Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Meri Anne Stowe, chairwoman of the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, said she can sympathize with men in such situations, but is more concerned about the children involved.

what b.s. Why not assign fathers at random out of the phone book? Seeing as truth and paternity have nothing to do with it?

4 posted on 12/09/2002 9:14:24 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black
Why not assign fathers at random out of the phone book?

Who is to say that they wont in time?

The courts are saying that men should pay for children who are not theirs, so why not? This is the direction we are headed in.

This nonsense has to stop.

9 posted on 12/09/2002 9:23:31 AM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
You might be onto something here. The Federales could simply load all of the males into a database and likewise all of the 'needy' children in the country. A random selection program could be implemented and notices would go out to those selected to start mailing so much in the form of child support. What could be more democratic?
10 posted on 12/09/2002 9:23:55 AM PST by x1stcav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson