[No dems 2002]

This law is obviously popular in Texas. John Cornyn is on record as supporting it during his campaign against Ron Kirk (who dodged the issue). President Bush supported the law as Governor, and the highest courts of Texas have refused to overturn it (not to mention the state's legislature).

I have no problem with the government outlawing sexual perversion between homosexuals. These "freedoms" have no place in our society. We all know our founding fathers never dreamed of this.

The late US Supreme Court Justice Byron White said that for homosexuals to think that such conduct should be legal was "at best facetious." Well said. Homosexuals have no rights in the eyes of God to engage in deviant behaviour and they shouldn't in the eyes of man either. I feel the same way about bestiality and child abuse.

[smith288]

Homosexuals have no rights in the eyes of God to engage in deviant behaviour and they shouldn't in the eyes of man either.

We also are told not to be judge of fellow man.

"Let any amongst you who are without sin cast the first stone."

[Lev]

Homosexuals have no rights in the eyes of God to engage in deviant behaviour and they shouldn't in the eyes of man either.

Well, your opinion is a very good reason for separation of church and state. Regards.

[Kevin Curry]

I have no problem with the government outlawing sexual perversion between homosexuals. These "freedoms" have no place in our society. We all know our founding fathers never dreamed of this.

If the good citizens of Texas are, on the whole, wise and moral enough to outlaw sodomy, more power to them. If the citizens of the People's Republic of California believe that the purest form of sexual expression is between a man and his goat, and they wish to pass laws enshrining bestiality as the official state sexual preference, they should be allowed to do so. I will move to Texas and watch from a distance as Californa suffocates from aspirating the vomit of its deviance.