Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Lott should resign as majority leader (vanity)
12/10/02 | me

Posted on 12/10/2002 5:35:47 PM PST by xlib

Today on Rush a black air traffic controller was expressing his outrage over Trent Lott’s comments at the birthday party. Rush made several comments, including the point that while racism surely persists, it’s much less common than it once was, that everybody has obstacles, some hurdles are greater than others etc. The caller was surprised to discover that RUSH LIMBAUGH IS NOT A RACIST!

This is the dilemma conservatives face: although many, if not most, conservative policy ideas would benefit the poor and minorities if implemented, conservatives are widely assumed to be indifferent or hostile to the poor and minorities.

There are some parallels between our dilemma and that of African Americans. During segregation, the trailblazers were exceptional people; Jackie Robinson was one of the best ever to play the game, the first black students at the University of Alabama were all honor students. But millions of ignorant rednecks just saw “dumb, uppity niggers.” These folks endured the abuse, and persevered, because they were conscious of something larger than themselves that they represented.

We too are subject to the false assumptions of ignorant people; these assumptions are often amplified in popular culture and the media, and it limits what we can accomplish. We have two choices: we can whine about liberal media bias, the double standard for liberals and conservatives caught in ethical lapses, etc etc, or we can heed the advice given to Condi Rice by her parents: you’re going to have to work twice as hard, and hold yourself to a higher standard, than those who oppose you.

I was never prouder to be a republican during the impeachment than when Bob Livingston announced his resignation on the house floor. He had the guts to choose a higher standard, and the grace to accept his fate for falling short of it. The fact that Bill Clinton can debase the oval office and then try to portray a 21-year-old intern as a stalker, or that Jesse Jackson can yap about “Hymietown,” or that Robert Byrd can ramble on about “white niggers,” and survive politically, doesn’t surprise me. They are democrats, and the ethical bar is set low. But republicans must choose a higher standard, and Trent Lott’s comments make him unsuitable for the job he seeks to reclaim.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: lott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2002 5:35:47 PM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xlib
Black Americans will change when they become individuals instead of a group.

The GOP is truly color-blind, they will see that some day, when they mature as a people. Time will heal.
2 posted on 12/10/2002 5:39:27 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xlib
But Trent Lott didn't make a racist statement. He simply said that the SC Senator would have made a good president. People are inferring racism into his comment. They can do the same with anyone, forcing them out of office.
3 posted on 12/10/2002 5:39:46 PM PST by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xlib
From a propaganda standpoint, Lott's remarks are a major setback IF HE REMAINS MAJORITY LEADER. But if the Republicans CAN him--and do it FAST--the whole thing will blow up in the Democrats' faces.

The Republicans could turn an apparent loss into a net gain.

4 posted on 12/10/2002 5:45:38 PM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
But Trent Lott didn't make a racist statement. He simply said that the SC Senator would have made a good president.

Well Senator Lott should clarify what "problems" would have been avoided if everyone had voted like Missippi in 1948

5 posted on 12/10/2002 5:48:45 PM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
He simply said that the SC Senator would have made a good president.

Thurmond split off from the democrats that year to run as a "dixiecrat", on an explicitly segregationist platform. To suggest that such a man, running that kind of campaign, would have made a good president, is at best unbelievably stupid, at worst racist. For the man seeking what is arguably the second most important republican office in the country, it is unforgivable.

6 posted on 12/10/2002 5:49:58 PM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xlib
Lott was unsuitable long before his moronic remarks.

He should have been removed from the Majority/Minority post long before now. He's a mush with a footbal helmet doo!

If this keeps him from becomming the new Majority leader, so be it.
7 posted on 12/10/2002 5:53:14 PM PST by TD911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xlib


8 posted on 12/10/2002 5:54:16 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
This is a gift -- an opportunity to get rid of a useless leader and put in someone who will fight for conservative legislation instead of playing Let's Make a Deal.
9 posted on 12/10/2002 5:54:18 PM PST by Inkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

TONIGHT! 6pm PDT/9pm EDT Unspun With AnnaZ and Mercuria
An interview with MICHELE MALKIN!

Click HERE to listen LIVE!

Call in! 1-868-RadioFR!

Click HERE for RadioFR Archives!

Click HERE for the RadioFR Chat Room!


10 posted on 12/10/2002 5:54:34 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
Agree wholeheartedly. But it has to be fast.
11 posted on 12/10/2002 6:00:30 PM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
The GOP is truly color-blind, they will see that some day

Some already do; I'd like to see more, sooner rather than later. Lott atop the senate will delay that day; Lott chastened and replaced will hasten it.

12 posted on 12/10/2002 6:01:38 PM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
I agree wholeheartedly except I think you mis-characterize the event of losing Lott as Majority Leader. Getting rid of the eunuch Lott would be a win in its own right. To the extent it improved the image of Republicans by even a few members of a bloc vote for the Dems, then that would be just another benefit. The main benefit would be to use this silliness to get rid of a total a$$hole who should never have been leader of the Republican minority much less majority.
13 posted on 12/10/2002 6:01:53 PM PST by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: smevin
I agree with you, Lott has zero leadership, let's hope they wait for this to blow over (a couple of months) and then kick his tail out of that Majority position!
15 posted on 12/10/2002 6:05:21 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Inkie
BTTT, Inkie.

I like your positive ("gift") outlook.

BTW, Laura Ingraham pointed out tonight that Tom Daschle was pretty soft on Trent, and she attributed this to the fact that Trent and Tom are known to be pretty good friends. (Yuk.)

But I think Tom has an ulterior political motive. I think he would like to see his friend Trent stay as majority leader because of the harm which it will do to the Republicans.

(Tom may not even be taking this position in a conscious way. He has political instincts involving ill will for the Republican party, including his "friends.")

In short, Trent needs to resign as Majority Leader. It's a WONDERFUL opportunity for us conservatives.

16 posted on 12/10/2002 6:07:53 PM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smevin
To call a light-hearted comment made at a birthday party unforgivable is going overboard.

If you or I said it, it's forgivable. If Trent Lott, private citizen, said it, it's forgivable. For the holder of one of the highest profile positions in the GOP, it's not.

17 posted on 12/10/2002 6:08:06 PM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Registered

Senator Lott Dod

18 posted on 12/10/2002 6:09:59 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xlib
So far, Pat Buchanan has been the only one I've seen, who has expressed disgust over the way Republicans are groveling over this.
19 posted on 12/10/2002 6:10:49 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
They should can him anyway. We don't need a Senate leader that resembles a used car salesman. If he is not smart enough to do a decent job of defending his statement then he needs to go.
20 posted on 12/10/2002 6:11:52 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson