Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dighton
To put it as charitably as possible, that is stark raving nuts.

Is that your esteemed medical and scientific opinion, or are you just saying that because you don't understand what the evidence demonstrates?

Please post any scientific studies you might know of that prove the smallpox vaccination actually works. You could even post some scientific evidence demonstrating that vaccines are effective if you'd like...

10 posted on 12/22/2002 10:10:51 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: FormerLurker
Seen any smallpox cases lately?

Anyhow, it goes in the same file as "the CIA controls my brainwaves." That is all.

13 posted on 12/22/2002 10:17:30 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FormerLurker; Joe 6-pack; muawiyah; dighton; aculeus; Let's Roll; bonesmccoy; All
Former Lurker, you may choose to forego immunization, but your survival will be dependent on the herd immunity provided by those who exhibit moderate levels of common sense.

In short: you will be a parasite.

That's fine, as far as it goes. Keep in mind, however, that to the degree that folks who are exposed to your swill are persuaded by it, the herd immunity will decrease and your parasitism will be less viable as a survival mechanism.

For the rest, here's a good resource for answers to the anti-vaccine propaganda:


QuackwatchSM
Your Guide to Health Fraud,
Quackery, and Intelligent Decisions

  Operated by
Stephen Barrett, M.D
  If you write, please mention how you found this Web site.

Misconceptions about Immunization

Introduction

Immunizations should be part of routine health care obtained through one's personal physician (or in some instances, through one's local health department). Long-lasting protection is available against measles, mumps, German measles (rubella), poliomyelitis, tetanus (lockjaw), whooping cough (pertussis), diphtheria, chickenpox (varicella), Hemophilus influenzae b (Hib), and hepatitis B. Immunization against all of these is recommended for children by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Practice, and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

All states now require proof of immunization or other evidence of immunity against some of these diseases for admission to school. However, the requirements vary from state to state, and exemptions may be granted for medical, moral, or religious reasons.

Immunization is also important for adults. Those unprotected against any of the above diseases (except whooping cough) should consult their physicians. Tetanus boosters should be administered every ten years. Flu shots (which give only seasonal protection) and immunization against pneumococcal pneumonia are recommended for high-risk patients, elderly individuals, and certain institutional populations.

The success of vaccination programs in the United States and Europe inspired the 20th-century concept of "disease eradication" -- the idea that a selected disease can be eradicated from all human populations through global cooperation. In 1977, after a decade-long campaign involving 33 countries, smallpox was eradicated worldwide. Polio caused by wild virus has been eradicated from the Western Hemisphere; childhood vaccination levels in the United States are at an all-time high; and disease and death from diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, mumps, rubella and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) are at or near record lows. In April 1999, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control issued a fact sheet with some interesting statistics about the impact of vaccination on childhood diseases.

Common Misconceptions

At least ten misconceptions can lead parents to question the wisdom of immunizing their children. If you encounter others you would like Quackwatch to address, please contact us.

Opposition by Chiropractors and Naturopaths

Large percentages of chiropractors and naturopaths advise parents not to immunize their children. These actions are irresponsible and can cause serious harm both to patients and to our society as a whole.

For Additional Information

Quackwatch Home Page

This page was revised on April 20, 2002.



Quackwatch Immunization Thread Here





18 posted on 12/22/2002 10:34:28 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FormerLurker; All
Last week I had a doctor's appt., and I asked my doctor what she thought about the smallpox vaccine and that whole issue. She said what you have been saying. She also does not want one, and hopes that since we are in the middle of nowhere they will not enforce it here. She is a very intelligent woman and the best doctor in this area. Since we are a hub for a huge chunk of the state, we have a rather large hospital and many doctors. She's the best and there are some very good ones here. She knows what she is talking about and so does FormerLurker and other doctors and researchers.

There is so much information out there that I don't know how anyone can deny it, unless they are scared, and denying the danger and becoming angry over it is a coping mechanism.

82 posted on 12/22/2002 6:48:14 PM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FormerLurker; TomB; dighton
Please post any scientific studies you might know of that prove the smallpox vaccination actually works.

Have you ever heard of Edward Jenner? He improved on the primitive form of innoculation called "variolation" which attempted to give a person a mild case of smallpox and, with it, protection against a deadly case. Unfortunately, it wasn't a certain thing that a mild case would obtain from variolation. Jenner saw that people who contracted cowpox did not become infected with smallpox. He innoculated with cowpox and then later with smallpox. The patients did not develop smallpox. As the practice of innoculation became standardized, it was empirically demonstrated to be an effective means of preventing smallpox, though the molecular basis for immunization had still not been discovered.

Of course, folks like krodriguesdc would say that it was a purely poc hoc ergo propter hoc phenomenon: smallpox disappeared due to increase public sanitation--they just happened to be innoculating everywhere that modern sanitation was instituted and mistook the effects of sanitation for effective innoculation. This argument, though, is a case of fetid dingos kidneys since it has been demonstrated since Jenner's day that a. there is indeed a molecular basis for immunity that satisfactorily explains why they found empirically that innoculation worked, and b. members of a clean society with modern plumbing and sewage systems cannot avoid getting a communicable disease that doesn't depend on dirty toilet seats and open sewers to spread.
93 posted on 12/22/2002 7:31:12 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson