Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: azhenfud
Re the EPA report: Federal courts are not medically knowledgable to make such decisions and despite the gracious nodding from the smoking community, the court justices often render "quack" rulings. (Ex. 9th Circuit - Pledge of Allegiance)

It didn't take a rocket scientist, nor someone "medically knowledgable," to see how the EPA lied, cheated and committed fraud. You're absolutely right, justices DO often render "quack" rulings, but in this case several EPA scientists resigned because of this travesty of a report. EPA appealed but the appeal hasn't been heard.

265 posted on 11/26/2002 11:06:02 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Max McGarrity
You're absolutely right, justices DO often render "quack" rulings, but in this case several EPA scientists resigned because of this travesty of a report. EPA appealed but the appeal hasn't been heard.

Your absolutely right, Max. And I told him several posts earlier that it took "5" years of study for the Federal Court to make their ruling. It just wasn't an overnight pencil whipping!

295 posted on 11/27/2002 6:27:32 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson