You choose to somewhat arrogantly and glibly dismiss whatever the memo may say as totally immaterial without support except some vague, extremely tenuous association with an entirely different planet and entirely different order of artifact. Hmmmm. Given that you confess to having no access to the doctored enhanced photo/memo in question, I don't see how you've got much of a case here, either.
The hooraw about the "Face on Mars" is a perfect analog to this bit of tripe. From a single picture with suggestive shadows -- and subsequent enhancements of the picture to make it more face-like -- was launched a huge industry for tinfoilers.
But, alas, it was merely a Martian hillside:
Seen from the side, it's even less amazing:
I found the memo analysis on the show very interesting and perhaps convincing--it takes a fair amount of time and different sources to leave me solidly convinced about most things--but it was still convincing to a degree.
The Mars face--I'm no expert--I've been on both sides of the issue.
But it is interesting that credible sources in Greer's project assert that there are ancient buildings on the moon and Mars and some of the other moons in the system. Some insist some of the bases may be active.
And I'm most convinced from your posts that your bias overwhelmingly controls your logic and perceptions.