I'm just a wild and crazy guy.
Posted on 11/22/2002 9:09:10 PM PST by forsnax5
In his day, Chip Arp was a quintessential observer. The work he did with Allan Sandage, and the work that he did on the Arp Peculiar Galaxies Catalog was very quite good, after all, it helped launch the field that is the lynchpin of "sexy astronomy": Extragalactic Astronomy, and Cosmology.
However, as a theorist and as a statistician, both Arp and Tifft have been guilty of some pretty major statistical blunders and misapproximations--and not knowing when to quit. With the confirmation of the existence of cosmological effects like the Lyman Alpha Forest, as well as the confirmation of the Gunn-Peterson Trough at high redshifts, any hope of a non-cosmological origin of quasars is pretty much done in.
Consider this: Why isn't the Lyman Alpha Forest quantized?
It
Well I would say that the arguments put forth by evolutionists are much worse, ie, I know that evolution occured...I can't tell you how, but there go those crazy creationists again....
I am still very much an "inflationary universe" "Big Bang" kind of gal, but I am also troubled by the out-of-hand dismissal of some original thinking.
Truly, no mortal being has all the answers and even the greatest minds blunder now and again, e.g. Einstein's cosmological constant. I suspect some may start with a great idea and then become too enthused to "make it so" causing the idea to be "back-burnered."
Why isn't the Lyman Alpha Forest quantized?
You might find this interesting:
Observational Cosmology - Students for the Exploration and Development of Space:
For lurkers interested in Tifft etc.: Redshift Quantization and Quantum Cosmology
I have one comment. The study tested mutations on the function of motility, not for specific protein action. The Mot proteins have at least three functional domains. One is the proton pump, one is the torque producing region and another, which may be found in several stretches of the protein, is the anchor to membrane and neighboring proteins. The mutations tested appear to be for only one of those functional regions.
[rollin' my eyes back]
Oh brother. :-)
I'm just a wild and crazy guy.
I'm beginning to see that. In a good way, of course. :-)
On NOW at RadioFR!
Doug from Upland interviews JAYNA DAVIS discussing the OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING
No, because you already know in advance that they differ in ways that are going to affect the results. ExbB codes for three membrane segments, motA codes for four. Right off the bat that's going to skew the percentage of correspondences in a way that really isn't particularly revealing or useful.
Essentially, you're putting two different fruit baskets side by side and trying to compare them. You're much better off if you break them down into their smallest functional subunits, and then compare those. That way, you can pull out an apple from each basket and compare them directly, rather than comparing the bunch and watching the correspondences get lost in the noise created by the fact that one basket has a banana where the other has a pear, and the second has two oranges where the first has none. Apples to apples ;)
Physics News 481, April 27, 2000
The 36-member, international "Boomerang" (Balloon Observations of Millimetric Extragalactic Radiation and Geomagnetics) collaboration, led by Andrew Lange of Caltech and Paolo de Bernardis of the University of Rome, confirms that a plot of CMB strength peaks at a multipole value of about 197 (corresponding to CMB patches about one degree in angular spread), very close to what theorists had predicted for a cosmology in which the universe's overall curvature is zero and the existence of cold dark matter is invoked. The absence of any noticeable subsidiary peaks (higher harmonics) in the data, however, was not in accord with theory.
The shape of the observed pattern of temperature variations suggests that a disturbance very like a sound wave moving through air passed through the high- density primordial fluid and that the CMB map can be can be thought of as a sort of sonogram of the infant universe. (de Bernardis et al., Nature, 27 April 2000.)
The results were presented as plots of slight temperature variations in the CMB that graph sound waves in the dense early universe. These high-resolution "power spectra" show not only a strong primary resonance but are consistent with two additional harmonics, or peaks.
Because this information fits nicely with my "take" on origins, I'm also posting it to the Freeper View on Origins thread.
What? That is the purpose of measuring. Then an exact correspondance of the functional part means they are the same.
Apples to Apples and Fruit baskets to fruit baskets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.