I see that apparently you are not satisfied with him.
In some ways I am. In some way's I am not.
So, what is it with this WE stuff? You are not a Bush supporter, never were, and the phrasing of that statement is misleading.
This is why I gave you background, because I realized your one dimensional thinking would require more data. I like Bush. I like some of the actions he has taken. In other areas he leaves a lot to be desired. For that reason I could't simply say yes or no to your question.
I didn't say I was a Bush supporter. I said that we have the President, House and Senate we want at this time.
In my response to you I mentioned that I helped organized protests in support of Bush in 2000. You conveniently overlooked that comment. Anotherwords I was glad Bush won over Gore. And I thought it appearant that you would understand that I was glad the House and Senater are now in Republican hands. Thus the word "we" was very appropriate. I'm sorry it doesn't fit into your neat little cookie-cutter mold of how you think I should think.
I really don't care what your motivation was for dumping the Republicans (although I would point out to you that President Bush was the ONLY Republican who asked
Pat to stay in the party rather than jumping, and he was not party to the odious Hitler comments of that weasel Roger Stone), but I do care that you not lead people to
think that you are a Bush supporter "holding his feet to the fire." To leave that impression is a bit dicey, don't you think?
First of all, if you're going to address a political question to me, don't expect me to truncate my answer so you can tee off on it. I provided plenty of information for you to understand my motives and my actions. That you couldn't comprehend or accept them, isn't my problem.
I don't know where you got Roger Stone from, but I witnessed Jim Nicholson, Bill Bennet and Bob Dole make charges then waffle on the subject of Buchanan being the next Hitler. Nicholson made the first definitive statement. Then Bill stated that he wasn't going to confirm or deny anything, but that Buchanan was known to have stepped right up to the line of being a racist. Bod Dole was next to state that he wouldn't confirm or deny racist charges or the title of Hitler being applied to Buchanan.
As for you not wanting me to mislead people, I've made my comments openly and completely on this forum. I'm not misleading anyone. And I'm not making truncated comments so that you can cast them in any light other than what they were intended to reflect.
As long as I am a citizen of the United States and I don't offend the owner of this site, I have a right to voice my opinion here. If you don't like that, I suggest you avoid my posts.
535 posted on 12/01/2002 8:04 PM PST by Miss Marple
I don't suppose you could be persuaded to drop the blue font, could you?
DO, the entire point was that in your ORIGINAL statement, you didn't explain that!! I don't suppose you see that without the background that you provided in two subsequent posts, the impression is far different.
That is all I have to say. You needn't get so prickly...I have had a LOT worse things said to me! Ha!
My big question is, why is he and his administraion basically ignore this titanic, volatile issue? Most in the southwest United States have spoken loud and clear about immigration.
Why are we not being represented?
Why in hell are we being ignored?
(ps........don't ever change your font color either,just knowing it upsets some people brings a ;^) )