Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sparta; rintense
I will admit that I have some philosophical diffrences with the more fanatical objectivst. I don't see "unbridled" selfishness as a good thing we all need help at one time or another and I believe there is such a thing as rational religion( ie the universe existing in time must have a cause existing outside of time or your left with the absurd solution that the timeline itself has no point of origin). I believe that rational individuals seeking their enlightened self interest is a good thing but saying all altruism is evil( ie never ever do a favor for strangers) is bad.
17 posted on 12/06/2002 5:39:48 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: *libertarians
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
18 posted on 12/06/2002 5:40:57 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: weikel
I believe that rational individuals seeking their enlightened self interest is a good thing . . .

Few people are solely or even consistently rational. A great many people are emotional, intuitive, and mystical much of the time. And what does "enlightened" mean? It means something entirely different to a religious person than it means to a Randian atheist.

Even the people--perhaps especially the people--who are convinced they are rational and enlightened are generally emotional, pigheaded, and dangerously ignorant in their biases much of the time.

A wise person is a humble person and would never be so smug or proud as to insist he consistently sees and thinks rationally or even that rational thought always yields the best answer. A wise conservative understands that some human institutions that proud "rational" free-thinkers disdain as irrational and unprogressive are actually of fundamental importance to the stability and health of any society. Chief among these are religion and the traditional family. These institutions are not "reasoned" into existence. They grow organically over decades, centuries, and even millennia in response to felt human need. They prove their worth by their staying power.

The worst times in the lives of any people are when these institutions are attacked by intellectual do-gooders (perhaps we should call them "can do it betters") bent on creating a more rational society by excising the "bad" elements of tradition and so-called superstition.

Ayn Rand and her objectivist acolytes are "can do it better" intellectuals. They are far from humble. They are Jocobin-style ideologues who would cheer the elimination of every tradition and institution of time-tested value (e.g., religion, the nuclear mom and pop family, etc) that they adjudge irrational, superstitious, and unenlightened just as quickly as Marx sought to destroy these same institutions in the name of "progressivism."

Wise, careful conservatives honor the balance and the tension between the rational and the intuitive, and always keep a sharp eye on ideologues who are overbalanced to one tendency or the other. In paraphrase of Reagan's oft-repeated dictum I might say the most frightening phrase in the English language is, "I'm a rational and enlightened person and I'm here to help you overhaul your society."

65 posted on 12/06/2002 6:52:08 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson