixiecrat on a segregationist platform, adding that the country, had he won, would be far better off today.

The comments were seized by Democrats to force Lott from the leadership and hopefully from the Senate altogether, making for a 50-50 split and putting Democrats within striking distance of keeping the gavel next month.

Complicating their effort, the Rev. Jackson, in his third run for the nomination, touched off an uproar among party leaders Saturday over comments alluding to Sen. Byrd's past as Grand Kleagle of the Klu Klux Klan, a group with strong roots in the Democratic Party and that Jackson could ill-afford to alienate. Raising the specter of Sen. Byrd could, moreover, open Democrats up to charges of hypocrisy and undermine the drive to topple Sen. Lott, allowing the Senate to fall under GOP control the next session.

"There are things about Sen. Byrd's past I can't say I'm proud of," Rev. Jackson told FOXNEWS Saturday, initially sparking the furor. Pressed if he meant the Senator's past affiliation with the KKK, cautiously Jackson replied: "Well, some might construe it that way, yes -- but that's for others to judge."

Jackson's comments drew sharp rebuke as "insensitive" from the Democratic Congressional White Caucus and the Yellow Dog Democrat Association for the Advancement of White People, influential Byrd bastions both and whose support is crucial to seeking the nomination.

Burris Dunn, president of the National Association of White Colleges and Universities, and a big Byrd supporter, called Jackson's comments "incredibly stupid" and a "mindboggling tactical blunder," handing ammo to Republicans.

"Here we were," he said, "right at the cusp of victory, our party poised to keep the Senate from falling back into Republican hands and along comes that [expletive deleted] Jackson to gum up the works! Unbelievable! The Republican Party, need I remind you, is the party of Lincoln, the moron who freed the slaves, for crying out loud! How disgusting! I mean, think about it: Peter Jennings, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw et al have been very careful, throughout the Lott brouhaha, not to muddy the waters with Sen. Byrd, not even hint on his past dealings, but that idiot [expletive deleted] Jackson has to pop his mouth off!"

Jackson, angering party stalwarts further, refused Saturday to say whether he would seek the endorsement of Sen. Byrd, who was Senate Majority Leader for 12 years. For Democratic presidential hopefuls, receiving the 'Byrd blessing', as party insiders call it, has traditionally been essential to winning the Party's nomination. Eschewing the 'Byrd blessing' would be a controversial break with party tradition and could doom Jackson's chances.

But in his mea-culpa interview last night on W.E.T., Jackson tried to make amends with Sen. Byrd, a former KKK recruiter who once vowed never to serve in an integrated military.

"I want to apologize to Sen. Byrd, whom I've offended," said a humble and contrite Rev. Jackson. "My remarks were totally inappropriate and totally offensive."

Asked if, as an act of contrition, he now plans to seek Byrd's endorsement, Jackson was unequivocal: "Of course I will. Why, I consider it an honor and a privilege just being in the same room with Sen. Byrd, the conscious of the Senate."

The Byrd camp remained unconvinced, however.

"Let me put it to you this way," said a top Byrd staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "If I were Jackson, I sure as heck wouldn't want to be alone in the woods anywhere near Sen. Byrd right now. Not that my boss would ever consider endorsing that [expletive deleted] Jackson, but the total lack of respect he's shown for our party's Grand Kleagle is especially galling."

Aids to Sen. Daschle expressed similar sentiments.

"What the heck is the matter with Jackson, anyway?", one top aid fumed. "Why hand Republicans ammunition like that? What is he, stupid, or what? For weeks, every morning, I pick up the phone and remind Katie Curic and other media mouthpieces of ours not to mention Sen. Byrd, our beloved Grand Kleagle, or risk blowing our phony baloney pro-civil rights cover. Why can't Jackson just keep his piehole shut for once?"

A furious Sen. Ernest Fritz Hollings, Democrat of South Carolina, spoke on the record. "Everybody likes to go to Geneva. A lot of Geneva-ing goin' on out there. I used to do it for the Law of the Seas conferences, and you'd find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they'd just come up and get a good square meal in Geneva."

I reminded him that, not long ago, those very words got him in a heap of trouble with African diplomats. "Oh, C'mon," he shot back. "I was only joking! Right now I'm so hopping mad at that [expletive deleted] Jackson, I could [expletive deleted]. We're so, so close to getting the Senate back! We've got the party of Lincoln, that traitor, scurrying for cover -- on the run like never before! Now that [expletive deleted] Jackson shows up and hands Republicans the loaded gun to kill us!"

I asked Democrat staffers what they thought of the media coverage so far.

"Oh, our people at CNN are doing a wonderful job," one aid said effusively. "At CNN, it's all Lott, all the time. 24/7. They're keeping up the pressure on Republicans. Dittos MSNBC -- all Lott, all the time. Even the Weather Channel is talking about Lott. I heard one forecaster say something like, now for the weather in Mississippi, where that Republican racist hatemonger Lott is from, etc."

And the newspapers?

"In the morning, I pick up the Washington Post, and page one -- all devoted to Lott. Turn to page two, and read more about Lott. Turn to page 3, and read yet more about Lott. Lott this, Lott that, heck, you need to turn all the way to page 15 to see anything about Iraq, Saddam, the War on Terror. hehehe, as a Democrat, it sure feels like hog heaven to me."

Then I broke the bad news to him: The GOP, despite weeks of wall-to-wall negative coverage, hasn't been the least bit tarnished by it. Well over half -- 56% -- view the Republican Party favorably in an ABC News/Washington Post poll just out, while 60% believe the GOP is "committed to equal opportunity for minorities."

But that's not the worse news for Democrats: Even a majority of minorities in the survey -- 52% -- see the Republican Party, despite all the propaganda, as "committed to equal opportunity for minorities."

Ouch! For Dems, that's gotta hurt ;^)

Anyway, that's....

My two cents...
"JohnHuang2"



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 last
To: jwalsh07; rdb3; JohnHuang2; mhking; Common Tator; nopardons; Poohbah; Trueblackman; Jim Robinson; ..
The thing is, Lott didn't have much capital left with the base after all of his screwups:

Impeachment, CWC, power-sharing, not preventing Jeffords from jumping, etc.

Something was going to give, and Lott was probably down to his last chance with the new majority. And, at Strom's birthday party, he blew it - before he even had the chance to cave to Daschle in the 108th Congress - and he blew it by making a comment that Carville was able to twist. He made that comment on national TV (CSPAN), and he should have known that there would have been such a risk. Not only was it something that has unfairly tarred conservatives as racist, but it also put outreach efforts to blacks and Hispanics at risk - outreach efforts promoted by a popular President.

Now, there are several reasons to dump Trent Lott:
1. The abject stupidity of the man to make such a comment on national TV.

2. His pretty poor performance as Majority Leader.

3. The fact that we, as conservatives, tend to hold our side to higher standards of decency and conduct.

4. Since the firestorm started, Lott has moved left on certain issues.

5. The presence of better options as Majority Leader in the Senate (Frist/Santorum/Nickles take your pick).

We would not be in this situation if Trent Lott had not opened his mouth before his brain was engaged. That is where this matter came from, and Trent Lott's the only person who can control what he is saying. And he messed up, big time. I support freedom of speech, but I'm NOT going to support efforts to protect someone from the CONSEQUENCES of exercising freedom of speech. The consequences in this case for Trent Lott will probably involve him losing the position as Majority Leader.

Unfortunately, we've seen some stuff bubble up here. Part of it might be a carryover from other contentious issues. Part of it might be the fact we're all a little touchy and sensititve right now because of the firestorm Lott created with his big mouth.

The fact is, segregation was wrong. It implied that some people did not warrant the same protection as others did because of their race. It harmed blacks by excusing stuff that was inexcusable (like lynching). That was morally wrong, and it was flat-out unconstitutional. And EVERYONE, particularly those targeted by segregation, knew it was an effort to keep a certain group of people down.

The other thing to keep in mind is that the welfare state is also wrong, and it's also nsidious. Because right now, not everyone realizes that it is keeping people down, particularly the group of people it is hurting the most - blacks. Heck, the VICTIMS of the welfare state seem for the most part convinced that it is in their interest to keep supporting the welfare state, and that any effort to reform it is an attempt by racists to screw them over.

If anything, the Left made a BIG miscalculation. They thought we'd all close ranks around Lott and defend him tooth and nail - the way they defended Clinton. They thought they'd have a Senate Majority Leader who would flinch whenever they twitched. Well, they miscalculated, and there is a good chance that Lott's going to have to call a new vote for Majority Leader - one he'll probably lose.

We've got a chance to get the high ground here. And we can work over a few Dems in the process. So let's see if we can't get to work on that front, shall we?

One final note: Free Republic has a preview feature. I suggest we use it so as to make sure we're tyiping what we really mean to say out there. It's rough enough as it is - we don't need misunderstandings to make things worse than they already are.
121 posted on 12/18/2002 7:03:36 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Then I broke the bad news to him: The GOP, despite weeks of wall-to-wall negative coverage, hasn't been the least bit tarnished by it. Well over half -- 56% -- view the Republican favorably in an ABC News/Washington Post poll just out, while 60% believe the GOP is "committed to equal opportunity for minorities." But that's not the worse news for Democrats: Even a majority of minorities in the survey -- 52% -- see the Republican Party, despite all the propaganda, as "committed to equal opportunity for minorities."

LOL, John. Thanks for putting these little tidbits in your wonderful 2 Cents. Funny though: the presstitutes have breathed nary a word about these numbers. Hmmmmm. That's strange. Not.

In any event, in scrolling down this thread, I see that, once again, opinions differ on this Lott thing. From the experienced Common Tator to savvy self studied FR pundits, opinions differ. I am so tired of this Lott thing. So tired. It is piling on by the press and does not seem fair any more. Methinks that the pressholes and Clymers may be overplaying their hand and turning Lott into a victim. I would think many of the sheeple are tired of it too. Oh well, as the beat goes on, I'm moving on....

122 posted on 12/18/2002 7:26:16 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Santorum 'confident' Lott will survive .
123 posted on 12/18/2002 7:26:37 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thanks so much, John!
124 posted on 12/18/2002 9:05:41 AM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
Morning, my friend -- and thanks for the compliment.
125 posted on 12/19/2002 2:20:31 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA
Welcome =^)
126 posted on 12/19/2002 2:20:46 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
hehehe
127 posted on 12/19/2002 2:21:08 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
It's a small club but an exclusive one.

But, lest we run afoul of the New York Times a la Augusta National, we do admit women in our club...hehe

128 posted on 12/19/2002 2:22:46 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
Thanks, friend.
129 posted on 12/19/2002 2:23:20 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson