Posted on 12/10/2002 7:38:59 AM PST by rightwing2
Who Lost Latin America?
CNSI Position Paper
Today, President Bush will meet with the newly-elected Communist-backed President-Elect of Brazil, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (Lula), at the White House. Both sides say they want close cooperation. Among the issues to be discussed are US efforts to increase international foreign aid to Brazil’s ailing economy to the tune of over ten billion dollars in order to stave off the temptation of Lula to default on Brazil’s $260 billion debt, something he hinted he might do earlier in his presidential campaign. Another topic which will likely be discussed is Mr. Bush’s proposal for a hemispheric trade pact, the Free Trade of the Americas for which Lula is considered the main obstacle having denounced the initiative as nothing but a “USA annexation project.”
Lula, a longtime Marxist firebrand, has only recently begun billing himself as a newly-minted moderate reformer. Based upon the statements that we are hearing in the international media and which we see coming out of Washington, DC both from government officials and scholars, it appears that his charm offensive has been successful. However, for longtime observers of Brazilian political affairs, there is little reason to believe that Lula will abandon his anti-American foreign policy positions anytime soon. It is much more likely the case that Lula is portraying himself as a moderate in a bid to disarm his would-be opponents at home and in the West prior to his consolidation of power in Brasilia after which his true colors will likely become more evident. This would follow a pattern established by Lula’s good friend, Communist Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez who was also democratically elected some four years ago.
Back in August, CNSI President David Pyne warned of an impending event, which would represent the greatest defeat for the cause of freedom since Mao and his Red Army proclaimed the People’s Republic of China over half a century ago. As it turned out, the warnings of those who urged the Administration to take action to avert the election of a Communist-in-all-but-name to the Presidency of Brazil notably including several members of Congress went unheeded and on October 27th, Lula was elected as Brazil’s next President with over 61 percent of the vote.
Over two months ago, the Center warned that a Marxist takeover of Latin America’s largest and most populous country would likely result in several other Latin American states falling like a series of dominoes to well-supported Marxist politicos and revolutionaries. This trend has now begun to manifest itself with the election of a Marxist former coup leader and admirer of Communist Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez supporter, Lucio Gutierrez, to lead Ecuador late last month only a few weeks after Lula was elected President in Brazil.
Beginning on New Years’ Day, 225 million people in Latin America will find themselves ruled by Marxist leaders in Brazil, Ecuador, Cuba and Venezuela. Together these four nations will represent the single most dominant power bloc in all of Latin America. Argentina, which holds its presidential election in March and where two leftist presidential candidates are leading in the polls, may be the next domino to fall. Bolivia narrowly averted a similar fate when during their presidential elections, Marxist presidential candidate Evo Morales campaigned in the summer on a fiercely anti-US platform losing the election by a mere 1.5 percentage points. As one noted Latin American analyst, Constantine Menges, stated the question that now presents itself is, “Who lost Latin America”?
A few months ago, Mr. Pyne predicted that, if elected President, Brazil would join the Sino-Russian Alliance to oppose the United States. This prediction is corroborated by the fact that in June 2002, Aloizo Merchant, a leading member of the Workers’ Party who may be tapped to serve as Brazil’s new foreign minister under Lula stated that “alliances with China, Russia…are important to give force to a possible anti-American coalition.” Brazil already has a thriving trade and strong relations with Communist China. Of even greater concern are Lula’s statements on September 13th to a group of Brazilian military officers that Brazil should restart its nuclear weapons program, which had succeeded in building but not testing two atomic bombs before it was halted in 1994. It is possible that China might assist Brazil in its quest for nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missiles to deliver them in an effort to counter US dominance of the Western Hemisphere just as it covertly did to help Pakistan to counter Indian dominance of south Asia.
While he meets with President-Elect Lula Da Silva today, President Bush should consider implementing a more realistic policy vis a vis Brazil which is geared less toward accommodation and more toward organizing the forces of freedom in Brazil against the incoming Marxist Lula regime. The future of freedom in the Western Hemisphere depends on the United States taking immediate action to stem the growing Red tide whose dangerous ramifications may soon impact against our shores. No more dominoes must be allowed to fall to Marxist domination and control to join the newly established anti-American Brazil-Cuba-Venezuela-Ecuador axis of nations.
I didn't realize it was missing ...
Come on, you guys ... 'fess up! Who lost Latin America? Did it fall out of your pockets or did you just set it down and forget where you put it?!
Spain.
Next question please.
Nooooo ... reeeaalllyyy? (sarcasm/off)
China's missing too?
It was an accident! I swiped the locks off the Panama Canal, and Latin America just . . . . drifted.
As with most every other foreign and domestic policy disasters of the 90s, it was the sinkmeister. He's a pinko himself, and his wife even more so, therefore why should we be surprised that the Reds have mad inroads in our backyard after 8 years of his TLC of America's and freedom's enemies.
I knew I should have changed the locks when I left. Geez, ya can't trust nobody anymore.
Most of the articles are writte as this one: have you noticed that not only it fails to answer the question posed in the title but never even addressed it. That too is the style of Buchanan's writing and a weakness.
Few arguments, mostly a restatement of certain fact presented in a biased, anti-Bush manner.
Nothing much to be learned from this source.
I just looked, and Latin America wasn't there. OTOH, it wasn't in the usual spot - under the couch cushions - for lost things around here either, so I'm stumped. I'm going to put up some flyers later this afternoon, and if I get any tips, I'll post them here...
"Damned if you do, damned if you don't". Do we bump off a few dictators and suffer international condemnation, or wait until all Latin America is Communized and hostile against us?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.