Michael Savage Nails Vote Fraud!
Dems Promote Voter Fraud
Michael Savage
Friday, March 8, 2002
We have voter fraud running rampant in America.
The other day I went into my local polling booth, gave them my name – old ladies, all liberals of course, from the League of Women Voters, to make sure Republican ballots are treated unfairly.
In fact, they said one to the other, "How is he registered?" They didn't know who I was, and one whispered to the other, "Republican," and the other looked at me with glaring alarm, as if an alien had walked into the voting booth.
Here in Taliban County, not far from Rat Boy's high school, if anyone says he is Republican, I am surprised that they don't call the police, release attack dogs and turn on the fire hoses!
I pulled out my driver's license and I said, "Would you like to see my ID?" The old gray lady with tennis sneakers said, "OH, NO."
I said, "What do you mean, "Oh, no"? How do you know I am who I am? I am trying to defend the voting system."
"Oh, no," she said.
Ladies and gentlemen, in America today we have lost that which your ancestors died for – our sacred right to vote. If you offer your photo ID and have it refused, you will be considered to be committing a hate crime.
In the upside down, Alice-in-Wonderland world ruled by psychotic liberals, voter fraud is now considered a civil right. And if you try to prevent voter fraud, it is now considered a hate crime. The liberals have destroyed our voting system, and I can prove it to you right now and I am going to name names.
I will give you the names of two public enemies with regard to reforming election fraud.
Right now there's a Republican bill in the Senate that would require a photo ID for anyone who wants to vote. Now, we know that photo IDs can be faked, but we know that it is much better than just a signature.
Take a guess which two U.S. senators are trying to block the use of photo IDs for voters. None other than Chuck "Upchuck" Schumer in New York, the ambulance chaser, the man with no shame, the man who looks like he just got out of a courtroom after settling a chain accident for illegal immigrants.
And on the West Coast, Ron Wyden of Oregon is trying to block fixing the voting system. Now, you have to ask yourself why. Why would Wyden widen cheating on votes?
Why would a radical liberal like Ron Wyden – who is tied to Enron's auditor, Arthur Anderson, by the way – widen cheating on votes? What is in it for the radical liberals? Well, the answer is so simple.
I will read you what Wyden has to say. He said, "The 2000 ballot recount in Florida taught us that the goal of election reform should be to simplify the system and make it more inclusive. The narrow photo ID requirement of the election reform bill could effectively straitjacket voters, not just in Oregon, but across the country. That's why I have offered the amendment to allow more flexibility."
Now, the key word here is "inclusive," which is a code word for illegal alien and those not entitled to vote. And the phrase "narrow photo ID requirement" is another giveaway that he is trying to permit illegal aliens to vote, in my not-so-humble opinion.
Ron Wyden and "Upchuck" Schumer should be censured by the United States Senate for blocking voter reform.
For so many years we have screamed, "Stop the illegal votes! Stop the illegals from voting! Stop the vote scam!" And now we know who is protecting the vote scammers: Ron Wyden and Upchuck Schumer.
How you liberals, who claim to love liberty, can vote for these two, I don't know. Wyden wants it to be more "inclusive"? Does that include the Arabs who come here to kill us? Is that what he wants? Does he want to give those who want to bomb us the right to vote with fake IDs? What kind of inclusion do you mean, Mr. Wyden?
I want you to read another thing that Wyden has to say: "The goal of this Amendment is to make certain that overly stringent identification requirements ..." Now, wait a minute, how can you have "overly stringent" identification requirements?
Ron Wyden says, "The goal of this Amendment is to make certain that overly stringent identification requirements do not disenfranchise eligible voters or compromise Oregon and Washington's unique mail ballot systems." Want to take a guess which national organizations oppose the photo ID requirements?
* The League of Women Voters in the U.S., a radical front group * The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, a radical front group * The American Association of Retired Persons, a radical pressure group * The National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, a radical socialist group * The National Council of La Raza, a racist group * The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, an anti-American racist group * The NAACP Legal Defense Fund, an anti-white pressure group
In my opinion, each of the above wants to maintain voter fraud. They do not want your vote to remain sacred. They want to make certain that those not eligible to vote can continue to skew elections and put in power rats and skunks of the type we have now.
What do you do if you wake up one day and find out your country has been stolen from you? You go on the radio and say it like it is and let the chips fall where they may.
I am going to tell you how your parents voted. I am going to tell you exactly what the situation was when your parents voted in this country. And you will learn that identification for voting in America today is still on the honor system.
In a time of total corruption, in a time of war, in a time where we are riddled with 10-15 million illegal aliens, these left-wing radicals still say we need this honor system. Signatures, if taken, are not compared to your signature on file in most places, unless you are challenged by election judges or poll watchers, which rarely happens.
Of course, it might happen if you are a white male and a registered Republican.
When the system started hundreds of years ago, as you well know, the election judges and poll watchers in your town knew most everyone in their precincts. In modern America, this is uncommon. Ladies and gentlemen of the United States of America, your voting system is totally bankrupt. Voter fraud is totally out of control.
The Republicans answering the call of the American citizen have tried to put in a sensible photo ID requirement. The radical left-wing harpies are trying to block even this. They are traitors and should be investigated by the Senate. I only wish we had a Sen. McCarthy to uncover their true loyalty.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/3/8/80235.shtml
Colorado:
This was posted by a conservative on a forum.
October 21, 2002
This guy must be a Democrat.
An Arvada [Colorado] man filed suit in federal court challenging the constitutionality of Colorado's voter registration law after he missed the deadline for registering and learned he is ineligible to vote Nov. 5.
Gee, who would possibly think this was a major problem? Oh, wait:
Proponents of Amendment 30, which would allow residents to register and vote on election day, paid James Annibella's $150 filing fee in U.S. District Court in Denver on Thursday.
With all of the chances you get to register, what with motor-voter and all, how did this moron possibly miss the deadline?
"I am denied my right to vote because of some snafu in the law," Annibella said Thursday outside the court during a news conference by Yes On 30.
No, you aren't, sir. You are denied your right to vote because of a snafu in your idiotic life called "I don't have a clue".
"I couldn't believe it. It's very frustrating."
I'm sure it is quite frustrating to be a moron, but the law is the law.
Annibella became ineligible to vote after he moved a year ago from Denver to Arvada and failed to register under his new address before the deadline, which is 29 days before the election.
Residents can still register if they swear they did not know of the deadline, said civil rights lawyer David Lane, who donated his services to file the suit.
Annibella said he knew of the deadline but has been working 12 hours a day as a financial consultant and didn't have time to register.
Good God, man! When you pick up the change of address forms at the post office, they have a mail-in change of registration form right in the package! (I know...I've used it!) How much time could that possibly take you? In the privacy of your own home, even, and I think it's postage-paid.
What we have here is a failure of civic virtue. If you wanted to vote, you should have registered like everyone else.
Lane said Colorado's registration law violates Annibella's constitutional rights.
No, but his suit violates mine.
Dave Minshall, spokesman for Yes On 30, said 40 percent of people move between elections, and many, like Annibella, are not eligible to vote because they fail to register under their new address.
My heart bleeds. My wife didn't get to vote in our primary in May because she'd never changed her registration (even after living here for nearly two years). She accepted the responsibility and sent in a registration change, and now she'll be able to vote next month.
"It's unfair to keep some voters from voting because they didn't change their address by an outdated deadline," Minshall said.
What's outdated about it? It gives the election officials time to make sure that they have proper records at the polls on election day.
Six states that offer election-day registration have seen an increase in voter turnouts, he said.
And how much increase in vote fraud goes along with that?
Davidson and dozens of county clerks across the state oppose election-day registration because they say it would be costly to implement and invite voter fraud.
Well, duh. I'm not concerned about the cost as much as I am about the fraud aspect.
This suit needs to be dismissed out of hand, and with extreme predjudice. Frankly it smells like a big fat Democratic setup.
Posted by Nathan Brindle at October 21, 2002 05:53 PM
http://www.onemansvote.com/~nathan/archives/000374.html