Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: JohnHuang2
"If we don't do something about their status, we will be admitting that our country has a permanent underclass," Mr. Garza said.
Once again, as with the PLO and Israel, granting the criminals concessions as a reward for their behavior. This type of 'compassionate conservatism' is not wise. In fact, 'compassionate conservatism' seems a joke. 'Liberal light' is more like it.
To: JohnHuang2
I am absolutely and unequivocally against more amnesty. Bush will lose support--more than he gains in Hispanic votes, and he will make millions of new Democrat voters. They will vote Dem. even if just LEGAL aliens instead of illegal or citizens.
Surely most Hispanic Americans can see this, or can they.
vaudine
149 posted on
11/23/2002 9:56:55 AM PST by
vaudine
To: JohnHuang2
Those who defended this nation with their blood to fight to end the wars and start the peace, are spinning in their graves as we let potential trouble making people come here in sloppy ways.
To: JohnHuang2
I can't believe why people still support this guy. Amnesty for illegals is incredible. All the while they build a database to keep track of your every movement. There is no enforeceable Bill Of Rights. This is absolutely unbelievable. This can't continue at this pace.
166 posted on
11/23/2002 10:34:37 AM PST by
DaGman
To: JohnHuang2
If true, disgusting. Tried by Ronald Reagan to "end all" illegal immigration. The opposite happened. If conservatives have to win by encouraging and supporting an invasion of illegals, what will our end "prize" be? More "legalized" illegals who then vote for a further round of amnesty for chain relatives.
To: JohnHuang2
Actually, amnesty is not a bad idea.
As long as there is a significant reform with our immigration, and the fact that we are able to control the borders.
Also, this is a good way to "reach out" to the Hispanics.
We cannot afford to alienate the growing voting block.
To: JohnHuang2
If he does I won't be voting for him in the next election.
To: JohnHuang2
son of a bitch (not YOU, John, someone else I am thinking of today as I read this)
To: JohnHuang2
Bad as this is (and exceedingly irresponsible, IMO), what's to stop the other country leaders representing their own illegals to demand the same thing like V. Fox?
I'm anticipating a tidal wave of 'equal treatment' for all illegals from a dozen countries, not the least of which will be Middle Eastern nations. On what grounds can they then be denied their own amnesty?
Homeland Security my @$$.
449 posted on
11/24/2002 4:45:54 AM PST by
Paulie
To: JohnHuang2
To: JohnHuang2
The Clintonistas could never deliver the conservatives to the NWO
To: JohnHuang2
Social Workers delight
They are all minorities..there for all the affirmative action goodies apply
Education..job entitlement...low cost tax payer funded loan programs for housing and anything else they can pad on...
Of course the default rate wont be bad...who cares let the taxpayers handle it...
Move their gangs into all the nice neighborhoods...
America will have to become a police state in order to control the internal crime wave ..
Americans will be disarmed..
Voila NWO
Just like England..using the same technique...immigration of rabble...proving that the lower classes cannot handle freedom..and must be ruled with an iron fist
To: JohnHuang2
Amnesty? Sounds like we need plenty of "mnesty" here.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson