[Smogger]

This is one serious hangup you've got here. Two new threads on this subject in one day.

Due to the rise in the numbers of illegitimate children and the proliferation of DNA testing, and with several states considering new laws to address this issue, it is certainly current issue.

Question: Why the ad hominem attack on Budda? Who cares if he wants to post two or thee threads a day on the subject as long as they are not duplicates?

[BuddhaBoy]

Why the ad hominem attack on Budda?

My (current) girlfriend suggests that the woman is "intrigued". Heh, heh.

[Mamzelle]

What ad hominem? Check back through the thread for names hurled at me, to which I am sanguine (except for that Lott shot). The internet can be a boisterous place. To wit, I am a liar, on the side of perfidous women, a victim of various female frustrations. On and on. But except for that dreadful Trent Lott insult, I am only amused.

BB has posted more than these two on this subject, and other interesting threads with the theme of Those D@mned Women. Have I challenged his right to post, or rather expressed curiosity about the obvious attachment to the issue? Now, I shouldn't be intrigued? What are the threads offered for, if not intrigue.