Skip to comments.
MICHELLE MALKIN: NO MORE AMNESTIES, PERIOD
Human Events ^
| Nov. 20, 2002
| Terence P. Jeffrey
Posted on 11/21/2002 7:30:00 AM PST by madfly
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: dennisw
I read the Spanish language press in the US. It caters not only to Mexicans nowadays, but millions of others now because they have also streamed in (in the millions) and have an attitude as if they own the place.
One common point in the various editorials and reports is THEY ALL SCREAM ABOUT AND FOR AMNESTY (Salvadorans, Brazilians, Peruvians, Nicarguans, Hondurans, Bolivians, Panamanians, Colombians, Ecuadorians, Guatemalans) in these Spanish- language papers because 'Well, los Mexicanos are getting THEIRS', how 'bout us!?". It also seems to raise in pitch whenever the president or foreign minister of these countries sending us wave upon wave of illegal, visit D.C. to lobby for the rights of their number one export to the USA: lawbreakers.
It is true. It has to be stopped. It is waaaaay out of control. All you ever hear in these newspapers when they don't think anyone is listening in, is 'regularizacion' and 'amnestia', and 'la 245(i)' and 'derechos humanos' and 'el racista, Tom Tancredo'. Plus, pages filled with ads later in the paper for lawyers slick in dealing with quick ways for amnesty, TPS, SSN cards, and the like. The terrorist potential to join this uncontrollabe stream is right here and right now. Yet we sleep. Stupid America (actually, stupid leaders)
Enough.
Less of Illegal Aliens.
More of Michelle Malkin.
Growl.
To: LiberalsWorstNightmare
I expect my or others' postings here about a possible
Michelle Malkin run for Congress attempt, to be given as much unhindered free FR 'airtime' as the management also allowed open campaigning here for President Bush in 2000 and Bill Simon for Governor in 2002.
Anything less granted or allowed would be sham hypocrisy.
To: madfly
Why isn't Michelle subject to the Ann Coulter rule? This is one very hot lady and no thread should be without obligatory photos!
23
posted on
11/21/2002 8:23:37 AM PST
by
msgt
To: madfly
She said, and I paraphrase, that credibility in immigration policy requires three things: letting people in who deserve to be here, keeping people out who dont deserve to be here, and kicking people out who got here illegally.This should be nailed over the entrance of every INS office, and made part of a pledge the INS official must take!
Stop the politically "correct" crap and make the country realize that the conservative are not anti-immigration, we are anti-illegal immigration (trespassing, actually).
Go Michelle!!
To: MissAmericanPie
PROMISING MINORITY/FEMALE CONSERVATIVE OR NOT, BUSH WILL
NOT NOMINATE MALKIN FOR
INS OR ANY POST. GIVE IT UP.
REALITY: SHE IS ON OR WOULD SHORTLY BE ON THE "TOM TANCREDO S/LIST' " MANAGED BY KARL ROVE IN THE WEST WING.
LET'S DEAL WITH REALITIES.
GO FOR CONGRESS. GO FOR IT NOW.
To: msgt
Ann is very publicly unmarried, and I think that has a lot to do with it.
Michelle is married, and it has been mentioned several times that her husband is a frequent lurker.
I think the unwritten rule about no cheesecake photos of Michelle has a lot to do with that. Most FReepers are big on propriety.
26
posted on
11/21/2002 8:26:27 AM PST
by
Illbay
To: LiberalsWorstNightmare
BTTT!
27
posted on
11/21/2002 8:32:14 AM PST
by
4Freedom
To: madfly
I quote the late Rep. Barbara Jordan [D.-Tex.], who headed a federal immigration reform panel several years ago. Since people first started speculating on a woman for president, I always nominated Barbara Jordan. She was a Democrat in the time when you didn't have to be a nutty, tax-happy, race-obsessed idiot to be a Democrat. She would have made a truly great American president. fsf
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: B4Ranch; Pete-R-Bilt
outstanding interview ping.
To: madfly
immigration policy requires three things: letting people in who deserve to be here, keeping people out who dont deserve to be here, and kicking people out who got here illegally. And folks, I'm here to tell you that is as simple as that.
To: Registered
Thank you! Thank you! We're not worthy!
32
posted on
11/21/2002 8:49:49 AM PST
by
texson66
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: msgt
To: BeechF33A
your voice and insight is very important in this debate
To: AmericanInTokyo
Agreed. Should she be elected to congress, she would be stabbed in the back by the Republicans and the White House who are so busy trying to buy votes with amnesty promises that they don't see the real danger that uncontrolled immigration is causing.
To: Blood of Tyrants
Then Congresswoman Malkin (R-FR) could help to start forming a Republican Caucus for Border Integrity (RCBI) in the house. And get this group supported and funded by the grassroots. The white house/RINO republicans still could not defeat such movement.
To: MissAmericanPie
A big ping on that suggestion!
To: All
Wow! Michelle is definitely the kind of voice that needs to be heard.....she is smart, stylish, and forceful. Go Michelle!!
39
posted on
11/21/2002 1:06:50 PM PST
by
Morrigan
To: Blood of Tyrants
Okay, call me a Pollyanna, but I think there is more deep "strategery" going on with the WH and the illegal immigration issue than meets the eye. I can't help but think that there is a larger plan in the works. . .
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson