PRESIDENT BUSH SURPRISES PRO-LIFE LEADERS BY SELECTING KISSINGER FOR 9-11 POST

LifeSiteNews.com ^ | November 29, 2002 | LifeSiteNews.com

[Polycarp]

PRESIDENT BUSH SURPRISES PRO-LIFE LEADERS BY SELECTING KISSINGER FOR 9-11 POST

Kissinger Strongly Implicated in Population Control and Abortion

WASHINGTON, November 29, 2002 (LifeSiteNews.com) - U.S. President George W. Bush announced Wednesday that he had selected former secretary of state Henry Kissinger as chairman of a new independent commission to investigate the September 11 attacks. Pro-life leaders were surprised by the selection given the President's aversion to coercive abortion and Kissinger's close association with it.

President Bush was praised by the pro-life community internationally for his defunding of the United Nations Population Fund due to their association with the forced abortion and coercive sterilization practices in China. However, Kissinger was intimately associated with coercive population control as he is the author of the now-declassified national security study memorandum calling for population control - coercive if necessary, in the third world.

Gilles Grondin, a veteran United Nations diplomat and past President of Le Mouvement en faveur de la Vie/Campaign Quebec Vie, (the pro-life movement in Quebec), told LifeSite that he was surprised by President Bush's selection of Kissinger. Grondin, who with his vast UN experience has been one of the most successful pro-life lobbyists at the UN, points out that Kissinger's memo NSSM 200 formed the basis of U.S. foreign policy in the area of population.

Grondin explained that the Memorandum suggested that competition from new world powers would rise when developing nations had sufficient populations to utilize their national resources to their full potential. Thus, NSSM 200 was about ensuring U.S. strategic, economic, and military interest, at the expense of developing countries, by proposing population control including by coercive means if mere propaganda could not succeed.

For more on NSSM 200 including the actual document see LifeSite at:

http://www.lifesite.net/waronfamily/nssm200/index.html

See Bush's announcement of his selection of Kissinger: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/11/20021127-1.html

[Polycarp]

I didn't " link " to anything. A wee bit egomanical, are you ? Enjoy breaking FR's rules, do you ? YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO LINK TO YOUR OWN WEB SITES / ORGANIZATIONS ON FR !

Bonfire posted a link to our organization, jacka$$.

Not me.

He found it by doing a Google search on Dasshole.

then FR is NOT the site for you .

Apparently it is, or the moderators would have banned me months ago, and the threads I post would get no hits, and no one would respond to them.

Chump.

Thanks fer hangin' with me on my thread.

[nopardons]

Yep, it was a damned bleedinghearted , Liberal screed. Not only is poor Henry the exemplar of the " evil Jew ", but it's up to all Americans to now feed, clothe, and take care of the rest of the world. Goodness gracious, we've been invaded by the Taliban !

[Bella_Bru]

I didn't have them and expect anyone else to feed them.

That's because you are not a socialist.

[APBaer]

"Another working paper has arrived -- this one now moves to feeding people overseas and our farmers!"

I'm thinking of Charles Dickens, and it is not because the Christmas Season has made me reach for my copy of "A Christmas Carol".

Dickens wrote his stories to be published in installments in magazines--and he was paid by the word.
Now why should that factoid come to me, hmm?

[WarHawk42]

Apparently it is, or the moderators would have banned me months ago, and the threads I post would get no hits, and no one would respond to them.

In case you hadn't noticed the only reason we are posting is because you are so funny.  You really aren't being taken seriously.  Gee, that must hurt.LOL

WarHawk42

[SwordofTruth]

Poverty can be defined as too many people for the resources available in a geographic region. When we see humans living in poverty, we feel a certain solidarity with them. Our consciences tell us of our duty to help them out of their misery with food, shelter, infrastructure, and the means to develop their economy.

That's a strange way to define poverty. The way I see it, the people of a country are its main resources.

[nopardons]

Name calling now ? How " adult " , how " Christian ", and how very stupid of you !

You added my nic to the reply, in your post ; I only answered it. What's the matter , not bright enough to understand that your actions have consiquences ? So immersed in religious zealotry and egomania, that you can't tell the difference between a thread mostly composed of people , who are giving you a hard time / disagreeing with you and a thread of commendations, that you think that any attention is a good thing ? Hmmmmmmmmm ? Not very bright, are you ? :-)

As for " hanging with ya, on " your " thread ... I am enjoying watching you implode. LOL

[WarHawk42]

That's because you are not a socialist.

I haven't played one of those on TV either.:)

WarHawk42

[PhiKapMom]

I cannot believe some of the things I have seen written on here! You are doing a great job of countering them too!

[PhiKapMom]

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can you imagine how much he would be getting paid if it was by the word?

Your posts have really cracked me up!

[nopardons]

Well, Charlie didn't write " A CHRISTMAS CAROL " to be sold by the word ; however, you're right about much of his other works.

I have always loved reading Dickens' books, I collect first additions of his body of work, I have read every bio about him. I know Dickens and polycrap is NO Charles Dickens ! :-)

[Polycarp]

In case you hadn't noticed the only reason we are posting is because you are so funny.

No, no, please, You're too kind... Thank you. Thank you very much.

You really aren't being taken seriously.

Certainly not, I'm sure.

Gee, that must hurt.LOL

Yeah, yer killin' me here.

"We're not called to be successful. We're only called to be faithful."

--Mother Teresa

[Godel]

Good bottom line summary of this thread here, sink. Oh my.

Fine, you can work 24/7 and have food taken from your family to support billions of third worlders who are having an average of 6-8 kids per woman.

Freedom is inextricably linked to responsibility, you cannot have one without other, these third world ingrates have no problems demanding we send them tons of food and medicine. Whats wrong with asking them to take responsibility for their actions.

What good does it do to send them tons of food and medicine if they have 6-8 kids? Next generation we'll just have 3-4 times as many people to support. I think its very reasonable to ask that they take steps to reduce their population if they want our aid. This is sensible.

[nopardons]

The Taliban live ( mentally ) in the 8th century. A few posters seem to be living ( mentally ), in the 12th, or so. I can't believe, in this day and age, that some people are still this ....

Thatnks ; I'm attempting to countermand the idiocies, spewed by a very few. You and many others, are also doing yoman work ! :-)

[WarHawk42]

I don't think "it" would get paid that much.  Most of what "it's" posted isn't "it's" own words.  You don't get paid for that.

WarHawk42

[Polycarp]

Yep, it was a damned bleedinghearted , Liberal screed

Yep, just like that first great Liberal, who coined those immortal "socialistic" words,

"What soever you do to the least of my brethren, that you do unto me."

[Godel]

I see absolutely nothing wrong with birth control and/or sterilization if someone keeps having children and does not take responsibility for them.

Exactly, you basically have 3 options:

1. Let them have as many kids as they want, then let the kids starve.

2. Let them have as many kids as they want, then FORCE others to pay for their irresponsibility.

3. Prevent them from having kids they cant support.

All solutions have their drawbacks, but 1 and 2 are definitely the greater evils.

[nopardons]

Now you think that you're just like Mother Teresa ? Counting onb sainthood, are you ? Do you even have an inkling, as to just how ludicrious you are ?

[bonfire]

Poly, if you knew you couldn't feed or support more kids, would you just keep having them? And, if so, would you expect others to pay for those children?

[WarHawk42]

"We're not called to be successful. We're only called to be faithful."

I haven't been called.  Should I be upset?LOL  Ny number is BR549 if you are interested.

WarHawk42