I found the memo analysis on the show very interesting and perhaps convincing--it takes a fair amount of time and different sources to leave me solidly convinced about most things--but it was still convincing to a degree.
The Mars face--I'm no expert--I've been on both sides of the issue.
But it is interesting that credible sources in Greer's project assert that there are ancient buildings on the moon and Mars and some of the other moons in the system. Some insist some of the bases may be active.
And I'm most convinced from your posts that your bias overwhelmingly controls your logic and perceptions.
And I'm most convinced from your posts that your bias overwhelmingly controls your logic and perceptions. So some guy merely tells you about his alleged enhancement of a document, and because his supposed results suit your preconceived notions, that's proof enough for you.
The fact that it's EXTREMELY unlikely that the good general would be waving the document around in the first place is apparently immaterial, as is the fact that you cannot actually produce a copy of the enhanced document with which to convince us skeptics.
All in all, and in full consideration of your previous posts on this thread, at best I can say you've performed wonderfully in the service of sarcasm. At worst (i.e., you're serious), well ... let's just hope you're funnin' us.