So you ARE suggesting “that one violation of the Constitution somehow justifies another.” How nice. I had expected better of you – God only knows why...
;>)
Whenever someone has the temerity to criticize Saint Jefferson of Davis you southron types always trot out Clinton. And other than the fact that both were hack southern politicians I don't get the connection.
"Southron types?" I'm from Minnesota - and (unlike most of the 'union-at-any-cost-types' here ;>) I've actually read the Constitution. As for your comments, you are entirely mistaken: “whenever someone has the temerity to” suggest that rule by the President’s ‘sense of morality’ somehow ‘trumps’ the rule of law, I “trot out Clinton” – and Mr. Lincoln. Funny how you ‘morality-is-more-important-than-law’ types always attempt to change the subject...
;>)
And you seem to be saying that constitutional violations by Jefferson Davis were permissible. I had expected no less from you.