Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gore: Dems Have Good Chance in 2004
AP ^ | 11/21/02 | By WILL LESTER

Posted on 11/21/2002 7:24:32 AM PST by jern

<p>-->

Yahoo! News News Home - Yahoo! - Help

AP
 Welcome, sjernigan14 Personalize News Home Page   -   Sign Out 
Yahoo! News   Thu, Nov 21, 2002
Search    for     Advanced
News Front Page
Top Stories
U.S. National
   Crimes and Trials
Business
World
Entertainment
Sports
Technology
Politics
Science
Health
Oddly Enough
Op/Ed
Lifestyle
Local
Comics
News Photos
Weather
Most Popular
Audio/Video
Full Coverage
Lottery
Crosswords
News for Kids

Full Coverage
More about
Democratic Party
Related News Stories
Gore: Dems Have Good Chance in 2004 Associated Press (Nov 21, 2002)
Gore: Bush Loses Terror Focus Washington Post (Nov 20, 2002)
Gore Says U.S. Headed Down Wrong Track Reuters (Nov 20, 2002)
Opinion & Editorials
Democrats need solutions not backbiting Boston Globe (Nov 20, 2002)
Enter Gore, Bold Man On the Left Washington Post (Nov 20, 2002)
Gore's Suicide NY Post (Nov 20, 2002)
Feature Articles
Al and Tipper Gore Larry King Live/CNN (Nov 19, 2002)
A 'new' Al Gore returns:front, not quite center Christian Science Monitor (Nov 19, 2002)
Related Web Sites
Democratic National Committee
21st Century Democrats
Democratic Leadership Council

News Resources
  Providers
  AP
  Reuters
  The New York Times
  USA TODAY
  NPR
  U.S. News & World Report

News Alerts
  Afghanistan
  Al Gore
  Saddam Hussein
  David Letterman
  President Bush
Search News
Search:

for

Advanced

 
U.S. National - AP
Gore: Dems Have Good Chance in 2004
Thu Nov 21, 3:04 AM ET
Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!

By WILL LESTER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Al Gore (news - web sites) says whoever the Democrats nominate for president could have an excellent chance to reclaim the White House in 2004 because President Bush (news - web sites)'s economic policies have been "a catastrophic failure."

Photo
Reuters Photo

In an interview with The Associated Press on Wednesday, Gore also said Bush is making serious mistakes in the war on terrorism by shifting his focus to Iraq before finishing the job with al-Qaida.

But the former vice president hasn't yet decided whether to make another run for president. If he does, however, he plans to run a different kind of campaign.

"I've learned a lot over the last two years, including some things about myself," said Gore, the Democratic nominee in 2000. "I think I'm better at some things in politics than others. If I did run again I would concentrate on two things — talking with people in relaxed settings one on one in small groups, and listening carefully ... and taking whatever time I needed to find the words with which I could communicate straight from the heart on the major challenges facing the country.

"The rest of it I would try to completely leave to others ... that includes running around from pillar to post doing these media events from town to town."

Gore is on the brink of deciding whether he will seek the Democratic nomination and thus the chance to oppose Bush for a second time. He said he would decide over the Christmas holidays.

"It's not just about me, it's about how I can best serve my country, whether I would be the best candidate for Democrats to put forward against Bush," Gore said. Gore got the most votes of any Democratic candidate ever and more votes than Bush, even though he narrowly lost the electoral vote count after a drawn-out recount battle in Florida.

He said he believes Democrats should be in good shape to run against Bush in 2004.

Bush has not announced that he will run again, but the presumption is that he will seek re-election.

The Republicans dominated in the elections this year, but that is because the economy's problems "did not count for a lot in the midterm elections because they shifted the national dialogue to a war with Iraq and — as the president's chief of staff put it — they waited until Labor Day to roll out a new product line," Gore said, referring to a possible war with Iraq.

"As the fall elections approached, for whatever reason, he decided to start a new war," Gore said. "Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) is a bad guy who deserves to be removed from power. But he is not the one who attacked us Sept. 11. He is not the one who is threatening to kill us right now.

Gore said growing problems with the economy would offer Democrats an opening because the Bush-Cheney economic strategy of providing wide-ranging tax cuts that include the wealthiest Americans "has been a catastrophic failure."

Gore has said the entire Bush economic program and economic team should be thrown out, and the administration should start over with tax cuts aimed specifically at the middle class.

And he said the president has made a mistake by shifting his focus from al-Qaida, blamed for the Sept. 11 attacks, to Iraq.

Despite the U.S.-led military campaign to destroy al-Qaida's base in Afghanistan (news - web sites), he said, "the warlords are back in control, the Taliban is back in and for a variety of reasons al-Qaida is back at full strength and Osama is back making his threats against the U.S."

The former vice president was interviewed by telephone from Los Angeles.

In response, Republican spokesman Kevin Sheridan said "Al Gore's desperate attacks are losing their shock value."

"Gore accuses the president of not finishing the war on terror but fails to grasp the concept that our threats are not confined to one man, one group or one nation," Sheridan said.

After keeping a low profile for months after the 2000 election loss, the 54-year-old Gore has gradually re-emerged in recent months through a series of policy speeches and a limited number of campaign appearances for Democratic candidates. He's making a book tour with his wife, Tipper, promoting the book they wrote together, "Joined at the Heart: The Transformation of the American Family."

In the past few days, Gore has made numerous TV appearances, including interviews with Barbara Walters, David Letterman (news - Y! TV) and Larry King.

Gore acknowledged he has plenty of work to do winning over Democrats who remain skeptical after his loss to Bush.

He said he will "have to convince the political insiders and the journalistic community that I'd learned enough to run a better campaign."


Mail to Friend  Email Story
Message Boards   Post/Read Msgs (5717)
Printer Version   Print Story
Ratings: Would you recommend this story?
Not at all 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 Highly


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; algore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: jern
He is right if the Republicans squander this opportunity like they did following the '94 elections. Stay focused, stay intense and above all stay united. Don't let Pat Robertson or the loose Buchanan fracture party unity again.
21 posted on 11/21/2002 1:25:15 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
A time traveller went forward to Jan 2005 and took this picture...

So Rehnquist still hasn't retired?

22 posted on 11/21/2002 1:30:46 PM PST by Koblenz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jern
The dimmocrats have what amounts to a snowball's chance in Hell of turning their political fortunes around in 2004! First of all they are in such a tail spin over all this that they will find it difficult to find their butts with both hands!

To undo the damage they have visited on a once solid base of constituants nationwide they will have to out swim a crawfish being chased by a big ole Conservative Bass. It is not possible for them to make a substantial return in that short of a period of time. The gorons have bought the farm this time and he will find it difficult if not impossible to even win the nomination!

Right now there is not even a viable, credible candidate to challenge GWBat the Presidential level. People who could once be bought off with empty promises won't believe the lies anymore no matter how they are sugar coated. All we have to do is base our approach on issues that answers the basic needs of the voters. Straight talk will seal the majority we now command. The margin of difference we wittnessed in the election came from people who have had it with all the shennagins of sloppy mindless drivel flowing from lying lips. The power that was placed in the right place this election shocked to the core a system nobody thought could be broken down. For many years the Solid South held sway saying every year to those captive voters "This Time Things Will Change" Well as Ronnie Reagan would say you shouldn't lie to the people anymore! Live by the lie, Die By The Lie! The change had better come quick or they'll be sicking the dogs on us!
23 posted on 11/21/2002 1:55:03 PM PST by wharfrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Hey, Al!! Can you say, "Sacrificial Lamb"???
24 posted on 11/21/2002 2:17:31 PM PST by Gunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
Doh!
25 posted on 11/22/2002 6:09:16 AM PST by BSunday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson