Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TARGET: Tom Tancredo (Warned "never to darken the door of the White House again.")
Roll Call ^ | November 18, 2002 | Josh Kurtz

Posted on 11/18/2002 6:23:24 PM PST by Mark Felton

November 18, 2002

Target: Tom Tancredo

Some Say GOPPrimary Challenge Likely

By Josh Kurtz He represents one of the most conservative districts in the nation. He just trounced his Democratic challenger by 37 points. Yet Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) may be one of the most vulnerable incumbents in the 2004 election cycle.

Tancredo, a controversial, outspoken voice for the Republican right who is entering his third term, has angered leading Republicans back home and in the White House.

The House Member's criticisms of President Bush's immigration policy bought him a 40-minute rebuke earlier this year from Bush adviser Karl Rove, who, in the Congressman's own words, warned him "never to darken the door of the White House again." And his decision to renounce his pledge to serve only three terms has infuriated powerful Colorado Republicans, including his political patron, former Sen. Bill Armstrong (R).

"I'll be surprised if he doesn't have a primary [in 2004]," said Floyd Ciruli, an independent Colorado pollster.

Several Republicans, including popular state Treasurer Mike Coffman, who just won a landslide re-election of his own, are considering taking on Tancredo in the '04 primary.

Other potential candidates include state Sen. Jim Dyer (R) and former Arapahoe County Commissioner Steve Ward. "It's a given" that someone will run against the 56-year-old lawmaker, Coffman said. "There are questions about his term-limit pledge. When you have someone like Senator Armstrong, who was his mentor, backing away from him - I think that resonates."

Armstrong was instrumental in getting Tancredo elected in the first place, endorsing him over four strong opponents in a competitive GOP primary to replace retiring Rep. Dan Schaefer (R) in 1998. By Tancredo's reckoning, Armstrong's blessing was worth 3 points at the polls - which just happened to be his margin of victory in the primary.

Even though he may not seek re-election in 2004 - and would consider running for Senate if Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R) retires - he has chucked the term-limit promise nevertheless.

"The term-limit pledge in and of itself is not the deciding factor if he will run again," said Tancredo spokeswoman Lara Kennedy.

Like all Members who change their minds on term limits, Tancredo has cast his decision as being in the best interests of his district and pet causes. Tancredo wants to preserve his seniority for his suburban district south of Denver and angle for better committee assignments. Plus, he does not want to lose the momentum he has built fighting the government's open immigration policies, Kennedy said. Tancredo is the founder of the House Immigration Reform Caucus.

While plenty of politicians have broken their term-limit pledges before, including Rep. Scott McInnis (R-Colo.), Tancredo's decision is more noteworthy because he once headed Colorado's term-limit organization.

"All too often you have terrific candidates who come to Washington with the best of intentions, but they get too comfortable, and when the time comes, they don't want to go home," lamented Stacie Rumenap, a spokeswoman for U.S.Term Limits.

Whether Tancredo suffers any political damage remains to be seen. So far, the handful of Members who have broken their pledges, including McInnis, have not suffered any consequences at the polls, Rumenap conceded. And U.S.Term Limits is not in the business of recruiting challengers to incumbents who have broken the pledge.

Tancredo has promised to return campaign contributions to donors who are dismayed at his decision to ignore the term-limits pledge. But Armstrong - who did not respond to several messages left at his Denver law office - called the refund offer "hollow," according to The Rocky Mountain News.

Armstrong, meanwhile, has offered some kind words about Coffman.

"Mike Coffman is someone the Republican Party and the people of Colorado will rally around,"he told the News. "There is no doubt in my mind that he will be on the short list for whatever comes along - it could be governor, it could be Senator, it could be Congress."

Coffman, in fact, began running for Congress last year - in the new 7th district, which adjoins Tancredo's. But when the final district lines were drawn, Coffman found himself in Tancredo's 6th district, just a few blocks from the 7th, and chose not to move or run.

Coffman said that while he has not given much thought to the 2004 election yet, he believes that Tancredo will be vulnerable. The three Republicans most frequently mentioned as challengers are all military veterans, while Tancredo is not, and that could make a difference in a district that values military service, political insiders said.

Coffman, a 47-year-old Marine Corps vet who served in Operation Desert Storm, said Tancredo's military deferments during the Vietnam War would hurt him as America prepares to attack Iraq, and could be linked to his decision to ignore the term-limit pledge.

"Here's a guy ordering young men off to war and he himself didn't serve," he said. "I think in this conservative district, something like that could resonate."

Certainly, Tancredo's record would contrast with Coffman's, or Dyer's, who is an Air Force veteran, or Ward's, who is a lieutenant colonel in the Marine Corps Reserves and is on active duty in Florida.

Dyer called it "highly unlikely" that he would challenge Tancredo, but said somebody else might, and predicted that the term-limit issue would sting the incumbent.

"I think a number of people that support Tom are not going to support him if he breaks the term-limit pledge,"said Dyer, who was a surrogate for Tancredo at a candidate forum this fall. "We can't say that situational ethics is bad for party A but not for party B."

Ward, a former mayor of suburban Glendale, could not be reached for comment, but is expected to return to Colorado next year. In an interview with the News after completing his one term on the Arapahoe County Commission, Ward made his opinion of politicians who stay in office too long perfectly clear.

"Any politician who can't find the bathrooms in the first week doesn't deserve to be in public office," he said.

It is unclear whether the White House would try to get involved in a primary challenge to Tancredo.

But it is fair to say that Tancredo is not one of the president's favorite people. Earlier this year, the Congressman accused Bush of pandering to Hispanic voters and trying to prop up Mexican President Vicente Fox by offering amnesty to certain undocumented immigrants. That declaration brought an angry 40-minute phone call from Rove, and Bush pointedly failed to introduce Tancredo to the crowd during a political rally in Colorado in September.

With his hard-line views on immigration, Tancredo is no stranger to controversy. In 1999, he gained publicity for reaffirming his support for gun owners' rights just days after the massacre at Columbine High School, which is six blocks from his house.

The Southern Poverty Law Center released a report last summer linking Tancredo to extremist groups, which the Congressman dismissed as "McCarthyism."

And he was embarrassed earlier this year when it was revealed that undocumented workers had been hired to do some construction work on his Littleton home.

But pollster Ciruli said Tancredo's views on immigration are in line with his constituents'.

"Nobody who's going to argue the soft side of immigration is going to beat him in the Republican primary, or even in the general," he said.

After seeing two fairly viable opponents get wiped out by Tancredo in 1998 and 2000, Democrats appear to have abandoned the 6th district - leaving Republicans there to decide whether they want him to remain in office.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 1,101-1,115 next last
To: 4Freedom
Maybe Luis will invite you on his radio program to talk about the biography he's writing on himself. Wouldn't that be exciting?
681 posted on 11/19/2002 8:38:10 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
[Once again, post the law that he isn't enforcing.]

You know those pesky little border laws. The laws that are our first line of defense in this country. The ones that keep foreigners of every ilk from coming across the border to wreck havoc either with the economy or with our very lives.

He has adequate laws to make a dent in the immigration problem and to make the US more secure - but is not doing so. In fact, some of his speeches prior to 9/11 were astounding in that he referred to the illegals as 'just hardworking people who want a better life' and 'doing the work no one else will do'. That is not the way the President of the US should speak about lawbreakers. Just isn't.

Whether you support unfettered immigration, open borders, or just turn the country over to anyone who wants it - we still have laws and he is not and did not uphold them. Those laws.

Now I find that more a little more serious than deciding to run for a third term - but hey, open border advocates, the news media and the administration will harp on this every opportunity they get. It will be made the equivalent of deadly assault if the Tancredo haters have their way. They don't like the man because he is speaking things that need to be said. Immigration is the elephant in the living room they hope can be camouflaged before enough people begint o talk about it.

I think the speech of 'never darkening the door of the White House' was petty and tyrannical. It shows just how important immigration is to President Bush and just how he doesn't want the issue brought before the public until he can do something to guarantee they will all remain here.

682 posted on 11/19/2002 8:38:33 AM PST by nanny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
You know what? We still have responsibility toward our own citizens first.

They were not denied entry, they were told to "stand in line". By choosing to come into this country illegally, they became criminals. We don't need any more criminals here; we have enough of our own.

683 posted on 11/19/2002 8:39:17 AM PST by SCalGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I'm sorry, I disagree.

It's not warped, I'm just holding a high standard, and I want it met. That family's actions were no mortally equvalent to someone shooting a grizzly bear in the lower 48 states to protect their kids from being mauled - despite the grizzly's status in the lower 48 under the Endangered Species Act.

It's no different in my book.
684 posted on 11/19/2002 8:39:37 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Of course, anyone who mentions Tancredo is a racist. Then again, if they don't like America then they can leave. Turning this place into Mexico isn't my idea of a great nation. If Mexico was such a great place, then why are they trying to leave it? Mexico was created by Mexicans, so why are people so willing to let Mexicans turn the United States into Mexico? Tancreado should be prez, and if the Mexicans don't like it, they ain't supposed to be voting here anyway!
685 posted on 11/19/2002 8:41:56 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Bush as we know does not come on TV and explain all his ideas - that is a total waste of TV time and the stations would not even carry it.

He will do something when he has an answer. Nothing like expecting miracles from a president - run a war, set up a department to protect the homeland, work to reorganize all of the government agencies so they can protect us, win back the senate by campaigning day after day while handling his duties and fighting the democrats, the U.N., peace-niks, the libertarians and all who do not understand - solutions have to worked out, have to be made agreeable to the public, have to be sold and have to have the departments in place to handle it.

The INS is not doing their job now - how could they possibly handle the borders?
686 posted on 11/19/2002 8:42:10 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
At least Gigot and the Wall Street Journal have a consitent standard...

That is a problem. The open borders philosophy went out the window with 9/11. It's not just future lanscapers and petty criminals coming on in, it may be Mohammed wearing a sombrero and toting a Russian suitcase nuke.

687 posted on 11/19/2002 8:42:45 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

Comment #688 Removed by Moderator

To: hchutch
"... family in colombia ..."

As an American, that is my problem, how? Has that family lifted one itty-bitty finger with a gun to stop them? nope. A nation of sheeple, more so than we are.
689 posted on 11/19/2002 8:43:26 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
That Colombian family's reason for applying for asylum was bogus.

They should have been sent packing, immediately.

690 posted on 11/19/2002 8:43:50 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
A selfish attitude on your part - and the "big picture" is just an excuse to sweep this malfeasance under the rug.

Yes, "we" come first, including those applying to enter this country until we have denied them entry. Even if they are placed in a waiting list, we ought to be willing to check up on them - not only to ensure that nothing that would disqualify them would be overlooked, but also to determine whether or not we need to adjust that list due to a change in circumstances in that country.
691 posted on 11/19/2002 8:45:02 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: madfly
ROTFLMAO!
692 posted on 11/19/2002 8:46:07 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
"All too often you have terrific candidates who come to Washington with the best of intentions, but they get too comfortable, and when the time comes, they don't want to go home," lamented Stacie Rumenap, a spokeswoman for U.S.Term Limits.

Call me a hypocrite. I support term limits for Democrats and RINOs (good riddance Ganske, Morella and Roukema), but oppose them for rabid, right-wing Republicans. I hope every RINO honors his/her term pledge. But I miss B-1 Bob, and am thrilled to have someone like Tancredo, without whom, pro-illegal legislation would have been sneaked through the House in the dead of night.

693 posted on 11/19/2002 8:47:03 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
The Wall St. Journal is still preaching open borders, even after 9/11 and the sniper attacks. It's nothing but the almighty dollar for them, the country and its people can take a hike.
694 posted on 11/19/2002 8:47:27 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Just how much money do you think it would take to have military control the borders?

695 posted on 11/19/2002 8:48:27 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
hchutch seems to have the "I'm important" fever; a narcissistic attitude born of the 60’s generation. I have a lady here who likes to go to Viet Nam and southeast Asia to hand out Bibles, but she hasn’t handed out Bible one to an American kid. She thinks that she is a worldly important person because she travels “overseas”. Yeah, she uses that word often. Like most of her kind, she wants to make a difference, but only if it makes her feel important. An American would find her efforts just as important to them, but she feels more important because people in foreign countries has less.
696 posted on 11/19/2002 8:49:05 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal
Excellent point, 'BUMP'.
697 posted on 11/19/2002 8:49:54 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
"Just how much money do you think it would take to have military control the borders?"

Less than the money we have spent on 32,000 American GI's protecting South Korea from North Korea for the past 50 years and every year.
698 posted on 11/19/2002 8:50:26 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Try holding as high a standard for the people that might be lucky enough to become citizens one day as you hold for our government.
699 posted on 11/19/2002 8:51:06 AM PST by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Ok, we close the borders. Does that stop the illegals? No.

They can come in freely in containers, as stowaways, as shipmates and jump ship. There are hundreds of ways to get in America.

Therefore, closing the borders is not the total answer.

Or, is this just the newest tactic to trash Bush?
700 posted on 11/19/2002 8:51:14 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 1,101-1,115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson