Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sexual perversion pervades America: Dr. Laura Schlessinger warns parents
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, December 3, 2002 | Dr. Laura Schlessinger

Posted on 12/02/2002 10:45:47 PM PST by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: ventana
I want it

Do you choose this? Or is your "want" a given to you that you have no choice over?
41 posted on 12/03/2002 9:38:58 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
It's not about extending courtesy to homosexuals to have sex with whomever - but rather refraining from acting out on that perversion. Most humans have at one time or another perverted thoughts. The idea is to refrain from acting out on them and praying for strength to do it. That's what it means to be fully human, no?

The homosexual lobby isn't merely interested in that prerogative for themselves but for a loosening or rather a elimination of any boundaries concering sexuality for anyone at any age, and in any fashion.

42 posted on 12/03/2002 9:44:14 AM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Most humans have at one time or another perverted thoughts.

Oh? Like what?
43 posted on 12/03/2002 9:49:19 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This woman never ceases to amaze me at how far she will go to appear more of a jackass than any other moral commentator.

Amidst all the doom and gloom about the economy these days, comes a ray of sunshine! The New York Times on Nov. 19 carried this headline: "Sex Museum Reports Profitability." The story begins, "In its first six weeks the Museum of Sex at 233 Fifth Avenue has drawn more than 15,000 visitors, well over the projections of the number needed to make a profit, reports Daniel Gluck, the founder and executive director."

So what? There's a museum. It has exhibits that draw enough people to make a profit. Move on, folks, there's nothing to see here.

Doesn't that just warm your heart? It sure does mine. The story goes on to tell us that the big draw for these thousands of people is the opening exhibit entitled "NYC Sex: How New York City Transformed Sex in America" and, further, that the catalogue of this first show is "boldly illustrated." I'll bet!

So what? Is that somehow an illegitimate topic for a museum centered around sex? Did she think they'd somehow entertain a display detailing the history of cubism?

New Yorkers complain that their city gets a bad rap as the Sodom and Gomorrah of the USA – yet, here they are trumpeting Gotham as catalyst for "transforming sex in America." As proof, the exhibit features pornographic videos of the fetishist trades, displays of 19th-century gay resorts in the Bowery, and a celebration of "the public and orgiastic sex that turned into a health disaster" known as AIDS. Hard to imagine why any city would want to take credit for that!

Sounds to me like it's a lot more historical than titillating. And to use the term 'celebrating' seems flagrantly dishonest, unless there were to be an exact description of the context in which there were portraying the subject matter.

In an earlier story, the Times told us that the "Sex Museum says it's here to educate." Its first curator, who lasted only a few months, explained, "The loftier mission was exploring the sexual subcultures of the city and how they influenced the mainstream."

So what?

What an insult to the culturally rich New York City that excavating gutters and exhibiting depravity is promoted as a "loftier mission."

Typical self-righteous prudery. They're a sex museum. They have exhibits about sexual things.

But the erstwhile curator is not alone in perceiving pornography and sexual perversity as educational. Some of our finest universities are touting courses in the curricula of women's studies, cultural history and sociology that require students to view pornography and study all sorts of sexual practices, then, write term papers about the content as though it was a legitimate focus of academic inquiry. In more than one university, student-made pornographic videos are acceptable as final projects.

A. Sexuality is a legitimate area of study and inquiry.
B. University curricula have nothing to do with the museum.

It's no wonder that a 34-year-old man who graduated in fine arts from the University of Pennsylvania with a business degree from the Wharton School, after having made a fortune in the software business would think that a Sex Museum is a legitimate business. That's Daniel Gluck's pedigree.

So what? He was trained in business. He saw a niche no one else was exploiting. He took a chance, ran his business correctly and now is making a profit.

Once the groves of academia legitimized what once were considered societal sexual taboos in the name of academic freedom, it was only minutes before we had the U.S. government's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developing and disseminating sex-ed material to middle schools that explain how to protect your health while "fisting," "rimming" and performing cunnilingus with your sex partner. (If you don't know what these sexual practices are, call the Sex Museum of New York.)

Irrelevant to the topic of the museum.

And let's not forget the teen-age "health" website called Go Ask Alice, created by none other than the very distinguished Columbia University and recommended to children by the American Library Association. That's where kids can go to find out how to wash the blood off their cat-of-nine-tails after engaging in sadomasochistic sex – among every other sexual perversion imaginable, and some that are unimaginable.

Irrelevant to the museum.

The poison has seeped so far into the culture that a few weeks ago the Tucson campus of the University of Arizona was welcoming pimps, prostitutes, porn stars and exotic dancers into their classrooms to talk with students about "careers" as sex workers, and to demonstrate that working your way through school as a lap dancer, stripper, "escort" or actor in a pornographic film should not be considered shameful. Maybe not. But the University of Arizona should certainly be ashamed of itself!

Irrelevant to the museum.

I urged parents of students to withhold their next tuition payment and alums to withhold their contributions until they got a promise from the college that it would never again allow such a "sexual festival" to be held on the campus. It's because people don't do that – don't speak up courageously and powerfully – that these things keep happening and keep getting more and more outrageous and offensive. Those activists and special-interest groups that gain an advantage from having "all the walls come tumbling down" are well organized and well financed.

Irrelevant to the museum.

(20 people anonymously invested several million dollars to endow the Sex Museum of New York.) The rest of you just avert your eyes while you wring your hands.

They're called 'investors'. They utilize something called 'capital'. It in turn goes into running a 'business'. Why am I not suprised she doesn't understand this, and is unable to divorce this concept and its application to the museum from her problems with the specific course subjects at universities?

I say "you," rather than "we," because I'm on my soapbox day after day, hour after hour, bringing all of this to your attention and "givin' 'em hell," as best I can. Where are the rest of decent Americans?

Giving them hell in a dishonest, meandering and purposefully opaque manner.

If "Dr." Laura didn't exist, we'd have to invent her.

44 posted on 12/03/2002 10:03:14 AM PST by Pahuanui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
I urged parents of students to withhold their next tuition payment and alums to withhold their contributions until they got a promise from the college that it would never again allow such a "sexual festival" to be held on the campus. It's because people don't do that – don't speak up courageously and powerfully – that these things keep happening and keep getting more and more outrageous and offensive.

Evil spreads when good people do nothing.

I say "you," rather than "we," because I'm on my soapbox day after day, hour after hour, bringing all of this to your attention and "givin' 'em hell," as best I can. Where are the rest of decent Americans?

I believe that her reward in Heaven will be great.

46 posted on 12/03/2002 11:00:47 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
Are you saying there is no such thing as human nature?

No, I'm saying that all human behavior is chosen and that is where we differ from animals.

That we are completely blank slates and that we can like, dislike, and desire to act in any way we want?

I'm sorry, but you aren't making any sense.

I agree, to participate in any sexual act is a choice...

Exactly, they chose to behave this way.

...but is the desire to enjoy such activity chosen?

Yes, it can be.

Can you chose to be sexually attracted to a member of your own sex?

Yes, you can. It would, of course, require that you adopt a moral standard completely removed from the norm but it can be done.

47 posted on 12/03/2002 11:28:26 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: luvtheconstitution
I believe that all of us may be born with some predilection for anti-social behavior (lying, stealing, introversion, etc.) but, we aren't supposed to cave in to those tendencies. Rather, we are supposed to learn self-control and elevate our behavior. Just as you said, in large part it's our choices that set us apart from the rest of the animal world.

You could even say that this concept forms the very moral foundation of Western Civilization.

48 posted on 12/03/2002 11:29:46 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC; ventana
Or is your "want" a given to you that you have no choice over?

Sort of irrelevant since it is only the behavior that can affect others, isn't it?

49 posted on 12/03/2002 11:31:55 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pram
And I see you've drawn the ire of one of our pro-homo cheerleaders!

Good job! Some great men are known by the enemies they make.

50 posted on 12/03/2002 11:33:03 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pahuanui
I'm a fan of Dr. Laura but, as you say, she's off-base here. The museum was the original idea (I believe) of Camille Paglia & her partner (a visual artist). They eventually had a disagreement with one of the curators and distanced themselves totally from the museum. If you go to The Sex Museum website, you will see that persons under 18 are not admitted. The museum covers many fascinating topics: 19th century prostitution, "white slavery," and the interesting antics of reformer Andrew Comstock. These are legitimate historical and sociological subjects. Everyone needs to calm down!
51 posted on 12/03/2002 11:36:07 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Destro
That's half as many as your mom has, and one quarter of your grandmom's, isn't it?
52 posted on 12/03/2002 11:41:49 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
Disrupters' common goal is to derail any discussion of the article that leads a thread. I would say the blather accomplished that goal.

Shoot the messenger, ignore the message.

53 posted on 12/03/2002 11:44:24 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

I think you're some kind of deviated prevert. I think General Ripper found out about your preversion, and you were organizing some kind of mutiny of preverts.

54 posted on 12/03/2002 11:46:19 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yakboy
She's right about the ALA and some other websites. I stopped listening to her radio program years ago.

I'll consider the viewpoints on their merits. Personally I'm neither impressed nor disgusted by her persona.

55 posted on 12/03/2002 11:48:00 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger; American in Israel
We must be reliving it as it was in Noah's day before the flood. Sexual sins were probably bad then (perverted), somewhat like now. A lot of the perversion is practiced by heterosexuals.

I'm tired of all the perversion, frankly.

If people had normal sex as it was intended, they wouldn't have sought out perversion. Sexual lust drives one into perversion.

Not all sex is driven by lust.

56 posted on 12/03/2002 11:50:09 AM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Then what is human nature?

Do you mean an animal's behavior is not chosen? When my cat jumps off my bed, he is not chosing to do so? When he walks up to his food and snifs it but doesn't eat, he doesn't chose not to eat?

Are you suggesting that our actions are not caused? That we are somehow removed from the chain of cause and effect? If our actions are not caused, are they random? If not caused or random, then what?

What does "choice" mean to you? To me, it means that we can honestly deliberate on a matter, reviewing each alternative as a real possibility, and then deciding on one of the alternatives. But that doesn't mean our action is not caused. We are not outside of the chain of causality.

If, as you say, the desire to engage in sexual activity "can be" a choice, does that mean that it is not a choice at other times? Does you desire to engage in heterosexual sexual activity "feel" like a choice to you?

Do we choose the moral codes we live by? Do you deliberate on what moral codes you conform your life to? Or is that something that is a given in your life, something that is presented to you and that you deal with as you go about the world?
57 posted on 12/03/2002 11:50:27 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Sort of irrelevant since it is only the behavior that can affect others, isn't it?

You don't think that the causes of behavior affect others? Don't you have to look at the causes of behavior in order to change behavior?
58 posted on 12/03/2002 11:52:37 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
If she is ever in a situation that calls for hauling @$$, it will take several trips, won't it?
59 posted on 12/03/2002 11:52:54 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
There is no constitutional right to act on perverse actions and those include sodomy. That should be enough for you but is it?
60 posted on 12/03/2002 12:10:27 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson