Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave S
You are apparently too stupid to get it. Even if you UNINTENTIONALLY violate a local law, and in this case his biggest crime was not having enough money to bribe the local police, your rights can be stripped. Are you so callous to simply say "F#%& you" to EVERYONE who has accidentially run afoul of the law? Do YOU know EVERY law in EVERY country in the world?

BTW, felons have the RIGHT to carry arms for protection and common defense. They had them before the unconstitutional 1968 GCA (translated directly from a Nazi gun control law, introduced and passed by a DemocRat Congress and signed by a DemocRat president), and they have them now.
135 posted on 12/11/2002 6:07:46 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants
BTW, felons have the RIGHT to carry arms for protection and common defense. They had them before the unconstitutional 1968 GCA

If the 68 law is so obviously unconstitutional, why is it that no one has challenged the constitutionality of it nor has the court granted cert. When federal courts are deciding that American citizens like Padilla dont have the right to an attorney, I think its a real stretch to claim that the 68 law is unconstitutional. The country has the right to defend itself. The constitution is not a suicide pact.

136 posted on 12/11/2002 6:34:29 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson