Posted on 11/22/2002 4:38:16 PM PST by RonDog
Nationally syndicated "center right" conservative talk show host Hugh Hewitt
has confirmed today that
Michelle Malkin
will be a guest on the "Hugh Hewitt" radio program:
MONDAY (11/25/02)
5:20 pm (California time)
8:20 pm (East coast time)
Michelle's interview on the Hugh Hewitt show is timed to co-ordinate with her personal appearances in southern California to promote her new book, Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores:You can LISTEN LIVE to Hugh's show over the Internet (or find a local station that carries his show) from his website, at:Like FR founder Jim Robinson, Hugh is apprehensive about the damage that the "immigration reform" movement can do to the "mainstream" image of the national Republican party, and has concerns that the leftist media can distort the actions of some of the more extreme elements in the movement to make the party appear to be racist, and anti-Latino.Tuesday (11//26) - 6:30 pm to 8:30 pm - Book Signing
Borders Books - 1830 Westwood Blvd, Westwood, CA
Wednesday (11/27) - 6:30 pm - Book Signing/Speech
Garden Grove Women's Club - 9501 Chapman Ave., Garden Grove, CASuch a charge could effectively crush the Bush administration's outreach program to the huge (and growing) numbers of Hispanic voters who are in this country LEGALLY, but many my most passionate conservative FRiends have chosen to force this extremely important issue into the forefront of our political discussions.
Fortunately, Michelle Malkin may be the IDEAL person to lead this charge. Like Ann Coulter, she is a young attractive woman - which should not matter in the ideal world of well-reasoned political discourse, but really DOES matter in the superficial world of "television journalism." Good looks get her in the door, and then good THINKING delivers her powerful conservative message.
As I understand it, Michelle's brief appearance on Hugh's show this Monday is a "trail balloon" of sorts, to determine if she should be on his show again in the future - perhaps even as a regular weekly guest! - so please be on your best behavior. :o)Let us show Hugh, and Jim Robinson - and President Bush! - that there **is** room in the GOP's "big tent" for BOTH serious proponents of immigration reform AND for advocates for an expanded Hispanic outreach...
www.HughHewitt.com
Michelle Malkin is qualified to speak on the subject of illegal immigration, because she's studied the issue, she's intelligent, articulate, can think on her feet and can keep her head under pressure.At least we are all in agreement about THIS part. :o)
What I would like for Hugh to ask her about is a variation of THIS question:Here is a part of her answer that I would like for Hugh to explore, from:"Now that we have re-taken the Senate, and have the ability to implement our policies, what does the GOP do about immigration reform NOW?"
MICHELLE MALKIN: NO MORE AMNESTIES, PERIOD
Human Events ^ | Nov. 20, 2002 | Terence P. Jeffrey
Posted on 11/21/2002 7:30 AM PST by madfly
-- snip --H[uman]E[vents]: For the first time since 1954 we have a government totally under Republican control. What should this all-Republican government do legislatively to begin getting this problem under control?
Malkin: Well, its not legislative, but the first thing that President Bush should do is replace INS Commissioner James Ziglar pronto.
HE: Hes announced his resignation, but is still sitting in the office. Do you have a candidate to replace him?
Malkin: I like Pete Nuñez, who was a Bush I Treasury Department official, and who is teaching immigration law right now in San Diego. He really understands that immigration has to be treated as a national security issue first.
HE: So once Pete Nuñez becomes INS commissioner, whats step two?
Malkin: Getting serious about fixing our deportation system. In my book, I quote the late Rep. Barbara Jordan [D.-Tex.], who headed a federal immigration reform panel several years ago. She said, and I paraphrase, that credibility in immigration policy requires three things: letting people in who deserve to be here, keeping people out who dont deserve to be here, and kicking people out who got here illegally. As the case of sniper suspect Lee Malvo shows, our deportation system is in complete shambles.
HE: Estimates of the number of illegal aliens in the United States run as high as 11 million. Are you ready to quite literally deport every one of them?
Malkin: Yes. Either our laws mean something or they dont.
________________
© Human Events, 2002
more
Does the over-whelming percentage of minority voters still vote Democrat?
It's great to have Michelle on the conservative side of the Illegal immigration debate, but because she's so good.
Malkin: I like Pete Nuñez, who was a Bush I Treasury Department official, and who is teaching immigration law right now in San Diego.See also, from www.humaneventsonline.com:
He really understands that immigration has to be treated as a national security issue first...
"...In order to get that law-and-order person at the INS now that a Republican occupies the Oval Office (the previous Democratic administration was not noted for its concern for law or order), [president of the American Council for Immigration Reform (ACIR), Joan] Hueter is pushing the candidate for INS commissioner favored by activists who believe in sovereign borders, Peter Nuñez. She recently squired him to a meeting of influential Washington conservatives and has made rounds on Capitol Hill trying to drum up support.A member of the Naval Reserves, lawyer, and lecturer in the University of San Diegos political science department, Nuñez favors strictly enforcing the laws against illegal immigrationa position that seems logical but is actually controversial.
"Peter Nuñez has given congressional testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, Subcommittee on Oversight. . . . Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Also annual appearances before the Senate and House Treasury appropriations subcommittees," says an information sheet about him prepared by ACIR. Nuñez was U.S. attorney for San Diego under Reagan and assistant secretary of the treasury for enforcement under Bush Sr., and was chairman of the Southwest Border Committee.
"I believe in Peter," said Hueter. Nuñezs boss would be Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft. "Sen. Ashcroft is a strong law-and-order person. Mr. Nuñez is a strong law-and-order person."
Peter Nuñez, J.D. Peter K. Nuñez began his career in law enforcement in 1972 as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorneys Office in San Diego, California. He held a number of positions in that office before being appointed as the U.S. Attorney by President Ronald Reagan in 1982. Mr. Nuñez served as the U.S. Attorney through August of 1988, when he left to become a litigation partner in the San Diego office of one of California's largest civil law firms.
In 1990, he was appointed by President George Bush to be the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Enforcement in Washington, D.C. He was responsible for all law enforcement functions of the Treasury Department, including the Customs Service, the Secret Service, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, the Criminal Investigations Division of the Internal Revenue Service, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Since 1998 he has been involved in providing training, advice, and technical assistance to various foreign governments with respect to legal reform and the improvement of their criminal justice systems. He has been a law enforcement advisor to the Governments of Armenia and El Salvador under a program sponsored by the Treasury Department. He has also worked with government officials in Georgia, Ukraine, Kuwait, Qatar, Egypt, Turkey and Israel in the development of legal reforms in the criminal justice and law enforcement systems.
Mr. Nuñez graduated from Duke University in 1964, served in the U.S. Navy, and attended law school at the University of San Diego, graduating cum laude in 1970.nunezfam@juno.com
It sounds like she knows quite a few of the players, and has put together a pretty good list, but she seems to be too modest to include the MOST IMPORTANT name that should be on that list of possible replacements for James Ziglar:Please, President Bush, another soft-on-crime Beltway back-slapper won't do
(08/21/02) http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Good riddance to James Ziglar, the hopeless head of the Immigration and Naturalization Service who announced his resignation last week.
This is a man whose main qualifications for the nation's top immigration enforcement job were his boyhood friendship with Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott and his effortless ability to suck up to Sen. Ted Kennedy.
This is a man whose law enforcement background consisted of less than three years as the U.S. Senate's sergeant-at-arms and doorkeeper, protecting the Senate gavel and playing Senate hall monitor. This is a man who freely admitted before his confirmation that he had "no discernible experience in immigration law and policy."
This is a man whose idea of increasing U.S.-Mexican border security was to give his beleaguered agents pepperball guns, and whose idea of leadership was to openly assure millions of illegal aliens earlier this spring that it is "not practical or reasonable" to deport them. Everyone knows the INS lacks the proper resources and manpower to do its job. But good grief, did we really need the nation's top immigration officer using his megaphone to advertise his own cluelessness and question the reasonableness of the laws he was supposed to enforce?
But let's not be too hard on Ziglar. He didn't seek out the job. It was his elbow-rubbing pals who promoted his nomination, and it was President Bush who ultimately put him in power. Administration insiders are saying Ziglar wasn't pushed out. But when his impending departure is coupled with the recent "retirement" of the State Department's Consular Affairs chief, Mary Ryan-she was sacked after intrepid National Review reporter Joel Mowbray relentlessly blew the whistle on her office's terrorist-friendly visa policies-it seems on the surface that the Bush administration is finally getting rid of the pre-September 11 furniture and updating the bureaucratic front offices for the War on Terror.
Whether or not the INS gets folded into the proposed Homeland Security Department, it needs top executives who understand that immigration in the post-September 11 era must be treated first and foremost as a national security issue-not as a politically correct entitlement, not as a social engineering experiment, not as a diplomatic tool, and not as a cash cow. The agency needs someone with:
In short, Ziglar's replacement should be someone from the enforcement side of the trenches. Someone who has led by example and who will send a message to INS employees that their jobs-patrolling the border, tracking down immigration outlaws, and kicking them out of the country-are not only "practical" and "reasonable," but more important than ever during the War on Terror.
- the dedication of Detroit-based Border Patrol officers Mark Hall and Robert Lindemann, who guard the northern border and, at risk of their own jobs, offered prescient warnings to Congress about the threat of terrorists and other criminal aliens exploiting lax immigration enforcement;
- the guts of Neil Jacobs, the former assistant director of investigations at INS's Dallas office, who suffered retaliation for helping expose the Clinton-Gore administration's corruption of the naturalization process;
- the foresight of Mary Schneider, a 20-year veteran of the INS in Orlando who warned a deaf Justice Department years before the September 11 attacks that aliens connected to Osama bin Laden were operating in Florida and illegally gaining residence;
- the wisdom of Bill King, a retired senior Border Patrol agent who knows the perils of granting mass amnesty to illegal aliens after having administered the 1986 amnesty program for the INS Western Region;
- and the administrative experience of Peter Nunez, a former U.S. attorney for San Diego who served under President Reagan and was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Enforcement in the first Bush administration, acting as liaison on border issues between the INS, the U.S. Customs Service, and Drug Enforcement Agency.
Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, warns wisely that perhaps we shouldn't hope too much: "After all, the State Department has nominated a clone to succeed Mary Ryan, and an important member of Ziglar's team remains dangerously in place: INS policy director Stuart Anderson, a libertarian ideologue who has crusaded tirelessly for years, in and out of government, for open borders."
Please, President Bush, another soft-on-crime Beltway back-slapper won't do.
Michelle Malkin
Learning and reciting the pledge in Spanish doesn't sound like a bad idea at all for all Spanish-speaking Americans and FReepers. I sorta like this version. It sings.
-archy-/-
I don't know where you live but,I live in L.A., and I know what you mean, but there are lots of OTHER goofy trends around here that are NON-Latino:
I have personally seen a trend towards non-assimilation and the pushing of chicano rights...
anti-war, anti-SUV, pro-abortion, pro-gay, etc.IMHO, we need to fight ALL of these counter-productive (left-wing) trends with POSITIVE replacements, like organization that promote church, family and civic responsibilty.
Tancredo-Time bump
Seriously, I have found out more about Michelle Malkin from THIS THREAD than they seem to have discovered when she was on with Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, 20/20, etc. - and we haven't even heard what Hugh will ask her yet.Not sure about the Philippine connection, but since (from her bio) Michelle was born in Philadelphia to immigrant parents, she would appear to qualify as a "natural born" citizen - and hence, can be President, unlike Ah-nuld. :o)
Not sure about Oberlin College, either. What is their reputation?
Also - not sure that I am familiar with the INS's "catch and release" program, but I do NOT like what I am reading about it, from www.nationalreview.com:
October 25, 2002, 9:00 a.m.
Who Let Lee Malvo Loose?
What the INS did wrong.By Michelle Malkin
he mainstream media informed us this week that Lee Malvo, the reportedly 17-year-old youth charged as a material witness in the sniper investigation along with his stepfather John Mohammed, is a "Jamaican national." As of this writing (Oct. 24), the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to comment publicly on the exact nature of Malvo's immigration status.Here are the facts the INS doesn't want you to know: Lee Malvo is an illegal alien from Jamaica who jumped ship in Miami in June 2001. He was apprehended by the Border Patrol in Bellingham, Wash., in December 2001, but was then let go by the INS district in Seattle in clear violation of federal law and contrary to what the arresting Border Patrol officers intended, according to my law-enforcement sources.
According to INS records I obtained, Malvo was arrested by Border Patrol agents in Bellingham, Wash., on Dec. 19, 2001. Local police called the Border Patrol during an incident involving "some sort of custody dispute" between Malvo's mother, Uma Sceon James, and stepfather, John Mohammed (the ex-Army soldier with black radical Muslim ties now at the center of the sniper investigation). James admitted that six months earlier, "she and her son were passengers on a cargo ship that was filled with 'illegal asians (sic).' They were all off loaded in the Miami, FL area where she immediately located work at the Red Lobster in Ft. Myers, FL."
From there, Malvo and James traveled to Tacoma, Wash., and ended up in Bellingham. At the time of their arrest, INS records indicate, neither Malvo nor his mother had any documents proving their identities or allowing them "to be or remain in the United States legally." The Border Patrol agents concluded that because she had "no roots or close family ties in the United States, James was likely to abscond." The arresting officer noted that the mother-and-son illegal aliens, Malvo and James, would be "detained at the Seattle Detention facility in Seattle, Washington pending deportation charges."
That's not what happened. About a month after their arrest, Malvo and his mother were set free by the Seattle district INS contrary to what the arresting Border Patrol officers had determined should be done. And in clear violation of federal law regarding the removal of illegal alien stowaways. According to the Detention and Deportation Officers' Field Manual:
Occasionally, you may encounter an alien who claims to be a stowaway, but cannot or will not provide information concerning the name of the vessel of arrival. Prior to April 1, 1997, such aliens could be handled in the same way as any other EWI (entered without inspection) case and placed into removal proceedings. The (Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act), however, directs that stowaways, regardless of when encountered, are to be removed without a hearing . . . citing section 235(a)(2) of the Act as the authority for the action.
The law is explicit: Illegal alien stowaways are to be detained and deported without hearings. James admitted that she and her son were illegal alien stowaways. Yet, in January 2002, James was released on a $1,500 bond; Malvo was set loose without any bond on his own recognizance. Here is my theory: Somebody at the Seattle INS office leaned on the arresting Border Patrol officers to disregard Malvo and his mother's "stowaway" status allowing them to run free and allowing the INS to avoid the costs associated with detention and deportation.
So, who let Lee Malvo loose? The Seattle INS office referred my call to the Washington, D.C., headquarters. The national headquarters referred calls to the Montgomery County sniper task force. Standard INS operating procedure: Pass the buck and run for cover.
"This makes me sick to my stomach," says Daryl Schermerhorn, vice president of the Northwest regional chapter of the National Border Patrol Council, which represents Border Patrol agents in Washington State. "The INS is not concerned with enforcing immigration law," he told me this week. "It's more concerned with freeing up jails and saving a few bucks than it is with protecting Americans and removing people who don't belong here."
As I document in my book, Invasion, these countless "catch and release" cases have demoralized rank-and-file INS agents and cost scores of American lives from cops gunned down by fugitive deportees to victims of illegal border-crossing murderers, and now, quite possibly, to the innocents slaughtered in the Washington, D.C.-area sniping spree.
Eugene Davis, a retired deputy chief Border Patrol agent in Blaine, Wash., told me: "This is another classic example of how our catch and release policy for illegal aliens remains a danger to us all. What's it going to take for the American people to demand that we fix the system?"
Michelle Malkin is author of Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores.
COPYRIGHT 2002 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Go to the colleges and hear these idiots talking about the "struggle" by La Raza. Get a clue.The problem of Latino non-assimilation may indeed be very real, and it certainly needs to be addressed, but you will not convince me by citing what the "young skulls full of mush" (a la Rush) do on the local college campi. :)
We were all young and stupid once, but the actions of local college "protest" groups are not a very effective measure of ANYTHING, IMHO.
You can LISTEN LIVE to the "Hugh Hewitt" radio program - over the Internet at:It's SHOW TIME!!!
www.DCradio700.com
click here
to
LISTEN LIVE
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.