To: Alberta's Child
There are two more reasons why Lott has to go: He is (1) inept and (2) a coward.
The way he's handled this situation shows why he was never fit than to be Bob Dole's, and later Tom Daschle's coffee-and-doughnut boy.
However, at this stage of this neo-con and Drudge-induced crisis it all boils down to one slogan: "Thurmond never lynched anyone, but Robert Byrd belonged to an organization that did."
That'll take care of the messy edges of this scandal forthwith.
14 posted on
12/13/2002 10:48:17 AM PST by
lavrenti
To: lavrenti
However, at this stage of this neo-con and Drudge-induced crisis it all boils down to one slogan: "Thurmond never lynched anyone, but Robert Byrd belonged to an organization that did." That'll take care of the messy edges of this scandal forthwith.
And that's why Lott can easily stay on as a senator, just not as leader. If Democrats, smelling blood in the water, try to further censure or oust Lott from the Senate, we can call for the heads of Byrd and Hollings.
18 posted on
12/13/2002 10:52:15 AM PST by
inkling
To: lavrenti
However, at this stage of this neo-con and Drudge-induced crisis... What?! Drudge caused this? Are you an idiot, or just imitating Lett?
Either Senator Lett is an idiot, or he's a segregationist. Which is it? Either way, he should step down.
Now, we know, however if there is a Republican counterpart to Clinton apologists, you are one.
61 posted on
12/13/2002 2:20:03 PM PST by
Nephi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson