Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben Stein Askes: "What would it take?"
Forbes Magazine ^ | Dec. 23, 2002 issue | Ben Stein

Posted on 12/14/2002 7:13:19 AM PST by yankeedame

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: txflake
.333 isn't half bad. I usually get at least 50% on Jeopardy, but with Stein it's really hit or miss...
41 posted on 12/14/2002 11:24:31 AM PST by Lizard_King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Lizard_King
[snip]"who were raised without a heavily constrained definition of their gender role"

There have always been single parents or missing parents.  I lived in a neighborhood 45 years ago where most of the men were merchant marines and whole generations were raised without men in the home but the kids well. (Other examples are military families and over the road truckers.)

I've found through life that girls need a strong willed male as teenagers and do better but the male could be a relative.  Most teenager girls I've seen get really testy between 16-18 and trash their mothers constantly.   I have seen lots of problems when moms try to disipline 6' teenage boys too.

"not liberal bs "friend" parenting"

 This I see as the greatest challenge to our country as I've hinted in the post above.

42 posted on 12/14/2002 11:27:05 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lizard_King
"-----word-nerd-alert


I assume you mean gutter humor...I couldn't resist..."

HA HA dude, I mean d-u-d-e whoa! The Microsoft Word Dictionary Rules dude!

You just used the Word dictionary I'm not impressed. You might look at the Websters that says; 2nd definition - an utterance that is strange, unplesant or disagreeable.

I'll get to your post latter I couldn't resist dude, ya know man, cool.
43 posted on 12/14/2002 11:38:12 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lizard_King
 

[snip]"in a heirarchical role, rather than being all buddy-buddy with the daughter-in-law (perfectly understandable, of course)."

There are friends and then there are relatives and the liberals want to blurr the difference.  You cannot tear down a society when the roles are intact.  So my daughter-in-law wants to be close to her new family but reserves the right to trash us because we're old fashioned and not listen our advice because we're not her cool "Friends". (She doesn/t have to take our advice just listen.)

These are the relationships she has learned at home from parents but it is reinforced each time she watches TV and I guess the Ben Stein Show is just like the rest of TV programs in that respect that there is very little respect.
 
 

44 posted on 12/14/2002 11:49:10 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Are we there yet?
45 posted on 12/14/2002 11:53:26 AM PST by Ukiapah Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Sort of smacks of the Goals of the Communist Agenda outlined in "The Naked Communist".
46 posted on 12/14/2002 11:55:23 AM PST by GOP_Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Banger
I'd be glad if I never heard another chord of James Taylor, or any of the other folkie-liberal-peacenik drivel in my life.
47 posted on 12/14/2002 11:57:57 AM PST by Ukiapah Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0
"I don't think old Ben Stein gets it."

If anyone in this country gets it, it is Ben. He is not just another empty headed actor. Long before he was an actor, he was a presidential speech writer, member of the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, author of several books, lawyer, college professor, and not least, son of Herb Stein, former chairman of the presidents (Nixon) council of Economic Advisors.
48 posted on 12/14/2002 12:28:11 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Banger
"BTW, I do not wish to leave my homeland, and I can say that with certainty, because I have so much to achieve still."

Ok, sorry for my improper word usage. Are you waiting for your instructions from Ossama or Saddam to achieve your goals? ;^)


49 posted on 12/14/2002 1:12:03 PM PST by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
Sorry, I forgot to add the "sarcasm off" tag. I really like Ben Stein. I wish more Front Line Conservatives had his balls.
50 posted on 12/14/2002 1:15:45 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Ben tells it like it is. He's a human being - a mensch.
51 posted on 12/14/2002 1:22:45 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: Valin
--Diversity is a FACT!! Not a value.--

Its also a fact that if everyone tries their hardest diversity will take care of itself.

And whatever diversity used to mean the libs have redefined it as group based marxism, which in their "minds" trumps merit.

55 posted on 12/14/2002 2:10:38 PM PST by republicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
"If anyone in this country gets it, it is Ben."

As Mom would say, "Why don't you parctice what you preach?"

Is Hollywood so shallow that even an outted conservative like Ben has to play like a liberal dope on TV. So if his credentials are so great why can't he act with dignity and I say again be funny.

Are liberals using him to make fun of conservatives -- so he is really being played for a fool?

In 25 years we've gone form the GE College Bowl to "The Man Show".
56 posted on 12/14/2002 2:12:53 PM PST by BeAllYouCanBe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: BeAllYouCanBe
It is clear to me that you do not know Ben Stein. He has been my friend for thirty years, and I do know him. Please argue with people your own size.
58 posted on 12/14/2002 2:18:58 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: sinclair
If women in power here in the free world bothers you, you could immigrate to one
of those Muslim countries. Problem solved for you.


I suspect the "rest of story" is not a problem with women "in power".
The fuller situation is that there are problem when any group is TOTALLY "in control".

Goes along with the truism of "power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely".

As a non-Catholic, I'm of a mixed mind over what has caused the mess in the RCC.
Was it a historical human-in-the-institution problem for centuries; i.e., some very
small percentage of priests were always corrupted?
And then the problem intensified with the onset of the "The Sixties"?
And/or did liberalization (including more power in the hands of non-clerics) contribute?

I have no answer to these questions...
It will be interesting to "stay tuned" to see if somebody (or group) ever
really dissects the situation and find out WHY this mess has happened.
(Beyond the underlying cause of human sin...)
59 posted on 12/14/2002 2:24:57 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Banger
I was attempting to be humorous in my reply. Sorry you don't possess that attribute. Maybe your God will see fit to add it to your personality wherever it is you might end up.


60 posted on 12/14/2002 2:33:23 PM PST by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson