Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod
No, I didn't mean that. Post#85 was a correction and it probably wasn't enough either.

All this depends on future demographic trends - and assumes huge population growth is possible. It may not be. We may run out of available water, or energy, or some other necessary resource. What then?

96 posted on 12/16/2002 10:56:11 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: liberallarry
Re; post #96. An environment will only support so much life, then infant mortality goes up, life expectancy goes down. Then it's survival of the fittest. Are you fit?
101 posted on 12/16/2002 11:15:36 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: liberallarry
I was merely using the words "environmental limit" in a new way (as might an evolutionist when talking about species thriving).
107 posted on 12/16/2002 11:33:56 AM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson