Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

>Black Lawmakers Say Lott Apology Not Enough; NAACP Calls for Resignation
AP Breaking | 12-10-02 | Jim Abrams

Posted on 12/10/2002 1:42:40 PM PST by Lance Romance

Black Lawmakers Say Lott Apology Not Enough; NAACP Calls for Resignation

Published: Dec 10, 2002

advertisement

WASHINGTON (AP) - Black lawmakers said Tuesday that Senate Republican leader Trent Lott did not go far enough in apologizing for remarks he made praising the 1948 presidential run of then-segregationist Strom Thurmond.

Democrats should not be too quick to drop the matter either, one black House Democrat said.

Separately, the NAACP said Lott, who will be Senate majority leader in the next Congress, should resign from his leadership position. "Hateful bigotry" has no place in Congress, the organization's president said.

"It sends a chilling message to all people," said Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., of the remarks Lott made last week at a birthday party for 100-year-old Thurmond, R-S.C., who is retiring after 48 years in the Senate.

"These are the kinds of words that tear this nation apart," said Cummings, who on Tuesday was elected chairman of the 39-member Congressional Black Caucus. "We are going to do something about it."

Lott said at the party that his state of Mississippi was proud to have voted for Thurmond in 1948, when Thurmond headed the states rights, anti-integration Dixiecrat ticket that captured 39 Southern electoral votes. "And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either," Lott said.

He apologized late Monday, saying, "A poor choice of words conveyed to some the impression that I embraced the discarded policies of the past. Nothing could be further from the truth, and I apologize to anyone who was offended by my statement."

Asked about the situation on Tuesday, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said of Lott, "He has apologized for his statement and the president understands that that is the final word from Senator Lott."

Fleischer said President Bush thinks Americans should take pride in the "tremendous strides and changes and improvements" that have been made in race relations since 1948. "We were a nation that needed to change," the spokesman said.

Lott was also sharply criticized Tuesday by Ken Connor, president of the conservative Family Research Council. "Senator Lott's ill-considered remarks will serve only to reinforce the false stereotype that white conservatives are racists at heart," he said. "Republicans ought to ask themselves if they really want their party to continue to be represented by Trent Lott."

Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, the outgoing head of the Black Caucus, said she called Lott Monday and he apologized to her, saying he was caught up in the moment and did not realize his remarks would be interpreted as they were. Asked if that was sufficient, Johnson said, "We're not finished in this caucus."

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., also said that Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle spoke too quickly on Monday when he said he accepted Lott's explanation that he hadn't meant his words to be so interpreted.

"This is a Democratic Party issue," Waters said. "It is not enough to simply defend or to explain these kinds of statements and then at election time talk about why black Americans should turn out in large numbers."

Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, who will take over as House Democratic leader next month, said of Lott, "He can apologize all he wants. It doesn't remove the sentiment that escaped his mouth that day."

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, in a statement from its president Kweisi Mfume, said Lott should resign from his leadership post "to make way for another member of the Republican Party whose moral compass is pointed toward improving race relations and not dredging up this nation's poor, polarizing performance of the past."

Lott's comments, Mfume said, "are dangerously divisive and certainly unbefitting a man who is to hold such a highly esteemed leadership role."

Civil rights leader Jesse Jackson last weekend also called for Lott's resignation as majority leader.

Lott's spokesman Ron Bonjean, asked about the latest criticisms, said Lott "made a sincere apology and it speaks for itself."

Cummings, a four-term congressman from Baltimore, defeated Rep. Bobby Rush of Illinois, founder of the Illinois Black Panthers in 1968 and a member of Congress for 10 years, in the vote to head the all-Democratic black caucus. Other caucus officers for the next session of Congress are Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas, Corrine Brown of Florida, Danny Davis of Illinois and Barbara Lee of California.

---


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: naacp; racebaiting; racialdivision
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-180 next last
To: sauropod
REad David Schippers book for what really happened.

David Schippers is a conspiracy theorist whose statements about 9/11 disqualify him as a serious human being.

I wouldn't know whether to believe what he wrote or not.

81 posted on 12/10/2002 3:51:55 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
It doesn't take much to get some people fired up. He never mentioned race or segregation.

Actually, as I mentioned in another Trent ThurmondGate thread. On the way out this morning I did hear a reporter say, Trent Lott mentioned segregation.

Now I know Lott didn't say it and you know he didn't BUT thats whats being reported. Also, I'm sure black media is reporting it that way as well.

82 posted on 12/10/2002 3:54:27 PM PST by Aaron0617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ArcLight
Agreed. Lott's a lousy salesman for our side. He phrases things the wrong way and puts us on the defensive rather than the offense. It is a lot easier to score points on offense than defense.

Lott's incompetence as a salesman is not limited to the "race" issue. Listen to him on tax cuts, or energy, or campaign finance reform, or any issue. He concedes the wind, possession of the ball and enthusiasm of the crowd to the other team. He fumbles the ball, throws interceptions, and virtually gives the ball to the other side.

83 posted on 12/10/2002 3:56:26 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If you want to win the black vote on the issues, then win on the issues.

How can we over this din? Everytime I open my mouth about race relations, my opponents will bring up Lott to end the debate.

I hate to say this, but sometimes we just have to play the d*mn game if we want to get anything done.

84 posted on 12/10/2002 3:59:01 PM PST by Hobsonphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
After further reflection, and given Lott's tepid apology, non apology, I have decided that I think Lott should step down as majority leader. Why? No, it is not pressure from the usual suspects, or because Lott is not a red meat conservative bit pull that didn't sink his teeth into the impeachment situation and not let go. Rather it is because I think his off theh cuff comments (which may not in fact have been all that off the cuff), do indeed represent his views (based on the tepid apology and further reading about Lott's resume), and I don't want someone with those views representing my party in a leadership position. It is a matter of principle with me. In addition, I think the GOP will get points if his colleagues depose him for that very reason (that he simple doesn't reflect their views), and explain that that is their reason.

Sometimes simply doing the right thing is also the best politics.

85 posted on 12/10/2002 3:59:24 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Are you willing to lose the majority in the Senate now (because that is what you call for may well mean)?
86 posted on 12/10/2002 4:01:39 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I think some at least of the people calling on this board for Lott to step down really want the DemocRATs to maintain control of the Senate.

Democrats always have an alterior motive. If they say they're offended, what they really want is to DESTROY Lott and replace him with a RAT.

87 posted on 12/10/2002 4:03:18 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Hobsonphile

You can't beat them at this game.

It's like trying to beat them at social programs, or them trying to beat us on support for the Second Amendment. It can't be done.

And allot of what you are seeing on TV is completely disconnected from reality, those people are so isolated in their ivory tower, beltway existence that they honestly believe this is a big issue with mainstream America and that no one would simply accept it as a mistake, shrug and forget it.

And if we continue to treat it like the goof up that it honestly was, that's exactly what people will do.

88 posted on 12/10/2002 4:04:46 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Aside from whatever mileage they wring from this little flap, it looks like they are just screwed.

This "issue" has already peaked. Now that we have North Korea and a US reminder of intent to use nukes to respond to a WMD attack, the Lott story's going to fall off the rader by tomorrow afternoon at the latest.

89 posted on 12/10/2002 4:05:39 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I hope so..

Only been a day and it's already high time.

90 posted on 12/10/2002 4:06:41 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
>>
He's right, just like Jesse's "Hymietown", or Byrd's "White Nigger" comments.>>

Like it or not, Trent Lott's big fat mouth is what brought all this on, and we can't afford to play the "Hey, you guys have racists, we want one too" game.

Lott must go.
91 posted on 12/10/2002 4:07:02 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
>> Lott's rather silly statement is being twisted to have a "hidden" racist meaning<<

Pardon me for raining on the parade, but doesn't Lott at least owe SOME explanation for what his words meant?

They DID sorta sound racist, and I for one am curious.

Anyway, Lott has no one to blame but his own stupid self.
92 posted on 12/10/2002 4:10:27 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hobsonphile
Everytime I open my mouth about race relations, my opponents will bring up Lott to end the debate.

If that ends the debate, then you're arguing with very dumb people. Why are you grovelling to people who've got Louie Farrakhan and Jesse Jackson on their side?

I hate to say this, but sometimes we just have to play the d*mn game if we want to get anything done.

That's not "playing the game." It's throwing in the towel.

Blacks are NOT GOING TO VOTE FOR REPUBLICANS! They're too shackled to that Democrat plantation.

We'd be better off focusing on the Hispanics, whose values are much closer to those of the GOP anyway.

93 posted on 12/10/2002 4:11:51 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
Yeah, it did sound bad. He apologized for it.
94 posted on 12/10/2002 4:13:35 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I told you all that this would happen. The only way to fight against PC fascism is to stand up to it. Apologizing for an innocent remark that liberals "interpreted" to be offensive never works. They just up the ante and demand more.

The left smells blood, and they smell it because a lot of conservatives have jumped on their PC bandwagon. They got their apology, now they want another Senate seat by running Lott out of office so the Mississippi governor, a Democrat, can appoint his replacement.

Lott shouldn't have apologized. Now we'll never hear the end of it.
95 posted on 12/10/2002 4:13:38 PM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
>>I think some at least of the people calling on this board for Lott to step down really want the DemocRATs to maintain control of the Senate.<<

Not me. I hate what Trent Lott is doing and has done to our party.
96 posted on 12/10/2002 4:15:56 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Of course Lott's apology is not and never will be enough for those who choose to stay offended by his remarks at a birthday party for Strom Thurmond. If any black leaders and their democrat enablers really believe that racism is wrong, let them clean their own houses.For starters investigate Jesse Jackson and his shakedown of white businesses. Tell us why black and other minority groups are allowed to make racist remarks about white people without it being made into a federal case. This whole situation has been opportunisticly exploited to benefit advocates of political correctness, Lott haters, and the democrat party. Cannabalistic Republicans are no smarter than Lott. They eat their own instead of handling differences in private. They would be happier becoming a minority party again so they could join the victim classes. It is much easier to complain, moan and groan, than to actually have the responsibility of leadership. If the senate chooses to let Lott become an ex-leader they can certainly make it happen. Maybe Lott has been their public face because he is covering their behinds. There are not enough mea culpas in this universe to satisfy those who want Lott done in for whatever reason. Just let us all remember this episode when the next turn of the rack comes up with another Republican on it. Cave in to the PC crowd and see how quickly it will be touted as a sign of weakness to be exploited even more agressively.
97 posted on 12/10/2002 4:18:17 PM PST by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
>>Yeah, it did sound bad. He apologized for it.<<

A mealy-mouthed apology for "those who were offended" that was as meaningful as a fart in a hurricane.

He never explained what he meant, and to this good day, i'll be damned if i know. I only know it could legitimately be construed as sounding racist. The only one who can clear up what he really meant to say is Lott.

He has failed to do so. This isn't going away on its own, and the dumbass better figure that out.
98 posted on 12/10/2002 4:18:31 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
I dont think it matters what the Liberals say, this is a wonderful opportunity for the Republicans to get rid of Trent Lott...

I agree. This is the perfect opportunity for us to get Lott out and get a more effective Majority Leader in.

And we can use the hyper-sensitive, cry-baby hypocrites on the left to help accomplish that goal.

Besides, it was an incredibly dumb thing to say.

99 posted on 12/10/2002 4:19:17 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
And we can use the hyper-sensitive, cry-baby hypocrites on the left to help accomplish that goal.

I would have said that it's the left that's using you folks. Let's wait and see who ends up in control of the Senate after this all shakes out.

100 posted on 12/10/2002 4:22:14 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson