Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Here's someone who had a relationship with the child, established some responsibility for the child ... yet now he doesn't want to be responsible any more but wants parenting time?" she asked. "How does that benefit the child

I think these men should not be held accountable by LAW for child support and that the mothers should be fined (but not jailed). On the other hand these men are the little one's "dads". Even though the men have been hurt ,it wasn't done by the children who loved and trusted them. Morally they should remain a part of the childs life, maybe even sueing for visitation or custody and child support from the biological fathers. JMO CD

15 posted on 12/09/2002 9:44:27 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: CindyDawg
...maybe even sueing for visitation or custody and child support from the biological fathers

But it was not the biological fathers who committed the fraud. It was the MOTHER who chose to commit fraud. It was the mother who chose to lie to her child, and to the man. It was the MOTHER who AT A MINIMUM slept with 2 men without using contraception. One man was for fun, the other was for profit.

20 posted on 12/09/2002 9:50:28 AM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg
I prefer an all-or-nothing approach. If the man does not want to undertake any financial responsibility for the child, then he should not have any paternal rights.
22 posted on 12/09/2002 9:51:18 AM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson