Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts: Arkia Airliner saved by secret defence systems
Ha'aretz Daily ^ | 29/11/02 | Roni Singer

Posted on 11/29/2002 8:52:24 AM PST by the_second_moon

This is my translation from Ha'aretz Hebrew edition:

Weapon experts and intelligence sources claimed today that it was secret defence systems installed on the Arkia airliner, not luck, that saved the passengers.

The Boeing managed to escape from two heat seeking missiles after it took off Mombasa airfield.

"Israel work on plans to defend civilian ariliners from terror attacks since the 70s", told today Igal Eyal from the Hebrew University and a former intelligence agent. "the Mombasa incident looks like a successful implementation of amti-missile technology"


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: miltech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
To: Yehuda; Thinkin' Gal
Great photo, Yehuda. It speaks more than a thousand words.
81 posted on 11/29/2002 12:08:10 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freepersup; All
The 9K32M Strela-2 (SA-7 Grail) Surface to air missile
©Kristjan Runarsson 2002


Synopsis
This is a short history of the SA-7 surface to air missile and its operational history. I will also try to briefly sum up its effectiveness and the impact it had on modern tactics.

Development and performance
It is often claimed that the SA-7 is much like the AA-2 air to air missile a clone of a US developed original, the "Redeye" shoulder launched low altitude surface to air missile. Whether the SA-7 was a transistor for transistor reversed engineered clone of the Redeye or simply broadly based on a captured Redeye is something I can neither confirm nor deny. Side by side both the launcher and especially the SA-7 missile it self certainly look very similar to the Redeye. Whatever its origins however the SA-7 just like the Redeye within NATO quickly became a very important part of the arsenal of the Warsaw Pact countries and other Soviet client states. The weapon was easily portable and could be fired by a single man if necessary although it would usually have been operated by a two man team. It provided even the smallest infantry units with a defense against helicopters, fixed wing piston engined aircraft and even low flying jet fighter bombers.

The SA-7a (9K32M Strela-2) was went into service in 1968, but was soon replaced by the more advanced SA-7b (9K32M Strela-2M) which was to become the primary production model and was produced in the greatest numbers. The SA-7b, differed from the SA-7a by its more potent propellant charge which increase its range and its speed. The SA-7a had a slant range of 3.6 km and an its operational altitude went from a minimum of 20 meters to a maximum of 1500 meters altitude. Its speed was about Mach 1.4. The SA-7b increased the slant range to about 4.2 km and the ceiling to some 2300 meters. The speed of the SA-7b increased to Mach 1.75. Both the SA-7a and SA-7b were limited to a tail-chase and rely upon a fairly crude sensor to lock onto IR emissions from the target aircraft which can be jet or piston engined fixed wing or rotary and were never modified to rely upon other kinds of radiation to increase reliability 1).

The SA-7 was not without its limitations. The infrared seeker head although fitted with a filter to reduce vulnerability against IR decoys was not all that reliable. Because it could only lock on a targets exhausts the operator was left with very little time for the launch procedure when dealing with a fast moving target like a jet. In addition the missile was limited to engaging targets that did not maneuver too much such as hovering helicopters and jet fighter bombers and COIN aircraft on attack runs. The SA-7 was thus primarily deployed in the anticipated path of attacking jet aircraft in order to force them to abandon their attack run and flee to higher altitudes where they were vulnerable to heavier and more sophisticated air defense systems. The SA-7 proved more effective in shooting down helicopters and piston engined COIN aircraft due to their lower speeds.






Combat effectiveness
The SA-7 proved fairly effective against US helicopters in Vietnam until the US crews began to vent the exhaust air into the rotor wash but even then the SA-7 was still able to occasionally lock onto the hot exhausts and engine compartment and remained a threat. The Portuguese airforce like a number of airforces involved in "low intensity" COIN (Counter Insurrection) operations also suffered losses to the SA-7 and had to upgrade its equipment since the SA-7 proved to be able to home in on the hot engines and exhausts of piston engined aircraft like the North American T-6 and other popular COIN aircraft.

During the Yom Kippur war the SA-7 saw large scale service against high speed jet fighter bombers. The Arab states are said to have fired more than 4000 SA-7 rounds against Israeli Skyhawks and other such ground attack aircraft and scored 7 shot down and another 30 damaged 2). This tally reveals another weakness of the SA-7, the inability of its warhead to inflict significant damage to the airframe of a heavy, fixed wing military aircraft unless it scored a direct hit. The SA-7s record from the Yom Kippur war appears to be unimpressive on first glance due to the low proportion of "kills" against low flying Israeli aircraft. The above cited statistics are frequently used to point out the incompetence of the Soviets and their Arab allies. This line of argumentation unfortunately conveniently ignores the fact that many of these 4000 rounds that missed forced the attacker to abandon his attack run as soon as the SA-7 was fired, jettison his bombs, and zoom up above the SA-7s ceiling. Thus the SA-7 thwarted many Israeli air-strikes and forced the Israeli attacker into the domain of heavier surface to air missiles and FLAK guns, a fact who's significance is often underestimated.

The SA-7 was mustered out in Soviet and Warsaw Pact service during the late 1980's. This was however not the end of the SA-7s service life. It is still is manufactured under license in several improved incarnations in a number of countries3). Both these license built SA-7 missiles as well as portions of the large stocks of mustered out ex Soviet SA-7a and b missiles that were sold to various regimes around the world have proliferated to any of a number of Guerilla and Terrorist movements around the world. Although it is still limited to a tail chase the SA-7 both in its enhanced license built incarnations as well as its old Soviet version is still effective enough against helicopters and COIN aircraft lacking sophisticated counter measures. Moreover Terrorist movements like the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Hizbolla and the Tamil Tigers to name a few have increasingly discovered the hidden charms of the SA-7 which despite its limitations can easily shoot down an lumbering unprotected airliner on take off or landing. Unfortunately fitting a Boeing 767 or Airbus 320 airliner with IR decoy dispensers and IR jammers is no more of an option than creating a 15 km militarized safety zone around international airports in Europe and the USA. It is therefore unavoidable that obsolete or not an SA-7 rolled up in a carpet in the back of a van will remain the worst nightmare of every modern day airport security officer for the foreseeable future 4).

Summing the SA-7, the Redeye and their descendants up, they have provided infantry units with a highly mobile air defense that filled a gap in their equipment range. They are effective, cheap and easily portable. The airspace between 0 and 1500 meters was made considerably less safe than it had been until the appearance of these missiles and this even in places where effective guided SAM deployment had been unthinkable before man portable SAMs appeared. The man portable SAM family has also contributed the to lessening the effectiveness of helicopters. On the negative side for Governments all over the world the proliferation of man portable SAM missiles into the black market has also considerably enhanced the fighting power of Guerilla and Terrorist movements around the globe.






82 posted on 11/29/2002 12:10:56 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
check- reloadable grip stock / model SP54 OR: model SP54M
83 posted on 11/29/2002 12:11:14 PM PST by freepersup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: freepersup
Y'all carry on! I must tend to some chores.

I shall return!

84 posted on 11/29/2002 12:14:15 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Thanks- as mentioned previously... UGLY !

The civilized world collectively, has a decision to make:

TERRORIZE TERRORISTS OR BE TERRORIZED
85 posted on 11/29/2002 12:20:12 PM PST by freepersup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Same here- duty calls. Appreciate the intelligence gathering by all- thanks.
86 posted on 11/29/2002 12:22:10 PM PST by freepersup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Hmmmm..my bet is on a Pakistani version..

SA-7 GRAIL
9K32M Strela-2
HN-5 (Hongying 5) China
Anza MKI - Pakistan
Ayn as Saqr - Egypt
87 posted on 11/29/2002 12:59:30 PM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
The U.N. Blue tube, is interesting!
88 posted on 11/29/2002 1:52:58 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: the_second_moon
Bump
89 posted on 11/29/2002 1:55:25 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
I agree with you. Osoma is dead, gone, pufftt! History, never to be seen again. He is a buried deep crispy critter. He can't be found and if by some chance he was there wouldb't be enough to know it is a human body. GONE, HE IS GONE!

But, I agree, for some reason they (whomever they are) want us to believe he is alive, or it is CYA time just incase he surfaces.
90 posted on 11/29/2002 2:07:23 PM PST by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
AHHH, the expert!
91 posted on 11/29/2002 2:09:03 PM PST by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
But, I agree, for some reason they (whomever they are) want us to believe he is alive, or it is CYA time just incase he surfaces.

Count not your enemy dead until you bury him. And sometimes not even then. Keeps you from getting a nasty surprise in the future.

a.cricket

92 posted on 11/29/2002 3:37:22 PM PST by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: cebadams
What Fox News refers fo as a SAM-7 is otherwise a SA-7 GRAIL (see pics).
93 posted on 11/29/2002 5:40:20 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
Right.
94 posted on 11/29/2002 5:40:46 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: the_second_moon
Yep. They have chaffe..........
95 posted on 11/29/2002 7:05:45 PM PST by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper; freepersup; Bobby777
From this article:

Mossad Takes Over in Kenya http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/798118/posts

A missile launcher and two scorched missile cartridges abandoned by the terrorists near the airport were left lying around for more than 24 hours. The Israelis later picked them up from waste ground where they were found.

Mystery surrounds the take-off direction of the charter plane, Arkia airlines flight IZ582, which did not take off in the standard off-shore direction of Mombasa airport commercial flights. Instead it headed inland, allowing the terrorists an easy shot with the shoulder-launch weapon


96 posted on 11/29/2002 7:58:37 PM PST by cebadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: cebadams
Sorry, here's a better link:
Mossad Takes Over in Kenya http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/798118/posts
97 posted on 11/29/2002 7:59:31 PM PST by cebadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: cebadams
I would have that controller in custody. Looks like a setup, based on that bit of info.

I would have them all on the hot seat!

98 posted on 11/29/2002 8:03:28 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: cebadams
Mystery surrounds the take-off direction of the charter plane, Arkia airlines flight IZ582, which did not take off in the standard off-shore direction of Mombasa airport commercial flights. Instead it headed inland, allowing the terrorists an easy shot with the shoulder-launch weapon almost sounds like a helper in the control tower? ... or just bad luck? ... i.e., did the wind change and they altered runway takeoff / landings? (which is not unusual) ...
99 posted on 11/29/2002 8:05:51 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
I would have that controller in custody. Looks like a setup, based on that bit of info.

we're thinking the same thing again ... grab that takeoff / landing controller ...
100 posted on 11/29/2002 8:08:41 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson