Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Say goodbye to the golden land
World Net Daily ^ | November 27, 2002 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 11/27/2002 7:23:35 AM PST by Sparta

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© 2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

That 70 percent fall in the NASDAQ and 25 percent decline in the Dow, and the recession and unemployment they produced, have begun to cause major collateral damage to municipal and state budgets.

The Empire State and the Big Apple are staring at a combined deficit of $15 billion, "a crisis of historic proportions," says the Washington Post. Rudy Guiliani's successor, Michael Bloomberg, has watched his popularity plummet to 41 percent, as he proposes raising property taxes 18 percent, piling $3 billion in income taxes on commuters, raising subway fares a third and putting tolls on the Brooklyn Bridge.

The salad days of the Clinton Decade, when the tough decision facing mayors and governors seemed to be whether to spend surpluses on raising teachers' pay or cutting taxes, are over.

The 2001 recession cost 2 million Americans their jobs. It has bitten into tax revenues nationwide and forced higher spending on social services. The bear market has killed the goose that laid those golden eggs called capital gains. And with the U.S. trade deficit over $450 billion, the U.S. manufacturing base – a cornucopia of tax revenue – continues to hollow out.

NAFTA and GATT, the trade deals beloved of the Beltway elite and the multinationals, continue to suck out of America the manufacturing jobs that were the on-ramp to the middle class. This is a central cause of the crisis of upstate New York, over which our pro-NAFTA politicians so copiously weep.

The fat years are over; the lean years are here. While congressmen may have managed to draw up districts so safe that only one in 20 House races is competitive, governors of both parties will spend this present decade on the endangered species list.

New York's crisis, however, pales beside that of the Golden State. Having spent California's cut of Big Tobacco's future profits – to close a $23 billion deficit in this election year – Gov. Gray Davis is now staring at deficits stretching to the end of his new four-year term.

"Hold onto your wallet," warns Nancy Sidhu of the Los Angeles Development Corp. LADC projects "a deficit of $6 billion this year, at least $21 billion in 2003-04 and between $12 billion and $16 billion annually for the next six years."

Adds the Financial Times, "The near-term deficit, approaching 25 percent of California's annual spending, is the most extreme example of the fiscal blight spreading through other states and down to local authorities." Davis' budget crisis can be traced to two causes: loss of 200,000 manufacturing jobs in two years and the devastation wrought to the software industry of Silicon Valley.

But something more ominous is happening to California, akin to what happened to New York after the war. Folks are simply packing up and pulling out. Middle-class Californians, uncomfortable with the radical ethnic changes reshaping the state and weary of the tax load, are leaving for good. In the 1990s, for the first time in history, there was a net out-migration of native-born Californians. Two million left. And as high-income Californians depart, to be replaced by low-wage Latins and Asians who consume more in services than they pay in taxes, California's deficits will explode. And as Gray Davis tries to salvage social programs by squeezing taxpayers even more, even more taxpayers will join the exodus.

California is inexorably headed for Third World status. Tax rates will have to be raised again and again, but immigrant folks picking fruit, working in kitchens and washing cars do not pay the same amount of taxes auto and aerospace workers did. Somebody has to make up the difference. And that somebody is packing up and heading east.

There is no end in sight to the substitution of a new and different California for the old California we all knew. California remains the first choice of final residence for one-third of the 1.5 million aliens who break into this country every year. In the counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange, poverty levels soared throughout the 1990s.

Meanwhile, the grandchildren of the Dust Bowl Okies who came west in the 1930s, and the grandkids of the veterans of World War II who came after 1945, are moving to Nevada, Colorado and Idaho. In the last decade, 225,000 left for Arizona. And as those states become more Republican, the Golden State becomes as reliably Democratic as Washington, D.C.

The 1990s were good years for Big Government. In Washington and state capitals, politicians bought popularity and re-election with their unanticipated windfalls of tax dollars. Now the spigot has been cut off. The coming budget wars in state capitals should make for some interesting politics.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: kalifornia; reconquista
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Sparta
Are you sure you didn't wander over from DU? It's generally liberals that when confronted with hard facts evade by accusations of rambling, etc.

Homeland defense is estimated to cost 32 billion in fiscal 2003, and possibly as much as 51 billion by 2007. Here's the site address.

http://www.eetimes.com/sys/news/OEG2002061850024

While your enjoying the read, pat your pockets and see if you have that kind of change in them, Jorge would like to know.

41 posted on 11/27/2002 8:10:21 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Thanks for the dead link. Got any other sources? BTW: I responded to your "hard facts".
42 posted on 11/27/2002 8:18:09 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Type it in right next time, it works fine.
43 posted on 11/27/2002 8:37:29 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
It's only because Pat Buchanan said it that it's considered such a heresy. If Ann Coulter wrote the same things (i.e. quoted the very same stats) these personality cultists here would be drooling over the photos of her bare legs and her prominent Adam's apple. I'm no Buchanan fan m'self but I find little in the above article that's objectionable.
44 posted on 11/27/2002 8:50:10 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Actually, New York and California have the most expensive real estate in the country and some of the wealthiest metro areas in the nation as well. If you want to look at a net drain on the national economy, look at Mississippi or West Virginia. New York only receives 60 cents of every dollar that they send to Washington. Trent Lott and Robert Byrd are stealing THIS New Yorker's taxes!
45 posted on 11/27/2002 9:06:54 PM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Pat was a once great speach writer who has become a cult author akin to Edgar Caycee or Carlos Castaneda. His doom and gloom didn't work in the early 90s and it won't work now. Then again, he will still get the senile New York-expats in Palm Beach to give him 3,000 votes next time.
46 posted on 11/27/2002 9:10:52 PM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Watch yourself. Some of us made our livings from global trade and will continue to do so (at least when I get out of grad school).

Free minds, free markets, free society. It's more than a magazine slogan.

47 posted on 11/27/2002 9:12:35 PM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
I'm not a Buchanan fan either, but it doesn't mean he is wrong all the time. The solution is to put the military on our border, round up illegals in country and deport them. Works fine in the Balkins.
48 posted on 11/27/2002 10:19:58 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: willyone
"Very few move here from the rest of the US anymore."

Tell that to L.A.'s new Chief of Police.

49 posted on 11/27/2002 10:42:13 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
"His doom and gloom didn't work in the early 90s and it won't work now. "

Hey, prophets are always warning us. We ignore them to our peril. Pat was right about illegal immigration, stock market bubble, unbalanced trade, homosexual practices are a no-no (Catholic Church already smacked), and also foreign entanglements will bring war to our shores. Pretty good record I'd say.

50 posted on 11/28/2002 8:14:21 AM PST by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Hey Clemenza

In addition to these I want to add. Bush & Clinton saw tax cuts, balanced budget, tax cuts and unlimited spending for as far as the eye can see. Pat was not that 'optimistic' - so who was right.?

YOU "His doom and gloom didn't work in the early 90s and it won't work now. "

Hey, prophets are always warning us. We ignore them to our peril. Pat was right about illegal immigration, stock market bubble, unbalanced trade, homosexual practices are a no-no (Catholic Church already smacked), and also foreign entanglements will bring war to our shores. Pretty good record I'd say.

51 posted on 11/28/2002 8:27:24 AM PST by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
The link is dead, but I think if you read the estimates that have been making the rounds in the media carefully you might find that the numbers being quoted for Homeland Security are not incremental but rather include the budgets being transferred into the department from the various other government agencies. Regardless, it is a major commitment of taxpayer cash.
52 posted on 11/28/2002 8:37:24 AM PST by JonH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
The liberals in Cali and NY may not mind the invasion going on, living in their gated communites, but on the other side of those gates civil war, riots and revolution is on the horizon

Many of us living outside the gates await the days you describe. They shall beg for water and they will receive hell and a glass of vinegar. Hank Jr. got it right--Country Boys Will Survive!

On this day, be thankful for the 2nd as it will be our salvation.

53 posted on 11/28/2002 9:19:32 AM PST by meanspirit77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
A suggestion: stick to demographics rather than economics.

"Demographics"? ¿Habla Español?

54 posted on 11/29/2002 7:31:48 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie
"Very few move here from the rest of the US anymore."

It's a fact, L.A.'s new police chief notwithstanding. From 1990 to 2001, the population of California grew by about 629,000. Of that increase, about 374,000 is accounted for by births minus deaths. Another 344,000 was the net immigation increase. There was a net 89,000 loss from domestic migration - people leaving California to move to other states, thus, as some have mentioned, "Californicating" those states such as Nevada, Oregon, Montana, Utah and several others.

Just like that law of economics which state that "bad money drives out good money", there should be a law of demographics which states that the bad drives out the good, because it sure as hell is the truth, and not just in California. Anywhere in this country that immigration (i.e., invasion), legal or illegal, runs uncheked, Americans are voting with their feet and moving elsewhere, to some other county or some other state. Of course, it's not simply immigration that's destroying once-nice areas; we see the same effect from the "Californicating" itself, among other factors.

DWG

55 posted on 11/29/2002 7:43:33 AM PST by DownWithGreenspan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Si, hablo un poco. By demographics, I was referencing Pat's book "Death of the West", in which he does a very good job of analyzing demographic shifts throughout the world. So I was saying, stick to what you're good at.
56 posted on 11/29/2002 7:50:16 AM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DownWithGreenspan
From 1990 to 2001

That should read: "From 2000 to 2001".

DWG

57 posted on 11/29/2002 7:50:21 AM PST by DownWithGreenspan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson