And you seem to be saying that constitutional violations by Jefferson Davis were permissible. I had expected no less from you.
LOL! By all means, please explain why you believe I "seem to be saying that constitutional violations" of any sort by government officials are "permissible." Please be specific. You appear to have confused me with your entertaining friend Walt!
Or perhaps you are simply engaging in that notorious liberal passtime - accusing your opponent of what you yourself have done. When caught in the act, those same liberals often revert to the 'two-wrongs-make-a-right-argument.' Tell us: will you now insist that the federal government could ignore the Constitution that created it, simply because the president of the Confederate States presumably violated that country's Constitution? Most of us (I'm not sure about #3Fan and some of your other compatriots ;>) are well aware that Mr. Davis' 'questionable' actions as President of the Confederacy occurred after the secession of the Southern States. But feel free to 'prove' secession unconstitutional on the basis of Jefferson Davis' acts as president, if that's the best you can do...
;>)
I had expected no less from you.
And if you continue to 'develop' your communications skills, you will soon be giving Walt a run for his money. Bravo!
;>)