Bill O'Reilly & Homosexuality - Tonight on The Factor (O'Reilly, a homodupe, spins out)

Stephen Bennett Ministries ^ | 12/4/2002 | Steve Bennett Ministries

[unspun]

From: Stephen Bennett Ministries Subject: Bill O'Reilly & Homosexuality - Tonight on The Factor

*** MEDIA ALERT ***
Stephen Bennett Ministries Visit www.SBMinistries.org Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2002

Bill O'Reilly Confronts the 'Gay' Issue Again Tonight on The O'Reilly Factor - Fox News Channel Wednesday, Dec. 4th - 8pm & 11pm EST
Special Guest - Dr. Joseph Nicolosi of NARTH
------------------------------------------------------------
You may remember Stephen Bennett's appearance on The O'Reilly Factor on Sept. 3rd of this year. O'Reilly blasted Bennett, a 39 year old national Christian recording artist and former homosexual, as being a 'religious fanatic' and 'idiot.'

Stephen shared with millions his story of deliverance from homosexuality over 10 years ago and salvation in Jesus Christ. Bennett is now married to his wife Irene over 9 years. They are the parents of two little children.

Regarding his faith, new life in Jesus Christ and biblical beliefs that homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of God, O'Reilly verbally slammed Bennett and compared him to the 'hate-filled, Islamic terrorists of 9-11.'

Bill O'Reilly came out in full support of 'gay' special rights in the nation's largest homosexual magazine 'The Advocate' on Sept. 3rd. He gave his endorsement for homosexual adoptions and when pressed, even homosexual marriage.

Tonight, Dr. Joseph Nicolosi of NARTH (National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) is scheduled to appear on The O'Reilly Factor, discussing his new book 'Preventing Homosexuality' and debating a 'gay' activist. Though NARTH is a 'non-religious' organization, Dr. Nicolosi is his highly respected for his research and contributions in the area of helping men and women overcome their unwanted same-sex attractions.

Please tune in tonight and keep Dr. Nicolosi in your prayers, that he will make a great impact to potentially reach millions, as well as our friend Bill O'Reilly, with three simple truths:

(1) NO ONE is born homosexual;
(2) In most cases has everything to do with childhood; and
(3) Complete change IS completely possible.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Did anyone see how angry the professional Homo-activist got? He doesn’t want the cat let out of the bag. That there is no science or proof that homosexuality isn’t a disorder. Only opinion! The Hooker study is bunk and it was the pivotal study used for removing it from the DSM.

[JoJo Gunn]

If you don't understand the Orwellian nonsense the Leftists have already put on us, then I can't explain it any further.

As far as our resident Enabler, what to do? How about keeping it behind closed doors, and out of the schools and the workplace? But any thinking person knows your kind can't keep to themselves. They have no self respect, and no self control, and care not a whit for society as a whole, hence their craving for the approval of children who haven't even reached puberty. The last thing you people want is to be "left alone", and our ancestors knew it.

By the way, did you see your Komrade on O'Reilly, the Nazi who wants censorship for Psychology Today? Did you notice how hysterical he was, how rapid he talked, how he used the term "snake oil" over and over? He didn't help your cause much. And I couldn't help but notice he was pushing Thought Control, by his web site named hatecrime dot org.

[First Amendment]

Great reply - Scott Lively in "The Pink Swastika" calls homo-pushers (whether acting homos or not) "homosexualists". Anyone interested in the deep connection between Nazism and faggotry should read that book. I read it several yrs ago, now there is a new edition with added info. It can be ordered at www.abidingtruth.com.
Another interesting fact - according to Traditional Chinese Medicine, homosexual acts cause mental disturbances, up to and including psychosis, and promote violence and aggression.

[LO_IQ]

If it is a hate crime to speak against homosexuality and false religion, then a priest will charged when preaching against false religion.

The fact that no priest has ever been charged under these hate crime laws indicate that the Chicken Little argument you presented is faulty.

The way to attack our enemies is with truth, not made-up arguments.

Otherwise you lose your credibility.

When Miami-Dade passed the anti-discrimination ordinance protecting gays, I went to the public meetings.

Among other things, I remember Christians zealots claiming that homosexuals will be using the Ladies' Bathrooms if this ordinance was passed.

The ordinance was passed. Gays became a protected class, and guess what?

Ladies' Bathrooms are still off limit for gay men.

Recently, when the Christian Coalition put the question on the ballot for a referendum, the Christian Coalition lost the repeal effort.

The Miami-Dade Christian Coalition lost its credibility, especially with Christians like me.

[Jael]

bump

[First Amendment]

C.C. - would you be interested in reading non-homo agenda books and then thinking about the topic? Homosexualists (pushers of homo-agenda philosphy) lie continually. Remember the "one in ten" crap? That was the reason they had to get in schools, to "protect" the supposed "one in ten" that was "gay". Then a few years ago there were TWO big studies (one by Guttmacher Institute, connected with Planned Parenthood so you know they were not anti-homo) and the results were that roughly 1.5 to at most 2% of Americans are homosexuals. Turns out the homo activists KNEW they were lying (I've read quotes where they admitted lying) but pushed those figures anyway.
Debates that do not debate facts are useless. There are so many facts that totally defeat the homo agenda that the media never never mention.

[CapedCrusader]

It's more than two. What, do I have to point them all out to you? Obviously, you're content in your bubble. So be it.

[CapedCrusader]

Actually, I've seen more lies from the anti-gay crowd. Fact remains: there is nothing "to do" about the gay "problem." Homosexual people ain't going away and at the risk of sounding warm and fuzzy, "We're all going to need to learn to live together." And that's the truth, Ruth.

[First Amendment]

C.C. - Are you purposely remaining uninformed? Remember the big flap a few months ago about a book written by some woman and published, I believe, by a university in Minnesota or one of them cold states? I think the title was something like "In Harm's Way" and her case was that having sex with children wasn't necessarily harmful and could be good for them.
Allan Ginsberg was a member of NAMBLA and all the liberal elites loved him. Harry Hays, who died (yay!!!) recently and was the so-called "father" of the American pro-homo movement (started the Mattachine Society in the 50's or 60's) ALSO started NAMBLA and none of the slavering obituaries in the media mentioned that.
Ten or more years ago I lived near SF and there was a creep teaching required classes at a University there who advocated sex with children and published articles in some Dutch pro-pedophile meagazine. I wrote letters to the local newspapers about it but of course they weren't printed. The academic elite IS heavily pushing sex with childen.
My question again - are you purposely remaining ignorant?

[subterfuge]

"If there's any "distinctly protected [sexual] class of person, to be specially nurtured by society," it's, guess what....heterosexuals. "

That is a moronic statement. Society doesn't specially nuture anything. You a soccer mom?

[Always Right]

It's more than two. What, do I have to point them all out to you?

Why not? Certainly there are stats available on these types of murders. I am certain there are only a handful of cases, so perhaps maybe you are the one in the bubble. These types of cases attract a lot of publicity. I bet more people die from sticking their tongue in a light socket...

[CapedCrusader]

Society doesn't specially nurture anything.

Oh, ok. Society is an amorphous nihilistic chaos, with no norms or mores, promoting nothing in particular. My mistake.

[CapedCrusader]

It's more than handful. But whatever. And I'll take your bet.

[breakem]

I hate to bring a little stink bomb to your party, but liberals support government programs in almost every area of social behavior. Libertarians support liberty and personal responsibility. They are almost polar opposites. You however believe in government controls in people's private lives for the "good of society." Intelligent people would say you are closer to being a liberal. But you know this don't you. You're not as cute as you think you are.

[bvw]

Homosexual people ain't going away and at the risk of sounding warm and fuzzy, "We're all going to need to learn to live together." And that's the truth, Ruth.

Add to the utterly inane mock "wisdom" file, Giles.

Substitute "embezzler", "burglar", "rapist", "serial killer" for "homosexual people" -- they ain't going away either, and understand well what "learning to live with them" means!

[Frapster]

most conservatives don’t have the debating skills the left does, i.e. being able to talk over someone and respond to points at the same time

You're not describing a debate - you're describing a verbal mugging. When I see people do this they never respond to the issue - they just chant their mantra over and over again even if it's wrong.

[subterfuge]

Saying that society specially nurtures heterosexuals is like saying that it specially nurtures people who have all their limbs.
Society doesn't go out of its way, so to speak, to give groups an advantage. Individuals may, and certain groups might, but not "society" as we normally define it, imho.

[CapedCrusader]

I am well informed. And?

What were we arguing about? I've totally lost track, it's been such a dogpile. I'm guessing you want me to say: "Homosexuals are sick and unnatural and are after the children, etc. and we've got to do something about them."

Blech.

[CapedCrusader]

Yeah, all those people you substituted involve crime, violence and murder. If you can honestly and sincerely equate homosexuals with them, your worldview is more warped and distorted than I could ever hope to change.