I am still very much an "inflationary universe" "Big Bang" kind of gal, but I am also troubled by the out-of-hand dismissal of some original thinking.
Truly, no mortal being has all the answers and even the greatest minds blunder now and again, e.g. Einstein's cosmological constant. I suspect some may start with a great idea and then become too enthused to "make it so" causing the idea to be "back-burnered."
Why isn't the Lyman Alpha Forest quantized?
You might find this interesting:
Observational Cosmology - Students for the Exploration and Development of Space:
For lurkers interested in Tifft etc.: Redshift Quantization and Quantum Cosmology
Physics News 481, April 27, 2000
The 36-member, international "Boomerang" (Balloon Observations of Millimetric Extragalactic Radiation and Geomagnetics) collaboration, led by Andrew Lange of Caltech and Paolo de Bernardis of the University of Rome, confirms that a plot of CMB strength peaks at a multipole value of about 197 (corresponding to CMB patches about one degree in angular spread), very close to what theorists had predicted for a cosmology in which the universe's overall curvature is zero and the existence of cold dark matter is invoked. The absence of any noticeable subsidiary peaks (higher harmonics) in the data, however, was not in accord with theory.
The shape of the observed pattern of temperature variations suggests that a disturbance very like a sound wave moving through air passed through the high- density primordial fluid and that the CMB map can be can be thought of as a sort of sonogram of the infant universe. (de Bernardis et al., Nature, 27 April 2000.)
The results were presented as plots of slight temperature variations in the CMB that graph sound waves in the dense early universe. These high-resolution "power spectra" show not only a strong primary resonance but are consistent with two additional harmonics, or peaks.
Because this information fits nicely with my "take" on origins, I'm also posting it to the Freeper View on Origins thread.