Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Eyes Clarance Thomas for Supreme Court Chief Justice [Giving Liberals Nightmares Alert!]
Washington Whispers-U.S. News and World Report | Monday December 16, 2002 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 12/07/2002 12:00:17 PM PST by ewing

White House aides are floating two names to replace aging Chief Justice William Rehnquist: Associate Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia.

Top Bushies say the conservative Scalia has the edge but not to count Thomas out-even though Dems still try and tag him as Anita Hill's sexual harasser.

Bush, however, has been told that Justice Thomas isn't keen on going through the meat grinder again.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: chiefjusticethomas; dubya; liberals; scaila
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 next last
To: FoxPro
I enjoyed reading that - thanks.
101 posted on 12/07/2002 3:30:53 PM PST by ThePythonicCow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Is Stevens a RAT appointee?

Stevens is a Ford appointee.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

102 posted on 12/07/2002 3:37:12 PM PST by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: don-o
>>>This and the Al Gore self immolation is just a good news day.<<<


What did Sore I mean Gore do? Please, do tell... Is there a thread? He had a book-signing in the D.C. area today.


103 posted on 12/07/2002 3:45:36 PM PST by End The Hypocrisy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: End The Hypocrisy
What did Sore I mean Gore do? There are a couple of threads running on Albert's wounded psyche.

Click on "Latest Posts"

104 posted on 12/07/2002 3:49:27 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Procyon
"no requirement to be a lawyer"

Interesting! However, how many people who have been appointed to the SC have NOT been lawyers, let alone judges from a lessor court?

I'd be curious to know the answer to that!
105 posted on 12/07/2002 3:51:39 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ewing
they are probably rioting at DU already

If not they're certainly revolting. :)

106 posted on 12/07/2002 3:54:38 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ewing; mhking
Clarence Thomas for Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court!

He is perfect for the job. And appointing him would right a terrible wrong done him by the liberals.

107 posted on 12/07/2002 3:57:36 PM PST by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
According to White House aides O'Connor, Rehnquist, and Stevens are leaving.

I thought Ruth Ginsberg wants out - I read she has cancer and wants peace and quiet at home. O'Connor simply wants to retire and Rehnquist, a widower, wants to spend time with his grand kids. I hadn't read about Stevens.

108 posted on 12/07/2002 3:58:23 PM PST by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
"Sec-Gen of the UN perhaps"

This gets my vote. And ... I said so after Hillary chose NY to run for senator. When x42 also chose NY, and formally opened an office there, I was even more convinced the UN was his ultimate goal. What better place for him (and HER to try to dismantle U.S. soverignty??
109 posted on 12/07/2002 4:00:30 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; ewing; afraidfortherepublic; cloud8
Clinton was never disbarred from the Supreme Court. After his law license was suspended in Arkansas (for 5 years), the Supreme Court suspended him and gave him 40 days to show why he should not be disbarred. He chose to resign from the Supreme Court bar instead, and they accepted his resignation.

In theory at least, if he regains his law license in some state, he could reapply to the Supreme Court.

110 posted on 12/07/2002 4:08:29 PM PST by Nonfaction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I don't know how they could put Thomas through the meat grinder again. I mean, Bill Clinton has admitted to doing worse than Thomas has been accused of.

Oh, wait a minute. I'm talking about democrats. Never mind.

111 posted on 12/07/2002 4:10:16 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FoxPro
Wonderful story. Thanks for sharing. I have such respect for Justice Thomas.
112 posted on 12/07/2002 4:25:10 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Nonfaction
Thanks for the good info!!
113 posted on 12/07/2002 4:38:26 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ewing
I don't see how Thomas could be Chief Justice, when the guy never says anything during oral arguments. Scalia has been on the bench since '85. He and he alone has the intellectual firepower and experience to be the Chief Justice.
114 posted on 12/07/2002 4:57:21 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Souter was a baby-killer before he got to the Supreme Court, and he has been a baby-killer ever since

If you have evidence Souter personally killed a baby let's have it. Otherwise STFU. Although I'm against abortion, I deplore smear tactics based on limited facts.

115 posted on 12/07/2002 5:02:52 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
You gotta love the Idea of either, but the First Black Chief Justice, that would be huge.
116 posted on 12/07/2002 6:17:02 PM PST by agincourt1415
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
FEDEX (Supremes Nominee) his 8 x 10 Glossy to the White House LOL.
117 posted on 12/07/2002 6:20:35 PM PST by agincourt1415
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Antonin Scalia would make a great Chief Justice and so would Clarence Thomas. Both men would be a fine choice. PresBush couldn't go wrong.

If the GOP controls the Senate, there's absolutely no way, Slick could ever make it onto the USSC. NEVER!

118 posted on 12/07/2002 6:54:25 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonfaction
He chose to resign from the Supreme Court bar instead, and they accepted his resignation.
In theory at least, if he regains his law license in some state, he could reapply to the Supreme Court.

Well, he could I suppose. A previous post pointed out "The Judges...shall hold their Offices during good Behavior." (U.S. Const. Art. III, Section 1) I think that means "good behavior while in elective office or on the bench," and that such good (or not good) behavior carries with one for life. After 8 years of clinton's lying, his impeachment, and the last minute pardons, there's no way the Senate or the People could be fooled by his "definition of what is is" kind of defense that walked the fine line of legal technico-babble. clinton, that perversion and disgrace to our country, will always puke out his opinions legal, political and otherwise, but he will never practise law again, and indeed from now on if ever he should appear in court, it will be not as the judge but as the defendant.

119 posted on 12/07/2002 7:05:10 PM PST by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
[Sec-Gen of the UN] gets my vote. And ... I said so after Hillary chose NY to run for senator. When x42 also chose NY, and formally opened an office there, I was even more convinced the UN was his ultimate goal. What better place for him (and HER to try to dismantle U.S. soverignty??

Yeah, and I left out the Nobel Prize. But you're right, of course...one world government was always the clintons' ultimate goal. He sold us out to the red Chinese and the Moslems. And even though the Eurotrash thought he was a diplomatic imbicile during his misadministration, now he goes over there and they treat him like a god--did you see that fawning display in Germany a month ago?

I wonder...what chain of circumstances could lead to his installation as Secretary General of the U. N.? It would need Hilary and a whole lot more to pull it off, but as time goes on and President Bush continues a successuful presidency, clinton is becoming too irrelevant to stage a comeback. Like who does he think he is...Nixon?

120 posted on 12/07/2002 7:50:24 PM PST by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson