[ImphClinton]

Yea and these diviants say gays do not do more child abuse.

I do not see how you can live a diviant lifestyle and not do diviant behaviour. I see little difference between gay behaviour and child abuse. Neither is natural. Neither has any purpose other than sexual satification.

[Lucas1]

I guess really what this forum needs is for people to start posting all of the news stories about sexual abuse from the straight community. Gosh the board would just about be shut down with the number of posts. Funny how certain people just post all of the gay abuse stories. No wonder people think gays abuse more kids than straight people.

[ArGee]

Neither has any purpose other than sexual satification.

We need to work a little harder to change the language. Sex is for reproduction and, hence, a natural part of every sexual creature. When "sexual" activity is performed for purposes other than reproduction it should be called "erotic" activity. As such, homosexual activity is an oxymoron. Only homoerotic activity is possible. And while sex involves mutual commitment to each other and to the possible family that will result, erotic activity is primarily self-focused. This distinction can be made clear if we quit calling it sex when it is clearly erotic.

homoerotic people
erotic movies
premarital erotic behavior
etc.

Shalom.