Posted on 11/25/2002 7:47:38 PM PST by Pokey78
Three weeks after Republicans captured control of the government, Americans hold favorable views of the party and President Bush, but they are less enthusiastic about some of the policies Republicans are promoting, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.
They are ambivalent about tax cuts, concerned about Republican plans for Social Security and strongly opposed to the administration's environmental policies.
At the same time, nearly half of the respondents expressed an unfavorable opinion of the Democratic Party the highest percentage with such a view since 1996. Americans said Democrats had failed to offer a plan for the future or a reason to vote against Republicans in this latest campaign, suggesting that the election's outcome was as much a testament to what Democrats did wrong as to what Republicans did right.
In a measure of additional concern for Democrats, Al Gore, who is the best-known Democrat who might run for president in 2004, is viewed unfavorably today by a ratio of almost two to one, despite a weeklong bath of favorable publicity that accompanied his national tour promoting two new books about the American family.
Nearly two-thirds of all respondents, including just over 50 percent of Democrats, said that Mr. Gore should step aside and allow someone else to run against Mr. Bush.
The poll's finding strongly suggests that Mr. Bush's popularity he has a 65 percent job approval rating and heavy schedule of campaign appearances contributed to the strong Republican showing on Election Day. Among those who voted Republican, 55 percent described their vote as being cast in support of Mr. Bush; 37 percent of those who voted Democratic described their vote as being against the president.
The Times/CBS News poll was intended to assess the dynamics of the midterm Congressional elections and to compensate for the loss of data caused by the breakdown of the polling system run by the Voter News Service. This poll is not a substitute for that kind of systematic canvassing of voters as they leave voting booths. Nonetheless it offers a picture of public sentiment in the aftermath of an election that rocked the Democrats and put the Republicans in charge of Congress, while leading to assertions by some senior Republicans that the nation was undergoing a political alignment toward their party.
The findings suggest limits to the mandate that some Republicans have claimed for Mr. Bush as a result of the Republican sweep of the November elections. The poll found that the once solidly Democratic South had a higher opinion of the Republican Party than the rest of the nation, reflecting a geographical alignment that both parties have noted over the last 20 years. But it stopped short of suggesting that an ideological transformation was at hand, given respondents' views on what have emerged as touchstone Republican issues this year.
Those polled did not appear to be particularly happy about how the election turned out: just 37 percent described themselves as pleased, compared with 26 percent who said they were disappointed. By contrast, in 1994, the last time Republicans took control of Congress, providing a Republican counterpart to President Bill Clinton's White House, nearly 50 percent of those surveyed described themselves as pleased with the outcome.
As such, the findings appear to be something of a cautionary note to Republicans, particularly at a time when some party members have warned Republican Congressional leaders against moving too aggressively in pushing the party agenda.
The nationwide telephone poll of 996 adults was taken from Wednesday through Sunday. It has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Mr. Bush remains extremely popular. Still, on a number of issues, there was evidence of public ambivalence or, in some cases, opposition to policies that the White House has signaled it will pursue once Republicans assume control in January.
For example, 55 percent of respondents said they disapproved of the White House effort to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, compared with 39 percent who approved. Nearly two-thirds said the federal government should do more to regulate the environmental and safety practices of business.
By a ratio of two to one, Americans said they thought that protecting the environment was more important than producing energy. By a seven-to-one ratio, respondents said that Mr. Bush believed that producing energy was more important than protecting the environment.
"I don't like what he's doing to the environment, really," said James Stranz, 57, a Republican unemployed laborer from Philadelphia. "I don't think we should be ruining the environment just because big business wants more oil."
Mr. Stranz added, "I support Bush because Bush didn't back down with Afghanistan."
Mr. Bush's enthusiasm for his $1.25 trillion tax cut plan is also not entirely shared by the public. Two-thirds said they would have preferred the federal surplus be used to shore up Social Security and Medicare rather than finance a tax cut. With the surplus gone, 48 percent of those polled said they did not believe it was possible to both cut taxes and reduce the federal budget deficit; 42 percent said they believed it was possible. But the respondents were evenly divided about whether they preferred to focus on reducing the deficit or cutting taxes.
Nearly 60 percent said they believed that Mr. Bush's tax cut benefited the wealthy; just over 25 percent said it benefited the middle class. Four percent said the tax cut primarily benefited the poor. Three-quarters of respondents said that the first round of tax cuts had not made a noticeable difference in their paychecks.
Americans are also evenly divided about whether future retirees should be permitted to invest part of their Social Security taxes in private accounts, as is strongly supported by Mr. Bush and many Congressional Republicans. At the same time, more than half of the respondents said they did not expect the Social Security system to be able to pay them benefits owed by the time they retire.
Despite Mr. Bush's strong standing with the American public, there were glimmers of hope for the Democrats as they begin preparing a case against Mr. Bush for the 2004 presidential race. Respondents were evenly divided when asked if they had confidence about his ability to make the right decisions about the nation's finances.
Just over half said they were confident in Mr. Bush's ability to handle an international crisis, a relatively small increase, considering what the last two years have been like; 45 percent said the same thing when Mr. Bush took office in 2001.
The findings about Mr. Gore would seem unwelcome news to the former vice president and his advisers as he begins what he describes as a final round of deliberations about another run for the presidency. If he chooses to run, he faces what he described in an interview last week as a virtually start-from-scratch round of fund-raising calls, which could be complicated by a perception that he is a weakened candidate.
The poll was taken just as Mr. Gore was riding a wave of nationwide publicity as part of his book promotion tour. Even Mr. Gore's potential rivals predicted that the exposure would improve his standing among the American people.
So far, that appears not to be the case. Just 19 percent said they held a favorable view of the former vice president, compared with 43 percent who had an unfavorable view. The unfavorable rating is among his worst since The New York Times/CBS News Poll began asking the question about him in 1987. Men are more likely than woman to dislike Mr. Gore.
The unfavorable perception of Mr. Gore crossed party lines: about one-third of Democrats viewed him favorably, compared with about one-fifth who viewed him unfavorably. Of potentially more concern to Mr. Gore, just 17 percent of independent voters said they had a favorable opinion of him, compared with 36 percent who described their view as unfavorable.
"I know that Gore is going around now in all these public places and trying to establish an agenda, but I don't believe he can," said Phyllis Snyder, 68, a Democrat from Summit, Ark. "I just don't believe he can win. I think people are tired of Al Gore. I don't they want Al Gore. "
In another follow-up interview, Wayne Denson, 75, a Democrat and retired optician from Kansas City, Mo., said: "I voted for him to start with but now that Bush got elected, I'd rather vote for Bush than Gore. Bush has got more intelligence."
A spokesman for Mr. Gore, Jano Cabrera, said he was not concerned about the findings, saying it was still early in the race. "With two years to go, realistically speaking, none of these measurements mean much," Mr. Cabrera said. "More importantly, Gore realizes that if he runs he will be starting from scratch and will have to earn every vote."
Approve Disapprove DK/NA 2/10-12/01 CBS 53 21 26 3/8-12/01 60 22 18 4/4-5/01 CBS 53 35 12 4/23-25/01 CBS 56 29 15 5/10-12/01 CBS 57 30 13 6/14-18/01 53 34 13 8/28-31/01 CBS 50 38 12 9/11-12/01 CBS 72 15 13 9/13-14/01 84 9 8 9/20-23/01 89 7 5 10/25-28/01 87 8 5 12/7-10/01 86 9 4 1/5-6/02 CBS 84 10 6 1/15-17/02 CBS 82 11 7 1/21-24/02 82 12 6 2/24-26/02 CBS 78 14 8 4/1-2/02 CBS 77 17 6 4/28-5/1/02 73 18 9 5/13-14/02 CBS 77 16 7 5/19-20/02 CBS 71 18 11 6/18-20/02 CBS 70 20 10 7/8-9/02 CBS 74 19 6 7/13-16/02 70 20 9 7/22-23/02 CBS 65 27 8 8/6-7/02 CBS 66 25 9 9/2-5/02 63 28 9 9/22-23/02 CBS 66 27 7 10/3-6/02 63 29 8 10/27-31/02 62 28 10 11/20-24/02 65 27 9
Right direction Wrong track DK/NA 1/83 1 34 59 7 6/83 NYT 1 47 44 9 11/83 NYT 1 47 43 10 9/85 1 46 44 11 1/91 57 31 12 3/91 51 42 7 10/91 33 60 7 11/94 CBS 30 65 5 12/95 NYT 25 64 10 9/96 44 47 9 9/96 CBS 41 48 11 12/96 NYT 39 51 11 3/97 2 34 62 4 6/97 2 37 60 3 8/97 3 39 57 4 1/98 2 44 50 6 1/98 4 61 34 5 2/98 54 36 9 10/98A 46 47 7 10/98B 52 42 7 5/00 48 44 7 3/8-12/01 40 54 6 4/23-25/01 CBS 37 58 5 6/14-18/01 42 53 5 10/25-28/01 61 29 10 12/7-10/01 64 27 10 1/24-27/02 52 35 12 7/13-16/02 42 48 10 7/22-23/02 CBS 39 53 8 8/6-7/02 CBS 41 51 8 9/2-5/02 43 49 8 10/3-6/02 42 48 10 10/27-31/02 41 52 8 11/20-24/02 41 49 10
Approve Disapprove DK/NA 3/8-12/01 52 18 30 4/4-5/01 CBS 48 34 18 4/23-25/01 CBS 53 31 16 5/10-12/01 CBS 53 24 23 6/14-18/01 47 31 22 10/25-28/01 74 16 10 12/07-10/01 75 13 12 1/15-17/02 CBS 73 14 13 1/21-24/02 70 14 16 2/24-26/02 CBS 65 22 13 4/1-2/02 CBS 65 23 12 4/15-18/02 CBS 62 26 12 5/13-14-02 CBS 63 25 12 5/19-20/02 CBS 63 25 12 6/18-20/02 CBS 59 27 14 7/8-9/02 CBS 64 23 13 7/13-16/02 68 22 10 9/2-5/02 54 36 11 9/22-23/02 CBS 58 34 8 10/3-6/02 57 33 11 10/27-31/02 54 34 12 11/20-24/02 54 33 13
Approve Disapprove DK/NA 3/8-12/01 55 28 17 4/4-5/01 CBS 47 40 13 4/23-25/01 CBS 44 39 17 5/10-12/01 CBS 46 37 17 6/14-18/01 50 38 12 10/25-28/01 64 25 11 12/7-10/01 61 26 13 1/5-6/02 CBS 59 29 12 1/15-17/02 CBS 57 31 12 1/21-24/02 56 33 11 2/24-26/02 CBS 54 37 9 5/13-14/02 CBS 52 38 10 6/18-20/02 CBS 56 36 8 7/8-9/02 CBS 56 35 9 7/13-16/02 52 37 11 7/22-23/02 CBS 44 45 11 8/6-7/02 CBS 45 44 11 9/2-5/02 47 42 11 9/22-23/02 CBS 49 41 10 10/3-6/02 41 46 13 10/27-31/02 46 43 12 11/20-24/02 45 45 10
V.gd F. Gd F.bd V.bd DK/NA V.gd F. Gd F.bd V.bd DK/NA 1/87 5 55 26 11 3 10/95 3 54 32 10 1 10/87 4 54 26 13 3 12/95 4 54 27 13 2 10/87B 4 49 26 17 5 1/96 2 49 33 14 2 11/87 4 50 29 15 2 2/96 3 50 30 15 3 1/88 5 55 33 6 3 4/96 3 53 29 13 2 2/88 4 50 30 13 3 6/96 2 53 32 11 2 9/88A* 6 60 19 12 2 6/96B 4 56 30 9 1 10/88C 7 56 24 11 2 7/96 5 56 27 10 11/88B 6 57 25 10 2 8/96 5 58 23 10 3 8/90 1 45 36 16 2 9/96 5 64 23 7 1 10/90 1 29 42 25 2 10/96 6 66 19 6 2 10/90B 1 32 47 19 2 10/96C 6 61 21 10 3 1/91 1 37 39 20 3 11/96 6 64 21 6 2 3/91 1 44 42 11 2 12/96 6 61 22 8 3 4/91 2 40 41 16 2 1/97 7 64 23 5 1 6/91 1 41 40 17 2 4/97 6 62 24 7 1 10/91D 1 31 45 20 3 6/97 12 62 17 6 3 11/91 1 23 41 32 2 7/97 11 62 18 8 1 1/92A - 17 47 35 1 11/97 14 63 16 5 2 1/92B 1 20 46 32 1 12/97 17 63 15 4 2 2/92A 1 16 38 42 2 1/98 16 67 13 3 1 2/92B 1 16 40 41 1 2/98 21 67 9 3 1 3/92 1 18 39 40 1 8/11-13/98 21 66 8 3 2 4/92 1 23 40 34 1 8/19-20/98 25 61 9 3 2 7/92 - 21 41 37 1 10/98A 16 65 15 3 2 8/92A 1 20 40 38 1 10/98B 16 68 11 3 2 9/92A 1 19 37 39 3 2/00 28 60 8 3 1 10/92A 1 18 42 37 2 5/00 29 58 7 4 2 10/92C 2 21 40 37 1 9/00D* 26 64 7 2 1 10/92D 2 21 40 36 2 10/00 25 60 9 4 3 10/92E 1 22 39 36 2 11/00 26 63 7 3 2 12/92 1 31 39 28 2 12/00 CBS 21 65 10 3 1 1/93 1 34 41 22 2 1/01 CBS 14 70 11 4 10 2/93 2 33 36 26 3 2/01 CBS 7 65 20 6 2 3/93 1 33 41 22 2 3/8-12/01 6 68 19 5 2 6/93A 1 29 43 25 2 4/01A CBS 3 65 24 6 2 6/93B 1 33 40 23 2 4/01B CBS 3 58 29 7 3 8/93 3 28 45 23 1 5/01 CBS 4 64 23 7 2 9/93 1 31 44 23 1 6/14-18/01 3 67 22 6 2 11/93 2 40 38 18 2 9/20-23/01 3 50 33 11 2 12/93 1 43 39 15 2 10/25-28/01 3 53 33 9 2 12/93 1 43 39 15 2 12/07-10/01 3 52 35 8 2 1/94 2 45 38 14 1 1/5-6/02 CBS 3 49 36 8 4 1/94 1 49 34 14 1 1/15-17/02 CBS 2 49 36 11 2 2/94 2 50 34 12 2 1/21-24/02 2 50 36 10 1 4/94 3 51 33 11 2 2/24-26/02 CBS 1 52 38 7 2 6/94 3 51 32 11 3 5/13-14/02 CBS 4 62 27 7 - 7/94 3 50 35 11 1 6/18-20/02 CBS 3 56 30 9 2 9/94 2 51 33 13 2 7/8-9/02 CBS 3 53 31 12 2 9/94 3 50 34 11 2 7/13-16/02 2 47 36 13 2 11/94 2 53 33 10 1 7/22-23/02 CBS 3 42 39 14 2 1/95 3 57 28 11 1 8/6-7/02 CBS 2 45 38 13 2 2/95 5 53 29 12 2 9/2-5/02 3 47 36 14 1 3/95 3 52 29 13 3 9/22-23/02 CBS 3 48 37 10 2 7/95 3 58 26 11 2 10/3-6/02 4 39 42 14 2 10/27-31/02 1 44 38 15 1 11/20-24/02 2 46 37 13 2
Better Worse Same DK/NA Better Worse Same DK/NA 9/76 25 30 41 4 8/93 CBS 12 30 56 2 10/76A 18 36 44 2 9/93 14 26 58 1 10/76B 22 35 39 3 11/93 19 24 57 1 1/77 16 27 54 3 1/94 31 17 51 1 4/77 18 31 48 4 4/94 24 25 50 1 7/77 22 22 52 4 7/94 22 21 56 1 1/78 17 34 45 4 9/94 23 27 50 1 4/78 12 48 38 2 1/94 20 26 53 1 6/78 9 58 31 2 1/95 CBS 24 22 53 1 9/78 9 55 34 2 2/95 27 20 53 1 1/79 7 59 31 3 3/95 18 27 53 2 6/79 3 72 22 3 8/95 14 27 58 1 11/79 5 70 24 1 10/95 13 27 57 2 4/80 2 81 16 1 2/95 16 26 56 2 10/80A 14 46 37 4 1/96 13 31 54 2 11/80 8 58 33 2 2/96 14 29 55 2 1/81 4 58 35 3 4/96 14 32 53 2 3/82 16 48 34 2 6/96 13 29 57 1 1/83 21 39 39 1 6/96 NYT 18 22 58 1 10/86* 19 27 52 1 7/96 16 27 55 2 10/87A 12 37 47 3 8/96C 17 23 57 3 10/87BNYT 11 39 46 4 9/96 23 21 54 2 11/87 11 41 46 3 10/96 26 19 53 2 1/88 12 35 51 2 11/96 24 19 55 2 5/88 21 34 42 3 12/96 19 21 57 2 9/88* 15 27 56 2 1/97 24 19 56 1 10/88A* 17 27 53 3 4/97 16 25 57 1 10/88A* 17 27 53 2 7/97 CBS 27 20 52 1 11/88B 14 25 58 2 11/97 CBS 23 19 55 3 1/90 8 36 53 2 12/97 29 18 51 2 8/90 4 55 40 1 1/98 32 13 55 1 10/90 2 69 28 2 10/98A 20 26 53 2 10/90B 3 67 28 1 10/98B 23 21 53 2 1/91 CBS 7 46 45 2 2/00 30 15 52 2 2/91 CBS 8 41 45 6 1/01 CBS 11 39 49 1 3/91 19 32 47 2 2/01 CBS 8 46 44 2 4/91 18 33 47 2 3/8-12/01 7 41 49 2 6/91 23 29 47 1 4/01A CBS 10 43 44 3 10/91D 14 40 44 2 4/01B CBS 9 48 41 2 11/91 8 44 46 2 5/01 CBS 10 44 44 2 1/92A 8 47 44 1 6/14-18/01 9 40 50 1 1/92B 9 45 44 1 9/20-23/01 8 55 35 2 2/92B 13 38 48 1 10/25-28/01 14 37 46 2 3/92 20 26 53 1 12/07-10/01 19 34 45 2 4/92 18 31 50 1 1/5-6/02CBS 26 27 44 3 7/92 12 33 54 1 1/15-17/02CBS 20 33 45 2 8/92A 10 36 53 1 1/21-24/02 18 33 48 1 9/92A 10 33 55 2 5/13-14/02 CBS 31 18 51 - 10/92A 9 38 51 1 7/13-16/02 14 41 44 2 10/92C 12 37 49 2 10/3-5/02 13 39 46 2 10/92D 17 33 48 2 10/27-31/02 17 34 48 1 10/92E 17 32 49 2 11/20-24/02 19 30 50 2 12/92 29 17 51 3 1/93 26 18 55 1 2/93 32 15 51 2 3/93 21 19 58 2 6/93A 13 26 60 1
Fav Not fav DK/NA Fav Not fav DK/NA 11/84A* 59 32 8 1/97 50 41 9 11/84B 60 31 9 10/98B 45 46 8 12/85 NYT 58 29 14 12/98 42 51 8 11/88B 57 34 10 12/17 33 57 10 1/90 63 28 9 12/19 36 59 5 4/90 58 34 8 12/20 36 58 6 6/91 62 28 10 1/99 CBS 38 55 7 5/92 CBS 46 45 9 1/99 CBS 42 49 9 6/92 49 43 8 1/99 41 52 8 7/92* 46 47 7 2/99 CBS 40 49 11 8/92* 47 48 5 6/99 CBS 41 47 12 1/94 52 36 12 9/99 CBS 43 45 12 9/94 52 36 10 11/99 48 43 9 11/94 54 39 7 2/00 49 41 10 11/94 CBS 59 33 8 5/00* 53 40 8 1/95 CBS 53 38 9 7/00B* 54 41 5 2/95 54 37 8 9/00D* 49 44 7 4/95 54 40 6 11/00L 49 44 7 8/95 54 37 9 3/8-12/01 54 39 7 4/96* 43 51 7 6/14-18/01 46 47 8 8/96* 46 47 7 8/28-31/01 CBS 46 47 8 8/96B* CBS 47 43 10 1/21-24/02 58 33 9 8/96C* 52 42 6 7/13-16/02 53 38 8 8/96D* CBS 48 43 9 10/3-5/02 53 39 8 9/96* 48 44 7 10/27-31/02 54 35 11 11/20-24/02 51 39 10
Fav Not fav DK/NA Fav Not fav DK/NA 11/84A* 46 43 11 1/97 55 39 7 12/85 NYT 59 27 14 12/98 56 36 8 11/88B 54 36 10 12/17 56 35 8 1/90 58 32 10 12/19 65 31 5 4/90 54 35 11 12/20 60 34 5 6/91 52 34 13 1/99 CBS 61 32 7 5/92 CBS 46 43 10 1/99 CBS 55 36 9 6/92 49 40 11 1/99 56 37 6 7/92* 49 43 8 2/99 57 32 11 8/92* 57 37 6 6/99 51 36 13 1/94 49 40 12 9/99 53 37 10 9/94 48 44 8 11/99 52 39 9 11/94 44 48 8 2/00 61 31 9 11/94 CBS 40 52 8 5/00* 54 40 6 1/95 CBS 47 47 6 7/00B* 56 39 5 2/95 47 45 8 9/00D* 58 36 6 4/95 48 45 7 11/00L 56 37 7 8/95 47 45 8 3/8-12/01 55 38 7 4/96* 46 47 6 6/14-18/01 56 36 9 8/96* 55 39 6 8/28-31/01 CBS 53 40 7 8/96B* CBS 52 39 9 1/21-24/02 58 34 8 8/96C* 53 40 6 7/13-16/02 53 36 11 8/96D* CBS 57 36 7 10/3-5/02 53 39 8 9/96* 56 39 5 10/27-31/02 55 36 9 11/20-24/02 45 44 11
Yes No DK/NA 10/27-31/02*1 31 49 20 11/20-24/02 31 52 17
Yes No DK/NA 10/27-31/02*1 42 39 18 11/20-24/02 46 39 15
Rep. Dem. Other Didn't vote DK/NA 11/20-24/02 24 25 2 48 2
Yes No DK/NA 8/2-7/80 40 43 17 9/10-14/80 49 38 13 11/7-12/80 43 45 12 4/22-26/81 47 44 9 11/10-16/88 58 36 6 10/28-31/90 53 39 8 5/27-30/92 CBS 52 40 8 1/10-20/95 CBS 63 31 6 9/8-10/88 CBS 60 32 8 11/20-24/02 VTD 02 77 18 5
11/20-24/02 For/Not for the people 11 For the rich/For the poor 9 Ideology 24 Government spending 8 Domestic programs 3 Economy 10 Social programs 7 Taxes 6 Abortion 3 Military/Defense policy 2 Terrorism/National security 1 Other 5 DK/NA 11
For Against GWB GWB Bush not a factor DK/NA 11/20-24/02 VTD 02 35 17 43 5
FOR AGAINST GWB GWB BUSH NOT A FACTOR WON'T VOTE(VOL.) DK/NA 7/13-16/02* 26 16 51 1 6 10/3-5/02* 32 20 40 1 7 10/27-31/02* 31 19 40 10
For GWB Against GWB Policies Policies Policies not a factor DK/NA 11/20-24/02 VTD 02 30 24 37 8
Bush Dem. candidate Don't know yet DK/NA 11/20-24/02 32 18 47 2
Gore another chance Someone new Deprends(vol) DK/NA 11/20-24/02 27 62 3 9
Republicans Democrats DK/NA 11/20-24/02 78 8 14
Pleased Disappointed Don't care much DK/NA 11/27-28/94 CBS 49 24 20 7 11/16-17/98 CBS 42 22 27 9 11/20-24/02 37 26 31 6
10/27-31/02* 11/20-24/02 Health Care/MEDICARE 2 3 Social Security 2 2 Education 11 4 Taxes 5 3 Economy 15 10 Defense 3 1 Foreign Policy 2 3 Jobs 4 - Abortion 2 3 War 7 2 Politicians/Government 5 2 Osama Bin Laden - Terrorism general 2 Campaign 2 Other 20 31 DK/NA 18 36
Better when Better when same party different parties DK/NA 9/89 35 34 20 9/92* 47 31 22 8/95 41 38 21 1/96 43 37 20 1/96* 43 37 20 4/96 46 34 20 4/96* 50 31 19 6/96 44 33 23 6/96* 45 32 23 6/96B* 49 31 20 7/96* 43 34 22 10/3-5/02* 38 44 18 10/27-31/02* 38 44 18 11/20-24/02 36 41 24
Fav. Not Fav. Undecided DK enough Refused 4/99 CBS 40 13 23 24 6/99 CBS* 38 17 22 22 1 7/99 CBS* 32 16 21 30 1 9/99 CBS* 31 17 24 27 1 10/99 CBS* 27 19 30 24 11/99* 34 24 25 17 - 12/99* CBS 37 26 21 16 - 2/00* 32 33 22 12 1 3/00* CBS 42 32 20 5 1 4/00* CBS 35 30 21 12 2 5/00* 40 28 21 10 1 7/00* 40 29 18 13 1 7/00B* 44 26 19 10 1 8/00* CBS 48 22 17 12 1 8/00* CBS 45 27 17 10 1 9/00A* 42 28 19 9 1 9/00D* 43 30 19 9 - 10/00* CBS 44 30 16 8 2 10/00* 49 30 14 5 2 10/00* CBS 48 33 12 5 2 11/00* 48 32 14 5 1 11/00L* 45 36 13 4 2 1/15-17/01 CBS 44 30 17 8 1 2/10-12/01 CBS 42 24 16 16 2 3/8-12/01 42 19 17 21 - 4/4-5/01 CBS 40 29 13 17 1 4/23-25/01 CBS 41 26 18 13 2 6/14-18/01 37 29 16 18 - 8/28-31/01 CBS 40 29 17 13 1 7/13-16/02 64 21 13 2 1 11/20-24/02 55 25 14 6 1
Favorable Not fav. Undecided DK enough Refused 5/87 5 6 13 75 1 10/87 9 9 16 66 11/87 8 10 18 63 1 7/92* 29 6 19 45 1 8/92A* 44 10 16 30 1 8/92B* 39 11 20 29 1 8/92D* 36 14 20 30 - 8/92E* 40 12 19 28 1 9/92A* 39 13 20 27 1 10/92A* 43 16 19 23 - 10/92C* 40 25 16 19 1 10/92D* 43 24 16 16 - 10/92E* 43 26 16 14 - 1/93* 40 7 19 33 1 2/93* 32 12 12 44 - 11/93* 48 17 19 15 1 1/94 CBS 32 15 22 30 1 1/94* 42 15 19 24 1 2/95* 48 24 18 10 - 4/96* 32 21 23 23 - 8/96* 39 18 22 20 1 8/96B* CBS 32 26 24 17 1 8/96C* 35 26 19 18 1 8/96D* CBS 34 24 21 20 1 9/96* 43 24 18 14 1 10/96* 45 26 18 10 1 10/96C* 47 27 15 11 1 11/96* 43 27 17 13 1 1/97 41 12 19 27 1 3/97 CBS 29 18 20 31 2 4/97 25 21 19 35 1 5/97 CBS 29 18 19 33 1 8/97 CBS 38 21 24 15 2 9/97 CBS 21 24 21 32 - 11/97 CBS 31 30 26 13 - 12/97 19 24 24 32 1 1/98B 35 20 26 18 1 2/98 22 17 17 43 1 4/98 29 22 20 29 - 7/98 CBS 25 19 21 34 1 8/11-13 29 22 20 29 - 8/19-20 24 19 20 36 1 9/98 CBS 22 19 22 35 2 9/12 CBS 23 20 22 34 1 9/13 25 23 18 34 1 9/14 23 21 18 37 1 9/98B 24 21 20 34 1 11/98 CBS 22 21 20 35 2 12/98 23 21 20 35 1 12/19 24 21 24 31 - 12/20 27 20 21 31 1 1/99 CBS 24 19 24 32 1 1/99 CBS 21 19 19 41 - 1/99 20 20 23 35 2 2/99 CBS 23 21 21 34 1 4/99 CBS 18 22 23 36 1 6/99 CBS* 17 25 23 33 2 7/99 CBS* 19 27 25 28 1 8/99 CBS* 18 27 23 30 2 10/99 CBS* 22 34 24 19 1 11/99* 25 38 26 11 1 12/99* CBS 24 39 23 13 1 2/00* 30 35 24 11 - 3/00* CBS 34 40 20 5 1 4/00* CBS 34 35 21 9 1 5/00* 34 36 20 9 1 7/00* 35 34 20 10 1 7/00B* 36 35 18 9 2 8/00* CBS 33 32 20 14 1 8/00* CBS 45 27 16 10 2 9/00A* 44 29 17 9 1 9/00D* 49 28 17 5 1 10/00* CBS 46 31 16 6 1 10/00* 46 35 13 4 1 10/00* CBS 45 37 11 5 2 11/00* 45 38 12 4 1 11/00L* 41 41 12 4 2 12/9-10/00 CBS 51 35 11 1 2 12/14-16/00 CBS 44 39 15 2 1/15-17/01 CBS 44 40 13 2 1 3/8-12/01 37 39 14 9 1 8/28-31/01 CBS 31 33 21 14 1 11/20-24/02 19 43 24 14 -
More Less About as it is now DK/NA 11/20-24/02 29 8 55 8
Get better Get worse Stay about the same DK/NA 11/20-24/02 28 23 40 9
Increase Decrease Stay about the same DK/NA 11/20-24/02 40 14 40 6
UP DOWN STAY ABOUT THE SAME DK/NA 11/27-28/94 CBS 42 9 46 5
Better Worse Stay about the same DK/NA 11/20-24/02 20 21 54 5
More influence Less Same as now DK/NA 11/20-24/02 44 6 44 6
More conservative Less Same as now DK/NA 11/20-24/02 42 6 46 6
More likely Less About the same DK/NA 11/20-24/02 55 4 38 4
A Lot Some Not Much None at all DK/NA 3/8-12/01 33 34 20 11 1 6/14-18/01 23 37 21 16 3 1/21-24/02 34 42 16 7 1 11/20-24/02 32 32 22 12 2
YES NO DK/NA 7/00B* 55 36 9 8/00* CBS 58 32 10 8/00* CBS 54 37 9 9/00A* 49 41 10 9/00D* 53 39 9 10/00* CBS 52 39 9 10/00* 55 37 8 11/00* 53 37 10 1/15-17/01 CBS 53 38 9 2/10-12/01 CBS 56 36 8 1/5-6/02 CBS 53 38 9 1/15-17/02 CBS 68 25 7 6/18-20/02 CBS 61 33 6 7/13-16/02 68 27 4
A lot Some Not much None at all DK/NA 3/8-12/01 30 31 22 11 5 6/14-18/01 18 37 19 15 11 11/20-24/02 27 35 20 11 7
YES NO DK/NA 8/00 CBS* 55 28 17 2/01 CBS 54 33 13
Confidence Uneasy DK/NA 7/00B* 46 44 9 8/00* CBS 46 41 13 8/00* CBS 46 43 11 9/00* 46 44 10 10/00* CBS 40 47 13 10/00* 45 46 10 11/00* 46 47 7 1/15-17/01 45 45 10 2/10-12/01 43 45 12 3/8-12/01 52 40 7 4/4-5/01 CBS 48 46 6 4/23-25/01 CBS 47 47 6 6/14-18/01 42 52 6 11/20-24/02 53 43 5
Confidence Uneasy DK/NA 11/20-24/02 47 48 5
A LOT SOME NOT MUCH NONE AT ALL DK/NA 1/21-24/02 39 42 13 5 1
Liberal Moderate Conservative DK/NA 11/99* 13 35 38 14 2/00* 15 33 37 16 5/00* 8 34 43 15 7/00B* 14 27 46 13 8/00* CBS 12 26 48 14 8/00* CBS 11 28 47 14 9/00A* 10 29 46 15 9/00D* 10 26 51 12 10/00* 10 27 52 12 1/15-17/01 CBS 9 31 48 12 3/8-12/01 11 30 49 10 6/14-15/01 13 24 53 10 1/21-24/02 11 41 41 8 11/20-24/02 13 29 47 12
Too much Too little Right amount No influence(vol.) DK/NA 3/8-12/01 22 19 31 2 27 11/20-24/02 22 20 39 2 16
A lot Some Not much so far DK/NA 11/20-24/02 15 34 50 1
Good idea Bad Don't know enough DK/NA 11/20-24/02 23 20 55 2
Have made a difference Have not DK/NA 11/20-24/02 17 74 9
Can Cannot DK/NA 11/20-24/02 42 48 10
CAN CANNOT DK/NA 4/95 44 50 6 1/96 34 56 10 5/96 45 47 8 8/96 49 44 7 8/96* 50 44 7
Reducing deficit Cutting taxes DK/NA 2/95 55 40 5 10/95 60 35 4 1/96* 71 24 5 8/96* 55 39 5 8/96* 55 39 5 8/96B* CBS 55 39 6 8/96C* 55 41 4 9/96* 57 35 8 10/10-13/96* 51 43 6 10/27-29/96 CBS 55 41 4 11/20-24/02 45 44 11
Good for economy Bad Haven't made difference DK/NA 11/20-24/02 20 12 61 7
Good for economy Bad Haven't made difference DK/NA 11/20-24/02 20 12 61 7
GOOD BAD WON'T MAKE DIFFERENCE DK/NA 6/14-18/01 32 13 50 5 1/21-24/02 28 13 56 3
11/20-24/02 Rich 62 Poor 3 Middle income 20 Everybody(vol.) 3 No one(vol.) 1 DK/NA 10
11/20-24/02 Rich 57 Poor 4 Middle income 26 Everybody(vol.) 3 No one(vol.) 1 DK/NA 9
2/10-12/01 CBS 3/8-12/01 RICH 57 58 POOR 3 5 MIDDLE INCOME 25 24 RICH AND POOR (VOL.) 1 - RICH AND MIDDLE (VOL.) 1 1 POOR AND MIDDLE (VOL.) 0 - ALL THREE/EVERYBODY (VOL.) 7 7 NO ONE (VOL.) 0 - DK/NA 6 5
Continue to cut and Not continue to cut Cut not Make permanent and not permanent perm(vol) DK/NA 11/20-24/02 45 44 1 10
Continue to cut and Not continue to cut Cut not Make permanent and not permanent perm(vol) DK/NA 11/20-24/02 37 52 2 10
Tax cut was Better used for best thing Social Security DK/NA 11/20-24/02 23 69 8
Enough Do more Do less DK/NA 2/96 23 55 17 5 8/96* 26 53 15 6 7/00* 30 50 11 9 11/20-24/02 25 62 7 5
Agree Disagree DK/NA 9/81 45 42 13 9/82* 52 41 7 4/83 58 34 8 1/86 66 27 7 7/88 65 22 13 4/89 74 18 8 6/89 80 14 6 4/90 74 21 5 5/92 CBS 67 29 5 10/92C 52 40 8 6/96 57 37 5 11/97 57 36 7 3/8-12/01 61 33 6 6/14-18/01 57 38 5 1/21-24/02 56 39 4 11/20-24/02 57 36 7
Better Worse Stay about the same DK/NA 11/20-24/02 10 27 59 4
Approve Disapprove DK/NA 2/10-12/01 CBS 42 50 8 3/8-12/01 36 57 6 4/23-25/01 CBS 37 54 9 11/20-24/02 39 55 6
Approve Disapprove DK/NA 11/20-24/02 40 52 7
Yes No Already get SS(vol.) DK/NA 6/81 30 54 - 15 1/83 27 58 6 6 1/90 36 52 - 12 1/92C 40 53 - 7 3/95A 35 53 - 12 2/96 27 60 8 5 10/96 CBS 36 54 10 10/96 CBS 32 55 7 6 1/97 CBS 32 54 9 5 8/97 CBS 26 58 9 7 5/11/99 CBS 29 55 8 8 5/10-13/00 41 45 7 7 2/10-12/01 39 48 6 7 3/8-12/01 37 49 9 5 6/14-18/01 30 56 8 6 8/28-31/02 CBS 35 53 8 4 1/15-17/02 CBS 34 46 10 11 11/20-24/02 28 55 9 8
Good idea Bad idea DK/NA 5/00 51 45 4 10/00* CBS 50 42 8 6/14-18/01 48 46 6 8/28-31/01 CBS 52 43 5 1/15-17/02 CBS 54 39 7 11/20-24/02 48 46 6
Gov. responsibility Not gov. DK/NA 5/00 8 89 2 6/14-18/01 9 88 2 8/28-31/01 CBS 12 85 3 1/15-17/02 CBS 10 85 5 11/20-24/02 12 85 3
Producing energy Protecting the environment DK/NA 7/77 30 51 19 7/79 41 43 16 2/10-12/01 CBS 32 56 16 3/8-12/01 29 61 9 4/4-5/01 CBS 29 61 10 4/23-25/01 CBS 28 58 14 5/10-12/01 CBS 32 58 10 6/14-18/01 29 55 15 8/28-31/01 CBS 27 59 14 11/20-24/02 29 57 14
Producing energy Protecting the environment DK/NA 4/4-5/01 CBS 65 9 26 4/23-25/01 CBS 70 12 18 5/10-12/01 CBS 66 12 22 6/14-18/01 71 12 17 8/28-31/01 CBS 69 16 15 11/20-24/02 68 11 22
Reviewed/confirmed quickly Take time DK/NA 11/20-24/02 26 70 4
Reviewed/confirmed quickly Take time DK/NA 11/20-24/02 24 73 3
More Not conservative About conservative enough right DK/NA 5/10-12/011 28 16 46 10 6/14-18/011 31 14 47 9 11/20-24/02 29 11 50 9
No tax on Tax only on &nbps; any estate large estates Tax all estates(vol.) DK/NA 11/20-24/02 41 54 2 4
No tax on Tax only on any estate large estates Tax all estates(vol.) DK/NA 11/20-24/02 44 47 2 6
Has a clear plan Reacting to events DK/NA 9/2-5/02 39 52 9 10/3-5/02 41 54 5 10/27-31/02 42 49 8 11/20-24/02 45 48 6
Fail to enact Laws are excessive Neither (vol.) DK/NA 9/13-17/011 39 34 10 17 12/7-10/01 43 45 2 10 11/20-24/02 40 44 3 13
Willing Not willing DK/NA 9/13-14/01 39 53 9 9/20-23/01 45 51 4 12/7-10/01 31 65 4 11/20-24/02 33 62 5
More authority Violate rights DK/NA 11/20-24/02 43 50 7
Approve Disapprove DK/NA 2/24-26/02 CBS 74 18 8 6/18-20/02 CBS 70 20 10 7/8-9/02 CBS 73 21 6 8/6-7/02 CBS 66 26 8 9/2-5/02 68 24 8 10/3-5/02 67 27 5 10/27-31/02 64 25 11 11/20-24/02 70 23 6
End up Resolved Fighting without fighting DK/NA 8/16-19/90 39 51 9 9/10/90 CBS 27 64 9 10/8-10/90 43 47 10 11/13-15/90 51 36 13 12/9-11/90 44 44 12 1/5-7/91 57 31 12 1/11-13/91 66 26 7 10/16-18/94 CBS 35 57 8 9/2-5/02 74 19 7 9/22-23/02 CBS 78 17 5 10/3-5/02 70 24 6 10/27-31/02 68 25 7 11/20-24/02 69 24 7
Favor Oppose DK/NA 9/2-5/02 50 38 12 9/22-23/02 CBS 57 33 10 10/3-5/02 54 37 9 10/27-31/02 49 41 10 11/20-24/02 51 40 8
FAVOR OPPOSE DK/NA 2/19-21/98 53 37 10
Favor Oppose DK/NA 9/2-5/02 49 44 8 10/3-5/02 49 44 7 10/27-31/02 42 48 10 11/20-24/02 48 46 6
Better Worse Same DK/NA 10/3-5/02 23 37 31 10 10/27-31/02 21 45 28 6 11/20-24/02 25 42 26 7
Increase Decrease About the same DK/NA 9/22-23/02 CBS 44 18 34 4 10/3-5/02 50 16 32 2 10/27-31/02 59 12 26 3 11/20-24/02 64 9 23 4
Will keep promise Will not DK/NA 11/20-24/02 14 80 6
Favor Oppose DK/NA 12/7-10/01 74 19 8 11/20-24/02 66 26 7
Very Somewhat Not very Not at all DK/NA 9/20-23/01 36 42 16 4 2 10/8/01 CBS 46 39 8 3 4 10/25-28/01 53 35 8 2 3 12/7-10/01 23 50 19 5 3 1/5-6/02 CBS 18 47 27 6 2 1/21-24/02 23 48 21 4 3 2/24-26/02 CBS 18 44 29 5 4 4/1-2/02 CBS 28 46 17 5 4 4/15-18/02 CBS 21 46 22 7 4 5/13-14/02 CBS 25 47 21 4 3 5/19-20/02 CBS 33 41 17 6 3 6/18-20/02 CBS 36 45 13 3 3 7/8-9/02 CBS 30 43 22 4 1 7/13-16/02 27 47 20 4 3 9/2-5/02 23 46 23 5 3 10/27-31/02 27 47 15 7 3 11/20-24/02 27 50 15 6 2
Yes No DK/NA 9/11/01 CBS 43 56 1 9/12/01 CBS 36 62 2 9/13-14/01 39 59 2 9/20-23/01 32 66 1 10/8/01 CBS 30 69 1 10/25-28/01 26 71 2 12/7-10/01 24 75 1 1/5-6/02 CBS 22 77 1 6/18-20/02 CBS 29 70 1 9/2-5/02 25 74 1 10/27-31/02 32 67 1 11/20-24/02 30 69 1
Very Somewhat Not too Not at all DK/NA 10/8/01 CBS1 38 38 16 5 3 10/25-28/011 28 42 20 7 2 12/7-10/011 37 41 15 6 1 1/5-6/02 CBS1 34 42 15 7 2 1/15-17/02 CBS1 34 38 19 8 1 1/21-24/021 29 44 17 8 2 2/24-26/02 CBS1 22 42 21 12 3 6/18-20/02 CBS1 18 41 24 15 2 9/2-5/022 15 34 32 16 3 9/22-23/02 CBS3 17 41 25 12 3 11/20-24/023 15 38 30 15 2
Will have won Will not have won Mixed (vol.) DK/NA 1/5-6/02 CBS 28 60 4 8 1/15-17/02 CBS 29 56 6 9 1/21-24/02 31 61 2 7 2/24-26/02 CBS 32 59 3 6 5/13-14/02 CBS 23 67 4 6 6/18-20/02 CBS 22 65 4 9 9/2-5/02 27 61 3 9 9/22-23/02 CBS 30 60 1 9 11/20-24/02 27 62 2 8
Alive Dead DK/NA 1/5-6/02 CBS 88 5 7 2/24-26/02 CBS 82 12 6 5/13-14/02 CBS 81 12 7 6/18-20/02 CBS 80 12 8 9/2-5/02 77 15 8 11/20-24/02 88 7 6
U.S. and allies Neither side Terrorists DK/NA 10/27-31/02 37 42 16 4 11/20-24/02 32 44 19 6
Terrorists Neither side U.S. and allies DK/NA 10/27-31/02 13 51 30 7 11/20-24/02 21 42 31 6
I would bet real money that no more than three out of every ten people surveyed could coherently describe even one Republican (or DemonRat) policy on either Social Security or the environment.Precisely. Were this poll taken in 1965, we have the same results: "Positive Ratings for Johnson If Not His Policy" -- if the Times wanted to put it that way, that is.
The full court press is on. The Washington (com)Post ran a similar front page story yesterday. I won't bother with a link... something like "GOP to Press Domestic Agenda".
What they will do is attack where they believe the Administration to be weakest. They can't anymore call him dumb. They can't anymore call him unelected. They can't anymore call him weak, vacillating, and all kinds of other lies. So they'll try to ressurrect New Gingrich and go after the GOP Congress.
It's not a bad strategy. What results do you imagine our pollsters would get in 1965 had they asked respondents, "Do you believe the Government should create a 300,000 employee bureaucracy that costs $5 for every $1 it spends to eleminate poverty but that actually entrenches it by creating welfare dependency?"
"Uhh... no?"
You could do that any time, over any policy. There is no love for Congress. There is no moral uplift in law making. It's all in the rhetoric around it. Let's see who can win this one. We've still got a fight.
Mine too, but that should make your life easier, not harder. All you need to do is deconstruct the articles, and make your questions, pointed, and impossible to refute logically. Your professors will fall back on a non logical argument, make your point, let them win, and collect your 4.0
Probably because most of them don't pay a lot of Federal taxes to begin with...
Of course they don't ... recall that the bottom 40-45% of wage earners pay NO federal income taxes at all. This is the base of the respondents of these polls. Never forget that.
Well, I am not sure that _I_ would say I am happy with the results of the election, either. I don't think I will be able to say that until we have a filibuster-proof Senate and control of all branches in conservative/constitutional hands and part of the platform of winning candidates was their willingness to impeach "judicial activist" judges.
I guess as of today I would go so far as to say I am "cautiously optimistic" about the changes in the makeup of the federal gov't...
OH... Important aspect of this "poll"... The respondents who 'voted for Republican/Democrat congressman' came out 48/50% in this poll, as opposed to the actual 52/46% election results... so you can see they have a bit of a Demodog bias built in here. Intentional??? ... naaaahh...
Interesting.
"I don't like what he's doing to the environment, really," said James Stranz, 57, a Republican unemployed laborer from Philadelphia. "I don't think we should be ruining the environment just because big business wants more oil."It's not big business that wants more oil. It's us.
But I thought this was the most astonishing quote of all:
Americans are also evenly divided about whether future retirees should be permitted to invest part of their Social Security taxes in private accounts, as is strongly supported by Mr. Bush and many Congressional Republicans. At the same time, more than half of the respondents said they did not expect the Social Security system to be able to pay them benefits owed by the time they retireIf the money isn't going to be there from the government, isn't it common sense to want a private account that you control?
Strange.
D
Exactly my reaction -- if I was asked this question -- I would have to say I was not completely happy about the election results -- but for the same reasons you stated here (esp. NJ and SD) -- also displeased that my state elected a Dem. governor
It never occurs to these geniuses that big business is better off with the status quo than with regime change in Iraq.
As long as Hussein is in power, the embargo will be in place, which means that his oil will be kept off the US market.
This allows energy companies to charge more for their product than they would if Iraq was a democracy and Iraqi oil was flooding the US market.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.