Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: azhenfud
Federal courts are not medically knowledgable to make such decisions and despite the gracious nodding from the smoking community, the court justices often render "quack" rulings. (Ex. 9th Circuit - Pledge of Allegiance

It took the Federal Court "5" years to reach their conclusion, after much research from medical sources helping the court.

108 posted on 11/26/2002 7:45:47 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: SheLion
"after much research from medical sources helping the court."

And with exactly how much protest from the tobacco industry? I would like the names of these "medical sources" that directed the court as such with their "research".

As I see it, it took time before Bubba Clinton and his anti-smoking crowd were replaced with a more tolerant administration. The report you cited was generated under Bubba and thusly was tilted. Again, Federal Court rulings aren't without error - they'd have done the same if the report were overly whitewashed in smoking's favor.

117 posted on 11/26/2002 8:03:33 AM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson