Posted on 11/26/2002 6:00:08 AM PST by robowombat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robertson pleads for scrutiny of Koran Larry Witham THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published 11/26/2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson said yesterday the news media and political leaders have failed to educate Americans about violence in the Koran and in Islamic history and wishes President Bush had never said that "Islam is a religion of peace." "He is not elected as chief theologian," Mr. Robertson said.
It would have been better for the president to speak only politically about the Islamic world, and not religiously. "It is leading to needless confusion," Mr. Robertson said in an interview with The Washington Times.
Mr. Robertson's comments in the past year have been a major part of the public debate on how a predominantly Christian nation responds to a foreign enemy with Islamic roots. The public would be better served, Mr. Robertson said, if the media would investigate the content of the Koran and what he says are many passages that incite Muslims to kill nonbelievers. But reporting on that, he said, "is not politically correct."
He said that the violence visited on Christians in many nations, such as Sudan and Nigeria, arises from Shariah, or Muslim law, showing that the violent behavior is tied to Islamic beliefs.
Though Mr. Robertson relinquished his Baptist ordination to run for the Republican presidential nomination in 1988, he has taken it up again and describes his primary work as promoting Christianity. For 18 years, his Christian Broadcasting Network had an Arab-language broadcast station in Lebanon, but he said that "it was overrun by Hezbollah," a terrorist group.
"In terms of Islam, I don't think the issues have been ventilated at all in the press because no one has read the Koran," he said. Still, he said civil liberties in the United States are too important to allow the U.S. government the extra powers of domestic surveillance that it is asking for and that law-abiding Muslim citizens also must have protection. "I have never advocated ferreting out Muslims in America," he said. "They are citizens like I am. But if they are funneling money to Hamas, organizing terrorist cells or holding anti-American rallies, they ought to be deported."
U.S. Muslim groups have organized a yearlong project to put a package of books and a PBS video on Islam, all by American authors, in the nation's 16,000 public libraries to promote understanding of the religion.
The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) reports that supporters have sent in 4,219 "sponsorships" of $150 each to pay for the library package, but the number of libraries accepting them is not yet clear. "It's a yearlong campaign, and it will take a year or so to sort that [number] out," said CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper.
Last week, Mr. Hooper said on a New York radio show that conservative religious leaders such as Mr. Robertson were "equivalent" to Osama bin Laden because they want to divide the world into a religious war.
When asked whether Christian leaders would urge killing members of a different faith as bin Laden has done, Mr. Hooper said: "Given the right circumstance, these guys would do the same in the opposite direction." Though CAIR often demands apologies from groups that criticize Islam, Mr. Hooper would not apologize for his radio comment.
He also confirmed reports that a Saudi billionaire, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz al Saud, donated $500,000 to CAIR for the educational push. "I think most of it is going for the library project," Mr. Hooper said.
The report about the Saudi money prompted conservative activist Paul Weyrich, chairman of the Free Congress Foundation, yesterday to say that while libraries have intellectual freedom, the library packages "present a highly misleading view of Islam, spray-painting over the religion's long history of animosity to Western values."
He called for the American Library Association to issue a statement on the problems with stocking a one-sided view of Islam and urged the use of materials written by his foundation's staff. Mr. Hooper said a positive image of Islam is important to protect the civil rights of Muslims in the United States. He cited the FBI report yesterday that "hate crimes" against people of Middle Eastern ethnicity had increased from 28 in 2000 to 481 in 2001 across the country.
Mr. Robertson said he opposed as "bad law" the government's plans, even in a time of war, to electronically track the lives of all Americans. "As the war on terrorism is going forward, the thing I'm concerned about is how much government control they'll have" on Americans' domestic life, he said.
Meanwhile, he said his main business is not Islam but Christian evangelism. "I don't want to change my ministry and become some kind of Muslim fighter," he said. "I don't want to alienate Muslim people around the world," whom he believes want more information about the West and even Christianity.
But Islam is "a deeply held religious belief pushed by mullahs all over the world" as a basis for attacking Jews and Christians, he said. "Maybe we can counter it by American propaganda. Maybe we can counter it by love."
Copyright © 2002 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, its better to leave international relations in the hands of the "talented" who were (and probably still are) aghast at Reagan naming the Soviet Union an Evil Empire.
Sorry, been there, done that during the Cold War. This current war is no different. The "talented" want to do things their way, according to which how things are done is more important than results, style more important than concrete gains.
And if Robertson has actually read the text of the Koran, he is more of an expert than the entire State Department.
It is the goddamdest mishmash and non-sequential hodgepodge of hossshoe ever committed to paper and gives Westerners a headache.
Oh yeah, it also advises Muslims to kill,maim,convert, degrade, tax, enslave, and otherwise be nasty to infidels. But only on every other page or two. To be scrupulously truthful, there are a few verses where it advises Muslims to play nice with infidels, particularly Christians and Jews, until Muslims can turn the tables on the infidel bastards and go with Plan A!
To be fair again, the Muslims also read the Bible! They have to, no one can make heads or tails out of Qu'ran, not even Muslims. The Suras of Qu'ran cover everything from taking a leak to building a house and stockbreeding ... but if the Good Book of Muhammed (May Peace Be Upon Him) has any theme at all, Pat is correct: it's Plan A for the infidels. To deny this, as many "moderate" Muslims are attempting to do, is certainly interesting. I would advise them to go with "allegory," "Arabic Figure of Speech," "Archaic Usage," "Agricultural Metaphor," "Ancient Myths." That sort of thing. Biblical scholars have been doing it for years. Fortunately for them, the Bible is just so much more interesting as literature than Qu'ran, which truly is a sort of J.C. Whitney catalog of violence.
I can see why Pres. Bush doesn't want Americans to go ballistic with individual members of the Religion of Peace (which it is AFTER everyone is converted or dead) but it's going to be very very tough to do if the Muslims who are in America don't clean up their act... and their brother's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.