Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xlib
Good post.

Lott has to know what the Dixiecrat Party was all about. Suppose the words "just slipped out." I am still at a loss to account for the frame of mind that would just randomly pick the 1948 presidential run out of the air when casting about for something nice to say about Strom. Even to recall Strom peeing out the door of the Senate Chamber into a bucket in the cloakroom during his big filibuster would have been better.

Then his apology makes it worse by referring to segregation as "the discarded policies of the past" rather than forthrightly saying that segregation was wrong. What he said could mean no more than "It would have been nice to be able to keep Jim Crow, but I know we can't go back now." Besides which he apologizes in weaselly modern fashion for "offending" people, not for saying something that was objectively wrong to say.

Lott is an adult, of sorts, and he said what he said. I am not much interested in what he meant. I am a little tired of people in our society saying stupid, harmful things and then bleating defensively about what they "really meant." The words he spoke have a meaning, and it is a reprehensible meaning. Lott said them, and then he shilly-shallied around for days, and finally he issued an ambiguous non-apology.

Furthermore, this is not the first time the d**n fool has said stuff like this. At this point, I don't care whether he has a secret nostalgia for Jim Crow that he can't keep to himself, or whether he is just completely irresponsible in his use of language. A man who can't control his tongue has no more business in a position of political responsibility than a man who can't control himself in any other way.

Dump him.

77 posted on 12/10/2002 7:12:34 PM PST by Southern Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Southern Federalist
Stop this stupidity! What the Dixiecrats were about was State's Rights and conservative government. Their platform has been twisted into the single "They were for segregation" little sound-byte that has been spewing forth incessently. What is being attempted on Lott has succeeded on the Dixiecrats.

Narrowing the focus of what they stood for to one controversial specific of their platform, spun by those that hated them, is the same idiocy that is screaming "Racist" at Trent Lott now!

You all are acting like Demoweenie media types!
82 posted on 12/10/2002 7:21:19 PM PST by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson