Replies

The market would best figure out how to handle the demand from smokers and nonsmokers. However, what do we do with the difference in laws for workers in the restuarant that have to work with the smoke vs those who in other industries don't have to work with smoke ? It seems unjust.

Given that the workplace smoke bans are now universal you still have given no reason for the application to be different for Mary than it is for Martha.

You need to start at square one. Two bars- NO employees-- "How can we liberals extract money?"Well that' so few of the bars so they must be sacraficed. Use employees rights- oh I know let's give them names like Martha and Mary- oh yes let's expand it so it is even more favorable to Rob Reiner and other Socialists. Now let's say Martha is a black lesbian, and Mary is now pregnant by imaculate conception and due around the 25th of this month- the baby's name shall be Jesus. Yes that the ticket.

If or when you have children, maybe they can be used to go to stores to try to purchase cigarettes, so that the stores can pony up even more money for the state. An award shall be due you as a special servant of the government- maybe an arm band you can wear as a Special Servant. The Fatherland appreciates your efforts.

However, what do we do with the difference in laws for workers in the restuarant that have to work with the smoke vs those who in other industries don't have to work with smoke ? It seems unjust.

golder, not every business is universally smoke free. Like I posted, one guy emailed me and he works at an assembly line in IND. The smokers are allowed to smoke right on the line while they work. This is not universal.

There is a plant in MN and the owner said if they pass a smoking ban, he will move his whole plant, lock, stock and barrow. He refuses to impose that on his workers. It's up to the boss.