Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth About Islam
PatRobertson.com ^ | November 22, 2002 | Ted Haggard

Posted on 11/30/2002 5:55:25 PM PST by Michael2001

(Ministries Today) Our missionaries working in Islamic countries are often shocked at some of the ideas being promoted in the West about Islam. What we hear in the press is a confusing mix of relativistic propaganda and wishful thinking, so I thought I'd clear the air with some information explained to me by my friends working with Muslims in the Middle East.

First, there are 1 billion Muslims in the world--not 2 billion--as many reporters have falsely reported. The most generous estimate is 1.2 billion.

Second, most Muslims interpret the Quran by the principle of nasikh, which essentially means that the later passages supercede the earlier passages and totally negate them.

The Quran was written over a 22-year period. In the early years, when Muhammad's following was small and he was militarily weak, he wrote the 114 verses that speak of living peacefully with others. By the end of his writing, when he was militarily strong and had a larger following, he penned verses that declare that all infidels must be destroyed or submit to being totally subjected and humiliated.

Sura 9 appears at the beginning of the Quran, but it is one of the last texts written. It declares that all infidels should be killed or completely subjugated. These later verses, which overrule the 114 peaceful verses, are what drive the current jihad movement.

According to Muslim scholars, the Arabic words nasikh and mansukh are both derived from the same root word nasakha, which carries meanings such as “to abolish, to replace, to withdraw, to abrogate.” The nasikh (an active participle), “the abrogating,” while mansukh (passive) means “the abrogated.” In technical language, then, mansukh refers to certain parts of the Quranic revelation that has been “abrogated” by the others. In other words, for fundamentalist Muslims, the most virulent passages of their sacred text have priority.

So, when we Westerners talk about Islam by quoting the early “revelations,” we are not communicating the truth about fundamentalist Islam and the Quran but are actually inoculating and misleading those within our spheres of influence against the true nature of Islam. No doubt, a few Muslim scholars have tired to negate the “annihilate the infidel” passages, but their arguments are weak, convoluted, unconvincing and considered non-mainstream to the most vocal and influential fundamentalist Muslim scholars throughout the world.

These scholars are the equivalent of those in liberal Christianity who try to manipulate the Bible to make a case for homosexual marriage or “save the whales” instead of “save the people” ideologies. These liberal interpretations are, to most of us, easily identifiable distortions of the biblical text. Likewise, many Muslims view the peace-loving Muslim clerics the way we would view our own liberal theologians.

Al-Hazar University in Egypt, the highest regarded Muslim theological seminary, teaches the nasikh principle and its inevitable application to jihad. Most of the radicalized leaders have been trained there, including Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman, the blind cleric who is imprisoned in Minnesota for his role in the World Trade Center bombing in 1993.

Simply put, it’s time for all of us to learn more details about Islam. As we do, we’ll discover that the sinister spirit of violence and hatred that inflames so many fundamentalist Muslims is indeed the attitude taught in the Quran.

Article reprinted with permision from the December 2002 issue of Ministries Today.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 700club; arab; cbn; farrakhan; islam; muslim; patrobertson; tedhaggard; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: donmeaker
Silly, I said 400 THOUSAND, not million, are going to mosques each week...

with perhaps another 1.6 million being women, children, occasional attending men, persons on mailing lists locally, attenders of social events, merely curious etc.

41 posted on 12/21/2002 1:41:51 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
the quote was "400M" which usually is Million, but might be if you are french mille which means thousand. Alas, a case of an ambiguous abrieviation.
42 posted on 12/22/2002 2:42:50 AM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Roman numeral M = 1000.

I know of no culture or place where the use of M would imply a million.

43 posted on 12/22/2002 5:42:36 AM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
I know of no culture or place where the use of M would imply a million.

In the US, particularly among people who use computers, "M" is used for million (mega) and K is used for thousand (kilo)

44 posted on 12/22/2002 8:20:11 AM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I myself sometimes use the LOWER case m to mean million, where that would be clear, but the upper case M is always a thousand AFAIK.

Of course it is wise to use these only where the context makes the sense clear, I would have thought that to be the case in the quote about weekly US Muslim worship attendance, obviously that could not be in the Millions, much less the hundreds of Millions!

45 posted on 12/22/2002 7:59:06 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
Engineers routinely use M for Mega..... G for Giga, K for Kilo. You have heard of Kilometers? It is part of the international system of measurement, or SI.

Mega is a million of what ever it is
46 posted on 12/24/2002 4:27:52 PM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson