Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GWfan
You don't have to look for hidden meanings. All you have to do is compare what he said to the Dixiecrat platform. This is almost as bad as Clinton's 'is is' comments.
81 posted on 12/13/2002 7:34:54 PM PST by Karsus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Karsus
Wrong. Trent Lott was 6 or 7 years old in 1948. He was trying to make an old man happy on his 100th birthday. I doubt the dixiecrats even crossed his mind while he was paying homage to Strom. Nice try at demonizing, but I don't buy it.
82 posted on 12/13/2002 7:44:28 PM PST by GWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: Karsus
I checked out the Dixiecrat platform. Section 3 seems to be a rejection of Truman's demand that "subversives" in the Army be identified and put on a "list".

He issued that order in 1947.

In retrospect over 54 years it makes the Dixiecrats look like they were in league with the Commies, doesn't it?

At the same time, when comparing those party platforms, we should never forget that the Democrats ended up nominating an active, practicing racist who had actually taken actions that resulted in the deaths of millions of people who were of a race he simply didn't approve of.

So, whose hands are clean in this?

83 posted on 12/13/2002 7:48:47 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson