Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kcvl
I hope all of you who are so outraged by Trent Lott get that perfect person that you want so badly. It's amazing to me that there wasn't one word about him until this. Now he is more evil than Bill Clinton. Enjoy the Minority because that's where it's going to end up and I really don't care any longer.

I'm not looking for friggin perfection. I want someone who is going to stand up for himself and his party when it is attacked. If Lott had been a man on this from the beginning, then we all could have stood with him. But he whined and cried, "Oh I'm so sorry! Please don't hurt me mommy!"

I want someone who is going to stand in front of a camera and say, "Don't you DARE try to paint me as a racist!" But of course, that only works if you aren't a racist and I'm 100% absolutely sure that Trent Lott IS a racist coward. He's too afraid to tell the truth about himself and his beliefs. Does he think black people can't handle it? Too stupid to see truth?

What other explanation is there for his LIES about his voting record? What possible excuse can there be for implying that we are all, every one of us, racists? THAT is why no one came running to his defense. All his friends knew he'd wet himself at the earliest opportunity. Imagine defending Trent Lott! "No way! He's not a racist!" And then Lott himself admits it.

980 posted on 12/17/2002 12:11:08 AM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 979 | View Replies ]


To: Dianna
Agree with your post 980 completely. You hit the nail on the head!
981 posted on 12/17/2002 1:05:03 AM PST by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 980 | View Replies ]

To: Dianna
White House officials say the president's scolding of Mr. Lott was necessary because he had inflamed racial tensions with a remark that his critics — first among them the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton — interpreted as an endorsement of segregation. Democrats and newspaper and television reporters asked him to repudiate Mr. Lott's remarks.

Several Republican senators who had publicly excused Mr. Lott's remark at Mr. Thurmond's 100th birthday party say they feel "blindsided" now by the president's belated and blunt attack on Mr. Lott.

One Republican aide on Capitol Hill said Mr. Bush "cut the feet out from under" these senators by remaining silent for a full week after Mr. Lott's comments, and then to go on the attack.

The White House at first discounted the significance of the remark.

Four days later, the White House gave Mr. Lott a strong endorsement as point man for the president's agenda in the Senate. "The president has confidence in him as Republican leader, unquestionably," Mr. Fleischer said.

But 24 hours later, after both the New York Times and The Washington Post urged that Republicans replace Mr. Lott as their leader, the administration's position changed dramatically.

More here...

982 posted on 12/17/2002 1:14:09 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 980 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson