1 posted on
12/02/2002 9:49:28 AM PST by
xsysmgr
To: xsysmgr
bttt
2 posted on
12/02/2002 9:52:39 AM PST by
lainde
To: xsysmgr
"Child" just cannot be taken in its Western definition in Third World nations where the life expectancy is only 41. Sorry. Any realistic look at "child soldiers" would find that - when it was as undeveloped - Britain wasn't requiring enlistees be 18 either.
To: xsysmgr
Wonder what stats he is citing re:Mental illness increase among VN vets?
4 posted on
12/02/2002 9:58:54 AM PST by
donozark
To: xsysmgr
6 posted on
12/02/2002 10:04:32 AM PST by
fporretto
To: xsysmgr
"gun manufacturers have produced ever-lighter assault weapons that can be carried by children."
Some of the indirect messages by the authors are interesting.
To: xsysmgr
The youngest US Marine to die in Vietnam was but 15. Of course it was not official policy to let such young men serve...
10 posted on
12/02/2002 2:34:52 PM PST by
donozark
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson