Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevin Curry
If Lowe's wanted to pass anti-obesity rules, are you suggesting the company shouldn't be allowed to? By what authority? The Americans with Disabilities Act?

Hey! They can pick and choose whomever they want to hire. But they should have set down ground rules before they started the hiring process. Changing rules in midstream is not right. What choice do these people have now? They are being forced into something they do not want, and it's just going to add to more misery or hating to go to work.

They are going to sneak cigarettes in places that might not be in a safe area. I think it's terrible.

Also, what about the Anti-Discrimination Act? This is discrimination.

78 posted on 11/25/2002 7:00:39 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: SheLion
How can you discriminate against a behavior? Are you saying you have no choice in your actions? Is business never able to set its own standards? Show me where in the job application it states that Lowe's will never change their work rules.
79 posted on 11/25/2002 7:03:19 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
They aren't being "forced" into anything. They can quit and find other work if they don't like the new rules. Lowe's can't force them to stay.

I suggest smokers form their own home project/improvement chain and make it a foundational company policy that employees are allowed to smoke anywhere, at anytime, and for as long as they want. Let's call the chain "The Duke's Home Improvement" in honor of the legendary one-lunged chain-smoking John Wayne.

Quit whining and win this fight the American way.

81 posted on 11/25/2002 7:10:57 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson