Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Demonstrator gets jail time
©Finger Lakes Times 2002 ^ | December 08, 2002 | By: MATT REYNOLDS, Times Staff Writer

Posted on 12/08/2002 5:49:57 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

SYRACUSE NY- While many local residents were making shopping lists, a Lyons man spent the first week of the holiday season in jail.

Last month, John Murtari, of Franklin Street, was sentenced to 10 days imprisonment by a federal judge for refusing to leave the Hanley Federal building in downtown Syracuse. He paces corridors there outside the offices of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton hoping to win her support for family law reform.

On Nov. 22, Murtari was taken to Oneida County Jail, where he served his sentence because the Onondaga County jail was full.

"The first thing they do is take your belongings and give you prison clothes: an orange jumpsuit, orange sweatshirt and pants, and a few changes of underwear," Murtari said Friday. "They give you sheets, a blanket and toothpaste, and a toothbrush obviously made by the lowest bidder. Mine was from China. The bristles fell apart by the end of the week.

"Then they take you to your cell - an 8-by-15 (foot) room behind a Plexiglas window with a bed, toilet, sink and table. For the first 24 hours you can't leave the cell. I read a mystery novel the last guy had left there, meditated and did calisthenics.

"After the first day, you spend most of the time with the rest of the prisoners in a common area."

Since 1998, Murtari, has been arrested 27 times for pacing the corridors, picture of him and his 9-year-old son, Dominick, in hand, in Family Courts, sheriff's stations and the federal building. Until last month, he'd never been convicted on any of the charges.

A Catholic, Murtari compared life in jail to spiritual retreats he's attended.

"It's very quiet," he said. "I spent most of the day playing chess or cards. Sometimes I watched TV.

"It's a lot safer than people think. As a typical white-collar citizen, I thought the prisoners would be dirt bags. Most of them are normal people (who are) addicted to drugs or alcohol."

In November, Murtari asked the judge to spare him the 30-day maximum because he plans to fly to Colorado Dec. 18 to pick Dominick up for the holidays.

Murtari founded the Web site Akidsright.org, and started his civil disobedience after his ex-wife won custody of Dominick in the mid-1990s.

For years, the trespassing and loitering charges against Murtari were always dropped.

"It became absurd," Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Southwick. "What he's doing is demonstrating, and for that he needs a permit."

Southwick has asked a federal judge for a restraining order barring Murtari from entering the Hanley Building. Murtari could be sentenced to six months in jail if he violated such an order.

Murtari is appealing last month's conviction, and said he will return Dec. 30 to the Hanley Building.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 666; fathersrights; hildebeast; thehildebeast
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
btt
61 posted on 12/09/2002 10:32:57 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSN558
Both of the Toon's are Clear and Present Dangers.

Mustang sends.
62 posted on 12/09/2002 11:46:33 AM PST by Mustang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I did glean this much from the fatherland, oops, excuse me, the homeland security bill: I posted this earlier in the week:


Are you aware that part of the law has wording in it that restricts information on "critical infrastructure" issues?
The icing on the cake is that there is SEVERE punishment for federal employees who reveal secret information even if the public is at risk? Do you know what that means? If a federal employee knows of embarassing or even potential lethal information, they are prohibited from warning the public. Facilities subject to attack that could trigger a toxic release endangering nearby communitees have a green light to police their own security. If a community is affected by such toxic release(s), they can be kept completely in the dark under the "critical infrastructure" wording in the act. These communities might not know what is being mixed in the plant that could affect the water and air, thus, they won't have the opportunity to prepare for such an occurrence. I haven't received a complete copy of the entire act, but, this is what I've gleaned from it so far.

Thanks for the info re: Thomas.

FReegards

63 posted on 12/09/2002 7:09:29 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: poet
Are you aware that part of the law has wording in it that restricts information on "critical infrastructure" issues? The icing on the cake is that there is SEVERE punishment for federal employees who reveal secret information even if the public is at risk? Do you know what that means? If a federal employee knows of embarassing or even potential lethal information, they are prohibited from warning the public.

Can you provide a section number for this?

64 posted on 12/10/2002 6:17:23 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: Jesus. Enough said.
I think you misunderstand me. People who are on drugs are not normal in any sense of the word. I am talking about people who are normal people, who become addicted to drugs. They aren't normal while on drugs, but when they aren't on drugs and before they tried drugs, they were as normal as anyone else.
66 posted on 12/10/2002 8:41:26 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
It's on pages 312-313 which I got from http://hsc.gov/legislation/hr5710.pdf

A lawyer friend gave me the interpretation.

FReegards
67 posted on 12/10/2002 9:58:08 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson