The GOP vigorously attacked the New Deal throughout the 1930s and got no where. Democrats used to refer to Republicans as the "party of the rich" back then too, because anyone who wasn't on welfare or the government payroll used to hiss and boo FDR and call his bureaucracy as "alphabet soup". Wendell Wilkie, an Democrat-turned-Republican from Indiana (hardly the land of New England RINOs) vigorously bashed FDR over his anti-buisness policy (Wilkie owned an electric company) and pledged to privatize many New Deal programs, especially the Tennessee Valley Authority. He got no where among the supposed "states rights" south. The voted in lockstep for FDR and his big federal government. Dixiecrat Governors and their constituents were more than happy to support Franklin's reelection (as long as he continued to endorse segregation) Check out the 1940 election results in the deep south:
Georgia.....Roosevelt/Wallace (D) 265,194 84.81% votes
Alabama.....Roosevelt/Wallace (D) 250,726 85.22% votes
Mississippi......Roosevelt/Wallace (D) 95.70% votes
South Carolina....Roosevelt/Wallace (D) 95,470 95.63% votes
By the time of Dewey, the GOP got tired of losing year after year and yes, I suppose Dewey tried to act more complacent to attach swing voters. He continued to go after the New Deal, but obviously not in a manner "acceptable" to you. The party as a whole controlled congress in '48, and their record speaks for itself (they WOULDN'T pass Truman's big government agenda, hence he went after them as the "do nothing" 80th Congress. In fact, most the Midwestern Republicans in congress were to the right of the already conservative party platform)
I am well aware of party history, my family was conservative, and quite frankly, never supported FDR or any of his agenda (more than I can say for the Dixiecrats). It is you who is ignorant. GraniteStateConservative posted the Dixiecrat platform in it's entirety
You knock Dewey for not attacking the New Deal in the "right way", yet the supposed "conservative" Dixiecrats didn't offer ANY critism of the New Deal in their platform. As he noted, it "had NOTHING to do with lowering taxes or reducing government spending." (Most of the south was heavily blue-collar at that time and supported the idea of labor union goons and "taxing the rich", not to mention giveaway programs for the working poor) Half the platform is spent praising the virtues of segregation and lynching.
Conservative Republicans like Coolidge used to easily win the black vote. Then racists like you decided to rewrite history and promote garbage like that. The Strom Thurmond of 1948 was far more quasi-libertarian than any kind of traditional "conservative", and your screen name (Ann Rayd was a pro-abortion athetist) most likely attests to that.
Isn't it interesting that now, simply refusing to make racial issues your top priority is "racist"?