Replies

Laws such as affirmative action, etc. etc. are a way of changing the environment in which certain groups thrive. One could look at the fact of someone being admitted to a prestegious school based on ethnicity as a way of "thriving."

Same goes with employment.

No, I didn't mean that. Post#85 was a correction and it probably wasn't enough either.

All this depends on future demographic trends - and assumes huge population growth is possible. It may not be. We may run out of available water, or energy, or some other necessary resource. What then?

Laws such as affirmative action, etc. etc. are a way of changing the environment in which certain groups thrive. One could look at the fact of someone being admitted to a prestegious school based on ethnicity as a way of "thriving."

So are the welfare programs. Can you imagine a girl of the "welfare class" contimplating getting pregnant, if she would have to support herself and the baby, by her own earnings at McDonalds/whatever? End all the various welfare programs, and the birth rate among the underclass would plummet.

Birth rates go down as societal wealth goes up. More precisely, in a society where a couple HAS TO have lots of kids in order to ensure that there will be somebody to look after them in their old age, they will have lots of kids. Where a couple can count on Social Security and investments in their old age, kids are an economic liability.

To understand why a society is going in a particular direction, you need to discover and understand the underlying incentive system