Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: *bang_list
To: Tree of Liberty
Excellent ...and funny.....liberals of course will miss the point...but rapists, armed robbers and burglers wont...hehehehhe
3 posted on
11/18/2002 10:27:30 AM PST by
joesnuffy
To: Tree of Liberty
Yes! Yes ! yyeessss! Luvd it.......LOL.....
4 posted on
11/18/2002 10:27:56 AM PST by
litehaus
To: Tree of Liberty
BUMP
To: HangFire; Mercuria; feinswinesuksass; Lady Jenn
Let me be sure I understand what we have here, I replied. You have a video, of a lawful transaction, by law-abiding citizens, and wonder if that concerns me?
Oh, the horror... the HORROR!!
6 posted on
11/18/2002 10:40:53 AM PST by
AnnaZ
To: Tree of Liberty
Now, there is a liberal reporter with a gun. I can just picture the look on the reporters face as he looks at the rifle as if it were pure evil!!
To: Tree of Liberty
ROFL!!!
To: Tree of Liberty; Dan from Michigan; SLB; Lion Den Dan
Excellent.
To: Tree of Liberty
Sounds like "Texas" response.
To: Tree of Liberty
Care about gun rights?
If the conservative agenda is to have a chance of succeeding and if conservative judges are to gain Senate approval, we must preserve a Republican Senate--which is in greater jeopardy than many realize.
For those who understand why the Louisiana election is crucial to retaining the Senate in the face of possible Republican defections by Chafee and McCain, please see the article just posted on:
"How Suzanne Terrell can Defeat Mary Landrieu"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/791117/posts
The link provided to the COMPLETE NBC TRANSCRIPT is incorrect, and should be:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/836275.asp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you need convincing, also see the post:
Columnist Broder Sees Potential Party Switches by Senators McCain and Chaffee
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/791096/posts
12 posted on
11/18/2002 10:58:46 AM PST by
elenchus
To: Tree of Liberty
Pretty soon they will be calling it a "gun ownership loophole".
To: Tree of Liberty
Now, there is a liberal reporter with a gun. No doubt the story concluded with the reporter pensively and sanctimoniously assuring, "the gun we purchased has been destroyed."
17 posted on
11/18/2002 11:16:45 AM PST by
tdadams
To: Tree of Liberty
Since most of these shows are governed by publicly posted lists of restrictions, not the least of which is the specific prohibition of cameras or VCR's (without prior permission), I'd like to see these enterprising reporters rewarded for their efforts by charges of trespassing.
Problem is, that would likely give them even more publicity than these ditzes deserve.
On a side note, I recently attended the WAC (Washington Arms Collectors) gun show in Puyallup, Wa. The attendence there was AWESOME! In the otherwise liberal snakepit that is Western Washington it is good to see so much interest and active support of our 2nd Amendment rights.
19 posted on
11/18/2002 11:24:54 AM PST by
rockrr
To: Tree of Liberty
One correction, the Largest gun shows in the State of Washington are held monthly in Pierce County at the Puyallup Fairgrounds by the Washington Arms Collectors, not King County.
To: Tree of Liberty
Great Post
To: Tree of Liberty
The operative word here is PENDING!Pending ain't a law and besides,since when is excerising a constitutional right a DA*N LOOPHOLE?
To: Tree of Liberty
You have a video, of a lawful transaction, by law-abiding citizens, and wonder if that concerns me?I would have said, "Hell yes, that bothers me. Just what do you think you're doing filming people going about legal business? You're lucky they don't sue your a$$e$ off for implying, on the air, that they're doing something illegal".
To: Tree of Liberty
I told him I have not seen the legislation, but doubt it would be of any real value. The fact is, there are many laws, state and federal on the books but they havent been enforced for years. In fact, they are looking for ways to reduce sentences which will increase crime Another point to make: the more useless(*) laws are passed, the more time will be spent enforcing useless laws and the less time will be spent enforcing useful ones.
(*)Useless for the stated purpose. Gun-control laws are often politically very useful for their sponsors. For example, in "may issue" states, police chiefs may receive contributions to their re-election campaigns by those seeking to curry favor and receive carry licenses. If licenses were "shall issue", that source of re-election cash would vanish.
31 posted on
11/18/2002 7:07:20 PM PST by
supercat
To: Tree of Liberty
Good story. Great sheriff!
32 posted on
11/18/2002 8:06:38 PM PST by
Ditter
To: Tree of Liberty; EternalVigilance; RobRoy; null and void; Abundy; AAABEST; Neil E. Wright; ...
PING!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson